Literature DB >> 25516234

Identification of risk categories for in pancreaticoduodenectomy based on diagnosis.

Christopher R Shubert1, Michael L Kendrick, Kristine M Thomsen, Michael B Farnell, Elizabeth B Habermann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) frequently overlook diagnosis as a variable when evaluating postoperative outcomes or generically group patients according to whether they have 'benign' or 'malignant' disease. Large multicentre studies comparing postoperative outcomes in PD stratified by diagnosis are lacking. The present study was conducted to verify the hypothesis that postoperative morbidity and length of stay (LoS) following PD vary by diagnosis and that patients may be grouped into low- and high-risk categories.
METHODS: The database of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was reviewed for all PDs performed during 2005-2011. Diagnoses were identified using ICD-9 codes and grouped based on the incidence of major morbidity. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to assess the impact of diagnosis on PD outcomes.
RESULTS: Of 5537 patients, those with pancreas cancer (n = 3173) and chronic pancreatitis (n = 485) experienced similar incidences of major morbidity (P = 0.95) and were grouped as having low-risk diagnoses. Patients with bile duct and ampullary (n = 1181), duodenal (n = 558) and neuroendocrine (n = 140) disease experienced similar levels of major morbidity (P = 0.78) and were grouped as having high-risk diagnoses. A high-risk diagnosis was identified as an independent risk factor for a prolonged LoS [odds ratio (OR) 1.67], organ space infection (OR 2.57), sepsis or septic shock (OR 1.83), and major morbidity (OR 1.70). Diagnosis did not predict readmission.
CONCLUSIONS: The high-risk diagnosis is independently associated with postoperative morbidity and prolonged LoS. Patients with PD should be stratified by diagnosis to more accurately reflect their risk for postoperative complications and the complexity of care they will require.
© 2014 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25516234      PMCID: PMC4402054          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  25 in total

1.  Are the results of pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer improving?

Authors:  G G Tsiotos; M B Farnell; M G Sarr
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Less morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Sohei Satoi; Soichiro Takai; Yoichi Matsui; Naoyoshi Terakawa; Ryuji Iwaki; Jyunichi Fukui; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Kanji Takahashi; Hideyoshi Toyokawa; Hiroshi Araki; A-Hon Kwon; Yasuo Kamiyama
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Management of pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 437 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Kevork K Kazanjian; Oscar J Hines; Guido Eibl; Howard A Reber
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-09

4.  Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yin-Mo Yang; Xiao-Dong Tian; Yan Zhuang; Wei-Min Wang; Yuan-Lian Wan; Yan-Ting Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

6.  Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S M M de Castro; O R C Busch; T M van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.

Authors:  D J Gouma; R C van Geenen; T M van Gulik; R J de Haan; L T de Wit; O R Busch; H Obertop
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt; M A Talamini; R H Hruban; S E Ord; P K Sauter; J Coleman; M L Zahurak; L B Grochow; R A Abrams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; M M Maher; P K Sauter; M L Zahurak; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy does not completely mitigate increased perioperative risks in elderly patients.

Authors:  May C Tee; Kristopher P Croome; Christopher R Shubert; Michael B Farnell; Mark J Truty; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Rory L Smoot; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Comparison of observed to predicted outcomes using the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Harveshp D Mogal; Nora Fino; Clancy Clark; Perry Shen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Are Combined Procedures Justified?

Authors:  Cornelius A Thiels; John R Bergquist; Danuel V Laan; Kristopher P Croome; Rory L Smoot; David M Nagorney; Geoffrey B Thompson; Michael L Kendrick; Michael B Farnell; Mark J Truty
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Giovanni Taffurelli; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-09-07

5.  Risk by indication for pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients 80 years and older: a study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  John R Bergquist; Christopher R Shubert; Daniel S Ubl; Cornelius A Thiels; Michael L Kendrick; Mark J Truty; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Gastric cancer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: Experience from a high-volume center and review of existing literature.

Authors:  Michael Johannes Pflüger; Matthäus Felsenstein; Ryan Schmocker; Laura DeLong Wood; Ralph Hruban; Kohei Fujikura; Noah Rozich; Floortje van Oosten; Matthew Weiss; William Burns; Jun Yu; John Cameron; Johann Pratschke; Christopher Lee Wolfgang; Jin He; Richard Andrew Burkhart
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2020-08-16

7.  Metabolic Syndrome is Associated with Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Hospital Resource Utilization in Patients Undergoing Elective Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  May C Tee; Daniel S Ubl; Elizabeth B Habermann; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick; Michael G Sarr; Mark J Truty; Florencia G Que; Kmarie Reid-Lombardo; Rory L Smoot; Michael B Farnell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.