Literature DB >> 25523315

Using Grounded Theory Method to Capture and Analyze Health Care Experiences.

Geraldine Foley1, Virpi Timonen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Grounded theory (GT) is an established qualitative research method, but few papers have encapsulated the benefits, limits, and basic tenets of doing GT research on user and provider experiences of health care services. GT can be used to guide the entire study method, or it can be applied at the data analysis stage only.
METHODS: We summarize key components of GT and common GT procedures used by qualitative researchers in health care research. We draw on our experience of conducting a GT study on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients' experiences of health care services.
FINDINGS: We discuss why some approaches in GT research may work better than others, particularly when the focus of study is hard-to-reach population groups. We highlight the flexibility of procedures in GT to build theory about how people engage with health care services.
CONCLUSION: GT enables researchers to capture and understand health care experiences. GT methods are particularly valuable when the topic of interest has not previously been studied. GT can be applied to bring structure and rigor to the analysis of qualitative data. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grounded theory; health care experiences; qualitative interviews; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25523315      PMCID: PMC4545354          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  19 in total

Review 1.  How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.

Authors:  K J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Analyzing qualitative data with computer software.

Authors:  E A Weitzman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Qualitative research and the profound grasp of the obvious.

Authors:  R E Hurley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?

Authors:  S Sofaer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.

Authors:  M Q Patton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research.

Authors:  N Mays; C Pope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-01

7.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Linking data to decision-making: applying qualitative data analysis methods and software to identify mechanisms for using outcomes data.

Authors:  Vaishali N Patel; Anne W Riley
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 1.505

9.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult?

Authors:  Gail Ewing; Margaret Rogers; Stephen Barclay; Janet McCabe; Anna Martin; Chris Todd
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.762

View more
  63 in total

1.  Experiencing one's own body and body image in living kidney donors-A sociological and psychological study.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kowal; Mateusz Zatorski; Artur Kwiatkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Processing Information After a Child's Cancer Diagnosis-How Parents Learn.

Authors:  Cheryl C Rodgers; Kristin Stegenga; Janice S Withycombe; Karen Sachse; Katherine Patterson Kelly
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Optimizing outpatient total hip arthroplasty: perspectives of key stakeholders.

Authors:  Laura Churchill; Michael Pollock; Yekaterina Lebedeva; Nicholas Pasic; Dianne Bryant; James Howard; Brent Lanting; Debbie Laliberte Rudman
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Resident Choice: A Nursing Home Staff Perspective on Tensions and Resolutions.

Authors:  Jennifer A Palmer; Victoria A Parker; Dan Berlowitz; A Lynn Snow; Christine W Hartmann
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.361

5.  Preemptive pharmacogenetic testing: exploring the knowledge and perspectives of US payers.

Authors:  Nicholas J Keeling; Meagen M Rosenthal; Donna West-Strum; Amit S Patel; Cyrine E Haidar; James M Hoffman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  A Qualitative Focus Group Study to Illuminate the Lived Emotional and Social Impacts of Cancer and Its Treatment on Young Adults.

Authors:  David Victorson; Sofia F Garcia; Stacy Sanford; Mallory A Snyder; Sara Lampert; John M Salsman
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.223

7.  Poverty, Neighborhoods, Persistent Stress, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Outcomes: A Qualitative Study of the Patients' Perspective.

Authors:  Edward Yelin; Laura Trupin; Jared Bunde; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  "The More They Know, the Better Care They Can Give": Patient Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

Authors:  Francesca M Nicosia; Malena J Spar; Alicia Neumann; Molly C Silvestrini; Maureen Barrientos; Rebecca T Brown
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Long-term Exercise After Pulmonary Rehabilitation (LEAP): Design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial of Tai Chi.

Authors:  Marilyn L Moy; Peter M Wayne; Daniel Litrownik; Douglas Beach; Elizabeth S Klings; Roger B Davis; Gloria Y Yeh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Patient Experience during the Support, Educate, Empower Glaucoma Coaching Program to Improve Medication Adherence: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Cecilia N Hollenhorst; Vanessa Elliott; Michele Heisler; Kevin Schneider; Ken Resnicow; Paula Anne Newman-Casey
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.