Literature DB >> 25516203

A New Interpretation of the Weighted Kappa Coefficients.

Sophie Vanbelle1.   

Abstract

Reliability and agreement studies are of paramount importance. They do contribute to the quality of studies by providing information about the amount of error inherent to any diagnosis, score or measurement. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies were recently provided. While the use of the kappa-like family is advised for categorical and ordinal scales, no further guideline in the choice of a weighting scheme is given. In the present paper, a new simple and practical interpretation of the linear- and quadratic-weighted kappa coefficients is given. This will help researchers in motivating their choice of a weighting scheme.

Keywords:  agreement; linear; ordinal scale; quadratic; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25516203     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-014-9439-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  10 in total

1.  Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Laurent Audigé; Stig Brorson; Allan Donner; Byron J Gajewski; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Chris Roberts; Mohamed Shoukri; David L Streiner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter.

Authors:  Werner Vach
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories.

Authors:  H Brenner; U Kliebsch
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; D V Cicchetti
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Methods for estimating the parameters of a linear model for ordered categorical data.

Authors:  S R Lipsitz
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Bias, prevalence and kappa.

Authors:  T Byrt; J Bishop; J B Carlin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  A proposed index for measuring agreement in test-retest studies.

Authors:  E Rogot; I D Goldberg
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1966-09
  10 in total
  21 in total

1.  Reply: "Computed tomography assessment of anterior ethmoidal canal dehiscence: Methodological issue on interobserver agreement".

Authors:  Angela Guarnizo; Thanh Nguyen; Rafael Glikstein; Nader Zakhari
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-07-02

2.  Reproducibility for pathological prognostic parameters of the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: statistical issue.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour; Maryam Majidi
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.801

3.  A Note on the Linearly and Quadratically Weighted Kappa Coefficients.

Authors:  Pingke Li
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  [A new method for agreement evaluation based on AC1].

Authors:  Jing-Wen Zhang; Jun Xu; Sheng-Li An
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-04-20

5.  An Alternative Interpretation of the Linearly Weighted Kappa Coefficients for Ordinal Data.

Authors:  Tarald O Kvålseth
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Drug-related hospital admissions in older adults: comparison of the Naranjo algorithm and an adjusted version of the Kramer algorithm.

Authors:  Beatrijs Mertens; Julie Hias; Laura Hellemans; Karolien Walgraeve; Isabel Spriet; Jos Tournoy; Lorenz Roger Van der Linden
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 1.710

7.  The Dependence of Chance-Corrected Weighted Agreement Coefficients on the Power Parameter of the Weighting Scheme: Analysis and Measurement.

Authors:  Rutger van Oest
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Speech Accuracy in Children With Speech Sound Disorders.

Authors:  Linye Jing; Maria I Grigos
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Test-Retest Reliability, Agreement and Responsiveness of Productivity Loss (iPCQ-VR) and Healthcare Utilization (TiCP-VR) Questionnaires for Sick Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

Authors:  Timo T Beemster; Judith M van Velzen; Coen A M van Bennekom; Michiel F Reneman; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-03

10.  Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers' evaluation of external supervision.

Authors:  Michael Schriver; Vincent Kalumire Cubaka; Peter Vedsted; Innocent Besigye; Per Kallestrup
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.