Literature DB >> 25531808

Assessment of acceptability and usability of new delivery prototype device for intradermal vaccination in healthy subjects.

Timothi J S Van Mulder1, Stijn Verwulgen, Koen C L Beyers, Linda Scheelen, Monique M Elseviers, Pierre Van Damme, Vanessa Vankerckhoven.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the acceptability and usability of a newly developed intradermal prototype device, VAX-ID™, in healthy subjects. In April 2012 an investigational study was conducted in healthy subjects aged 18 to 65 y. To compare injection site and route of administration, subjects were allocated to 4 subgroups, either receiving subsequently 2 intradermal (ID) injections (one in the forearm and one in the deltoid) or an ID (forearm) and an intramuscular (IM) (deltoid) injection. All injections contained saline solution. Acceptability was assessed with a subjects' questionnaire and a daily electronic diary for 5 d. Usability was assessed with a vaccinators' questionnaire and an expert panel. A 10-point Visual Analog Scale was used to score several statements on usability and acceptability. A total of 102 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study (age: 19-63). No statistically significant differences were seen in demographic characteristics between the ID and IM groups. Anxiety before injection, pain during injection and duration of injection were rated significantly lower for ID compared to IM. One day after the injections, redness was reported more often after ID injection in the forearm versus ID in the deltoid; pain at injection site was reported significantly more often after IM vs. ID injection. The new VAX-ID prototype device was found easy to handle, easy to use and safe. The new VAX-ID prototype device was shown to have a high degree of acceptability as well as usability. Further studies with VAX-ID will be conducted using vaccine antigen allowing assessment of immunogenicity and safety. Additionally, these studies will help to further improve VAX-ID in terms of accuracy of delivered dose and feedback to the vaccinator. (NCT01963338).

Entities:  

Keywords:  injection device; intradermal; vaccination; vaccine delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25531808      PMCID: PMC4514056          DOI: 10.4161/21645515.2014.979655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  24 in total

Review 1.  Devices for intradermal vaccination.

Authors:  Elsa E Kis; Gerhard Winter; Julia Myschik
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  A systematic review of intradermal influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Flora Young; Fawziah Marra
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Clinical studies assessing immunogenicity and safety of intradermally administered influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Vanessa Vankerckhoven; Pierre Van Damme
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.648

4.  Intradermal influenza vaccine for older adults: a randomized controlled multicenter phase III study.

Authors:  Robert Arnou; Giancarlo Icardi; Marijke De Decker; Arvydas Ambrozaitis; Marie-Pierre Kazek; Françoise Weber; Pierre Van Damme
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Intradermal delivery of vaccines: potential benefits and current challenges.

Authors:  J K Hickling; K R Jones; M Friede; D Zehrung; D Chen; D Kristensen
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  II. Needle phobia: a psychological perspective.

Authors:  K Jenkins
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal influenza vaccination in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Ru-Chien Chi; Michael T Rock; Kathleen M Neuzil
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal influenza vaccine in children.

Authors:  Susanna Esposito; Cristina Daleno; Irene Picciolli; Laura Tagliaferri; Alessia Scala; Giulia Prunotto; Valentina Montinaro; Carlotta Galeone; Nicola Principi
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  The immunogenicity of intradermal influenza vaccination in COPD patients.

Authors:  Benjamas Chuaychoo; Phunsup Wongsurakiat; Arth Nana; Uraiwan Kositanont; Khun Nanta Maranetra
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Safety and immunogenicity of an HIV adenoviral vector boost after DNA plasmid vaccine prime by route of administration: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Beryl A Koblin; Martin Casapia; Cecilia Morgan; Li Qin; Zhixue Maggie Wang; Olivier D Defawe; Lindsey Baden; Paul Goepfert; Georgia D Tomaras; David C Montefiori; M Juliana McElrath; Lilian Saavedra; Chuen-Yen Lau; Barney S Graham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of Forces in Intradermal Injection Devices: Hydrodynamic Versus Human Factors.

Authors:  Stijn Verwulgen; Koen Beyers; Timothi Van Mulder; Thomas Peeters; Steven Truijen; Francis Dams; Vanessa Vankerckhoven
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Vaccinating children in high-endemic rabies regions: what are we waiting for?

Authors:  Patrick Soentjens; Nicole Berens-Riha; Yven Van Herrewege; Pierre Van Damme; Emmanuel Bottieau; Raffaella Ravinetto
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.