Literature DB >> 36066789

The Dependence of Chance-Corrected Weighted Agreement Coefficients on the Power Parameter of the Weighting Scheme: Analysis and Measurement.

Rutger van Oest1.   

Abstract

We consider the dependence of a broad class of chance-corrected weighted agreement coefficients on the weighting scheme that penalizes rater disagreements. The considered class encompasses many existing coefficients with any number of raters, and one real-valued power parameter defines the weighting scheme that includes linear, quadratic, identity, and radical weights. We obtain the first-order and second-order derivatives of the coefficients with respect to the power parameter and decompose them into components corresponding to all pairs of different category distances. Each component compares its two distances in terms of the ratio of observed to expected-by-chance frequency. A larger ratio for the smaller distance than the larger distance contributes to a positive relationship between the power parameter and the coefficient value; the opposite contributes to a negative relationship. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the coefficient value to increase or decrease and the relationship to intensify or weaken as the power parameter increases. We use the first-order and second-order derivatives for corresponding measurement. Furthermore, we show how these two derivatives allow other researchers to obtain quite accurate estimates of the coefficient value for unreported values of the power parameter, even without access to the original data.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  chance-corrected weighted agreement coefficients; coefficient susceptibility; interrater agreement; power parameter; weighting schemes

Year:  2022        PMID: 36066789     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-022-09881-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.290


  16 in total

1.  Reader agreement studies.

Authors:  Philip E Crewson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Variability in classification of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  N D Holmquist; C A McMahan; O D Williams
Journal:  Arch Pathol       Date:  1967-10

4.  Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories.

Authors:  H Brenner; U Kliebsch
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 5.  Kappa-like indices of observer agreement viewed from a latent class perspective.

Authors:  I Guggenmoos-Holzmann; R Vonk
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Prevalence of radiographic asbestosis in crocidolite miners and millers at Wittenoom, Western Australia.

Authors:  W O Cookson; N H De Klerk; A W Musk; B K Armstrong; J J Glancy; M S Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1986-07

7.  Development and validation of a clinical scale for the diagnosis of drug-induced hepatitis.

Authors:  V A Maria; R M Victorino
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 8.  Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic.

Authors:  M Maclure; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  The analysis of ordinal agreement data: beyond weighted kappa.

Authors:  P Graham; R Jackson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.