Literature DB >> 29549605

Test-Retest Reliability, Agreement and Responsiveness of Productivity Loss (iPCQ-VR) and Healthcare Utilization (TiCP-VR) Questionnaires for Sick Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

Timo T Beemster1,2,3, Judith M van Velzen4,5, Coen A M van Bennekom4,5, Michiel F Reneman6, Monique H W Frings-Dresen5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess test-retest reliability, agreement, and responsiveness of questionnaires on productivity loss (iPCQ-VR) and healthcare utilization (TiCP-VR) for sick-listed workers with chronic musculoskeletal pain who were referred to vocational rehabilitation. Methods Test-retest reliability and agreement was assessed with a 2-week interval. Responsiveness was assessed at discharge after a 15-week vocational rehabilitation (VR) program. Data was obtained from six Dutch VR centers. Test-retest reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa. Agreement was determined by Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), smallest detectable changes (on group and individual level), and percentage observed, positive and negative agreement. Responsiveness was determined with area under the curve (AUC) obtained from receiver operation characteristic (ROC). Results A sample of 52 participants on test-retest reliability and agreement, and a sample of 223 on responsiveness were included in the analysis. Productivity loss (iPCQ-VR): ICCs ranged from 0.52 to 0.90, kappa ranged from 0.42 to 0.96, and AUC ranged from 0.55 to 0.86. Healthcare utilization (TiCP-VR): ICC was 0.81, and kappa values of the single healthcare utilization items ranged from 0.11 to 1.00. Conclusions The iPCQ-VR showed good measurement properties on working status, number of hours working per week and long-term sick leave, and low measurement properties on short-term sick leave and presenteeism. The TiCP-VR showed adequate reliability on all healthcare utilization items together and medication use, but showed low measurement properties on the single healthcare utilization items.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; Healthcare utilization; Measurement properties; Productivity loss; Vocational rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29549605     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-9767-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  35 in total

Review 1.  Measuring and valuing productivity loss due to poor health: A critical review.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Nick Bansback; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Chris C Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

3.  Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's κ.

Authors:  Henrica C W de Vet; Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Otto S Hoekstra; Dirk L Knol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-04-12

4.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

5.  Test-retest Reliability and Correlations of 5 Global Measures Addressing At-work Productivity Loss in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases.

Authors:  Sarah Leggett; Antje van der Zee-Neuen; Annelies Boonen; Dorcas E Beaton; Mihai Bojinca; Ailsa Bosworth; Sabrina Dadoun; Bruno Fautrel; Sofia Hagel; Catherine Hofstetter; Diane Lacaille; Denise Linton; Carina Mihai; Ingemar F Petersson; Pam Rogers; Jamie C Sergeant; Carlo Sciré; Suzanne M M Verstappen
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important change of the Pain Disability Index in patients with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Remko Soer; Michiel F Reneman; Patrick C A J Vroomen; Patrick Stegeman; Maarten H Coppes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Measuring time input loss among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: validity and reliability of the Valuation of Lost Productivity questionnaire.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Nick Bansback; Jacek Kopec; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Donald L Patrick; Jordi Alonso; Paul W Stratford; Dirk L Knol; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The health and productivity cost burden of the "top 10" physical and mental health conditions affecting six large U.S. employers in 1999.

Authors:  Ron Z Goetzel; Kevin Hawkins; Ronald J Ozminkowski; Shaohung Wang
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.162

10.  Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions in Return-to-Work for Musculoskeletal, Pain-Related and Mental Health Conditions: An Update of the Evidence and Messages for Practitioners.

Authors:  K L Cullen; E Irvin; A Collie; F Clay; U Gensby; P A Jennings; S Hogg-Johnson; V Kristman; M Laberge; D McKenzie; S Newnam; A Palagyi; R Ruseckaite; D M Sheppard; S Shourie; I Steenstra; D Van Eerd; B C Amick
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  Measurement Properties of the Work Ability Score in Sick-Listed Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

Authors:  M Stienstra; M J A Edelaar; B Fritz; M F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-26

2.  The capability set for work - correlates of sustainable employability in workers with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D A M van Gorp; J J L van der Klink; F I Abma; P J Jongen; I van Lieshout; E P J Arnoldus; E A C Beenakker; H M Bos; J J J van Eijk; J Fermont; S T F M Frequin; K de Gans; G J D Hengstman; R M M Hupperts; J P Mostert; P H M Pop; W I M Verhagen; D Zemel; M A P Heerings; M F Reneman; H A M Middelkoop; L H Visser; K van der Hiele
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Predictors of Return to Work After High Tibial Osteotomy: The Importance of Being a Breadwinner.

Authors:  Alexander Hoorntje; P Paul F M Kuijer; Berbke T van Ginneken; Koen L M Koenraadt; Rutger C I van Geenen; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Ronald J van Heerwaarden
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-27

Review 4.  EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: A State-of-the-Art Review of Current Trends and Opportunities.

Authors:  Nazmi Sofian Suhaimi; James Mountstephens; Jason Teo
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-16

5.  Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the World Mental Health Japan version of the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire Short Version: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Norito Kawakami; Akiomi Inoue; Masao Tsuchiya; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Kotaro Imamura; Mako Iida; Daisuke Nishi
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  Vocational Rehabilitation for Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain With or Without a Work Module: An Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Timo T Beemster; Sybren J Welling; Jochen O Mierau; Hermien H Dijk
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

7.  Vocational Rehabilitation with or without Work Module for Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Sick Leave from Work: Longitudinal Impact on Work Participation.

Authors:  Timo T Beemster; Coen A M van Bennekom; Judith M van Velzen; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Michiel F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.