Literature DB >> 21379418

Intradermal delivery of vaccines: potential benefits and current challenges.

J K Hickling1, K R Jones, M Friede, D Zehrung, D Chen, D Kristensen.   

Abstract

Delivery of vaccine antigens to the dermis and/or epidermis of human skin (i.e. intradermal delivery) might be more efficient than injection into the muscle or subcutaneous tissue, thereby reducing the volumes of antigen. This is known as dose-sparing and has been demonstrated in clinical trials with some, but not all, vaccines. Dose-sparing could be beneficial to immunization programmes by potentially reducing the costs of purchase, distribution and storage of vaccines; increasing vaccine availability and effectiveness. The data obtained with intradermal delivery of some vaccines are encouraging and warrant further study and development; however significant gaps in knowledge and operational challenges such as reformulation, optimizing vaccine presentation and development of novel devices to aid intradermal vaccine delivery need to be addressed. Modelling of the costs and potential savings resulting from intradermal delivery should be done to provide realistic expectations of the potential benefits and to support cases for investment. Implementation and uptake of intradermal vaccine delivery requires further research and development, which depends upon collaboration between multiple stakeholders in the field of vaccination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21379418      PMCID: PMC3044245          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.10.079426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  30 in total

1.  Rabies vaccines. WHO position paper.

Authors: 
Journal:  Wkly Epidemiol Rec       Date:  2007-12-07

2.  Evaluation of the clinical performance of a new intradermal vaccine administration technique and associated delivery system.

Authors:  Philippe E Laurent; Stephane Bonnet; Paul Alchas; Paulina Regolini; John A Mikszta; Ronald Pettis; Noel G Harvey
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Intradermal hepatitis B vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Sangaré; Lisa Manhart; Darin Zehrung; Chia C Wang
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Intradermal immunization: an alternative route for vaccine administration. Articles as per sessions meeting report.

Authors:  V Picot
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Worldwide progress in introducing pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, 2000-2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  Wkly Epidemiol Rec       Date:  2008-10-24

6.  Intradermal influenza vaccine for older adults: a randomized controlled multicenter phase III study.

Authors:  Robert Arnou; Giancarlo Icardi; Marijke De Decker; Arvydas Ambrozaitis; Marie-Pierre Kazek; Françoise Weber; Pierre Van Damme
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  A phase I evaluation of inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine administered by the intradermal or the intramuscular route.

Authors:  Shital M Patel; Robert L Atmar; Hana M El Sahly; Thomas R Cate; Wendy A Keitel
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Formulation and coating of microneedles with inactivated influenza virus to improve vaccine stability and immunogenicity.

Authors:  Yeu-Chun Kim; Fu-Shi Quan; Richard W Compans; Sang-Moo Kang; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Superior immunogenicity of inactivated whole virus H5N1 influenza vaccine is primarily controlled by Toll-like receptor signalling.

Authors:  Felix Geeraedts; Nadege Goutagny; Veit Hornung; Martina Severa; Aalzen de Haan; Judith Pool; Jan Wilschut; Katherine A Fitzgerald; Anke Huckriede
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Intradermal influenza vaccination of healthy adults using a new microinjection system: a 3-year randomised controlled safety and immunogenicity trial.

Authors:  Jiri Beran; Arvydas Ambrozaitis; Alvydas Laiskonis; Narseta Mickuviene; Patrick Bacart; Yvan Calozet; Etienne Demanet; Stephane Heijmans; Paul Van Belle; Françoise Weber; Camille Salamand
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  50 in total

1.  Intradermal or Sublingual Delivery and Heat-Labile Enterotoxin Proteins Shape Immunologic Responses to a CFA/I Fimbria-Derived Subunit Antigen Vaccine against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Milton Maciel; David Bauer; Robin L Baudier; Jacob Bitoun; John D Clements; Steven T Poole; Mark A Smith; Robert W Kaminski; Stephen J Savarino; Elizabeth B Norton
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Assessment of acceptability and usability of new delivery prototype device for intradermal vaccination in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Timothi J S Van Mulder; Stijn Verwulgen; Koen C L Beyers; Linda Scheelen; Monique M Elseviers; Pierre Van Damme; Vanessa Vankerckhoven
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Laser vaccine adjuvants. History, progress, and potential.

Authors:  Satoshi Kashiwagi; Timothy Brauns; Jeffrey Gelfand; Mark C Poznansky
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Effective and lesion-free cutaneous influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Ji Wang; Bo Li; Mei X Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of immunogenicity between intradermal and intramuscular injections of repeated annual identical influenza virus strains post-pandemic (2011-2012) in COPD patients.

Authors:  Benjamas Chuaychoo; Uraiwan Kositanont; Parichat Niyomthong; Nuttapol Rittayamai; Sorachai Srisuma; Kanokwan Rattanasaengloet; Walaiporn Wongsrisakunkaew; Julalux Thongam; Thaweesak Songserm
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Fluzone® intra-dermal (Intanza®/Istivac® Intra-dermal): An updated overview.

Authors:  Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Andrea Orsi; Filippo Ansaldi; Roberto Gasparini; Giancarlo Icardi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Reliability and accuracy of intradermal injection by Mantoux technique, hypodermic needle adapter, and hollow microneedle in pigs.

Authors:  James J Norman; Jyoti Gupta; Samirkumar R Patel; Sara Park; Courtney Jarrahian; Darin Zehrung; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.617

8.  Transcutaneous yellow fever vaccination of subjects with or without atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Mark K Slifka; Donald Y M Leung; Erika Hammarlund; Hans-Peter Raué; Eric L Simpson; Susan Tofte; Shahana Baig-Lewis; Gloria David; Henry Lynn; Rob Woolson; Tissa Hata; Henry Milgrom; Jon Hanifin
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Hollow microneedles for intradermal injection fabricated by sacrificial micromolding and selective electrodeposition.

Authors:  James J Norman; Seong-O Choi; Nhien T Tong; Avishek R Aiyar; Samirkumar R Patel; Mark R Prausnitz; Mark G Allen
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 10.  Rotavirus epidemiology and vaccine demand: considering Bangladesh chapter through the book of global disease burden.

Authors:  Abdullah Mahmud-Al-Rafat; Abdul Muktadir; Hasneen Muktadir; Mahbubul Karim; Arpan Maheshwari; Mohammad Mainul Ahasan
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.