Literature DB >> 25519992

Apparent power-law distributions in animal movements can arise from intraspecific interactions.

Greg A Breed1, Paul M Severns2, Andrew M Edwards3.   

Abstract

Lévy flights have gained prominence for analysis of animal movement. In a Lévy flight, step-lengths are drawn from a heavy-tailed distribution such as a power law (PL), and a large number of empirical demonstrations have been published. Others, however, have suggested that animal movement is ill fit by PL distributions or contend a state-switching process better explains apparent Lévy flight movement patterns. We used a mix of direct behavioural observations and GPS tracking to understand step-length patterns in females of two related butterflies. We initially found movement in one species (Euphydryas editha taylori) was best fit by a bounded PL, evidence of a Lévy flight, while the other (Euphydryas phaeton) was best fit by an exponential distribution. Subsequent analyses introduced additional candidate models and used behavioural observations to sort steps based on intraspecific interactions (interactions were rare in E. phaeton but common in E. e. taylori). These analyses showed a mixed-exponential is favoured over the bounded PL for E. e. taylori and that when step-lengths were sorted into states based on the influence of harassing conspecific males, both states were best fit by simple exponential distributions. The direct behavioural observations allowed us to infer the underlying behavioural mechanism is a state-switching process driven by intraspecific interactions rather than a Lévy flight.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lévy flight; animal movement; animal movement models; correlated random walk; diffusion; optimal search

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25519992      PMCID: PMC4305407          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  37 in total

1.  The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Foray search: an effective systematic dispersal strategy in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  L Conradt; P A Zollner; T J Roper; K Frank; C D Thomas
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-06-10       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  A diffusion-based theory of organism dispersal in heterogeneous populations.

Authors:  Garrick T Skalski; James F Gilliam
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Optimizing the success of random searches.

Authors:  G M Viswanathan; S V Buldyrev; S Havlin; M G da Luz; E P Raposo; H E Stanley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Fitness consequences of choosy oviposition for a time-limited butterfly.

Authors:  Patricia Doak; Peter Kareiva; Joel Kingsolver
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Optimal foraging: Lévy pattern or process?

Authors:  M J Plank; A James
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour.

Authors:  David W Sims; Emily J Southall; Nicolas E Humphries; Graeme C Hays; Corey J A Bradshaw; Jonathan W Pitchford; Alex James; Mohammed Z Ahmed; Andrew S Brierley; Mark A Hindell; David Morritt; Michael K Musyl; David Righton; Emily L C Shepard; Victoria J Wearmouth; Rory P Wilson; Matthew J Witt; Julian D Metcalfe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  State-space models of individual animal movement.

Authors:  Toby A Patterson; Len Thomas; Chris Wilcox; Otso Ovaskainen; Jason Matthiopoulos
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 9.  Random walk models in biology.

Authors:  Edward A Codling; Michael J Plank; Simon Benhamou
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer.

Authors:  Andrew M Edwards; Richard A Phillips; Nicholas W Watkins; Mervyn P Freeman; Eugene J Murphy; Vsevolod Afanasyev; Sergey V Buldyrev; M G E da Luz; E P Raposo; H Eugene Stanley; Gandhimohan M Viswanathan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  How ants move: individual and collective scaling properties.

Authors:  Riccardo Gallotti; Dante R Chialvo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Low relative error in consumer-grade GPS units make them ideal for measuring small-scale animal movement patterns.

Authors:  Greg A Breed; Paul M Severns
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.