Literature DB >> 25527661

Protein requirements of healthy pregnant women during early and late gestation are higher than current recommendations.

Trina V Stephens1, Magdalene Payne1, Ronald O Ball2, Paul B Pencharz3, Rajavel Elango4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate maternal dietary protein intake is necessary for healthy pregnancy. However, current protein intake recommendations for healthy pregnant women are based on factorial calculations of nitrogen balance data derived from nonpregnant adults. Thus, an estimate of protein requirements based on pregnancy-specific data is needed.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine protein requirements of healthy pregnant women at 11-20 (early) and 31-38 (late) wk of gestation through use of the indicator amino acid oxidation method.
METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy women (24-37 y) each randomly received a different test protein intake (range: 0.22-2.56 g · kg(-1) · d(-1)) during each study day in early (n = 35 observations in 17 women) and late (n = 43 observations in 19 women) gestation; 7 women participated in both early and late gestation studies. The diets were isocaloric and provided energy at 1.7 × resting energy expenditure. Protein was given as a crystalline amino acid mixture based on egg protein composition, except phenylalanine and tyrosine, which were maintained constant across intakes. Protein requirements were determined by measuring the oxidation rate of L-[1-(13)C]phenylalanine to (13)CO2 (F(13)CO2). Breath and urine samples were collected at baseline and isotopic steady state. Linear regression crossover analysis identified a breakpoint (requirement) at minimal F(13)CO2 in response to different protein intakes.
RESULTS: The estimated average requirement (EAR) for protein in early and late gestation was determined to be 1.22 (R(2) = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.66 g · kg(-1) · d(-1)) and 1.52 g · kg(-1) · d(-1) (R(2) = 0.63; 95% CI: 1.28, 1.77 g · kg(-1) · d(-1)), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These estimates are considerably higher than the EAR of 0.88 g · kg(-1) · d(-1) currently recommended by the Dietary Reference Intakes. To our knowledge, this study is the first to directly estimate gestational stage-specific protein requirements in healthy pregnant women and suggests that current recommendations based on factorial calculations underestimate requirements. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01784198.
© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IAAO; human; pregnancy; protein; requirements; stable isotopes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25527661     DOI: 10.3945/jn.114.198622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  17 in total

Review 1.  Protein and Amino Acid Requirements during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajavel Elango; Ronald O Ball
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Medical nutrition therapy and dietary counseling for patients with diabetes-energy, carbohydrates, protein intake and dietary counseling.

Authors:  Toshimasa Yamauchi; Hideki Kamiya; Kazunori Utsunomiya; Hirotaka Watada; Daiji Kawanami; Junko Sato; Munehiro Kitada; Daisuke Koya; Norio Harada; Kenichiro Shide; Erina Joo; Ryo Suzuki; Ryotaro Bouchi; Yasuharu Ohta; Tatsuya Kondo
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2020-07-25

Review 3.  Revised Reference Values for the Intake of Protein.

Authors:  Margrit Richter; Kurt Baerlocher; Jürgen M Bauer; Ibrahim Elmadfa; Helmut Heseker; Eva Leschik-Bonnet; Gabriele Stangl; Dorothee Volkert; Peter Stehle
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.374

4.  Dietary phenylalanine requirements during early and late gestation in healthy pregnant women.

Authors:  Madeleine A Ennis; Betina F Rasmussen; Kenneth Lim; Ronald O Ball; Paul B Pencharz; Glenda Courtney-Martin; Rajavel Elango
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Pregnant women have inadequate fiber intake while consuming fiber-rich diets in low-income rural setting: Evidences from Analysis of common "ready-to-eat" stable foods.

Authors:  Taddese Alemu Zerfu; Aleme Mekuria
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  Estimation of protein requirements in Indian pregnant women using a whole-body potassium counter.

Authors:  Rebecca Kuriyan; Saba Naqvi; Kishor G Bhat; Tinku Thomas; Annamma Thomas; Shirley George; Sheela C Nagarajarao; Harshpal Singh Sachdev; Thomas Preston; Anura V Kurpad
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Nitrogen fixation and nifH diversity in human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Katsura Igai; Manabu Itakura; Suguru Nishijima; Hirohito Tsurumaru; Wataru Suda; Takumi Tsutaya; Eriko Tomitsuka; Kiyoshi Tadokoro; Jun Baba; Shingo Odani; Kazumi Natsuhara; Ayako Morita; Minoru Yoneda; Andrew R Greenhill; Paul F Horwood; Jun-Ichi Inoue; Moriya Ohkuma; Yuichi Hongoh; Taro Yamamoto; Peter M Siba; Masahira Hattori; Kiwamu Minamisawa; Masahiro Umezaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Protein Requirements Are Elevated in Endurance Athletes after Exercise as Determined by the Indicator Amino Acid Oxidation Method.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kato; Katsuya Suzuki; Makoto Bannai; Daniel R Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Association of Maternal Protein Intake during Pregnancy in Humans with Maternal and Offspring Insulin Sensitivity Measures.

Authors:  Brittany R Allman; Aline Andres; Elisabet Børsheim
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2019-04-20

10.  Egg Intake and Dietary Quality among Overweight and Obese Mexican-American Postpartum Women.

Authors:  Sonia Vega-López; Giselle A P Pignotti; Michael Todd; Colleen Keller
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.