K W Bauer1,2, M D Marcus3, L El ghormli4, C L Ogden5, G D Foster1. 1. Center for Obesity Research and Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Department of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA. 5. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed how well body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), or waist to height ratio (WtHR) perform in identifying cardio-metabolic risk among youth. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of BMI and WC percentiles and WtHR to distinguish adolescents with and without cardio-metabolic risk. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of data from 6097 adolescents aged 10-13 years who participated in the HEALTHY study was conducted. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined the discriminatory ability of BMI and WC percentiles and WtHR. RESULTS: The discriminatory ability of BMI percentile was good (area under the curve [AUC] ≥ 0.80) for elevated insulin and clustering of ≥3 risk factors, with optimal cut-points of 96 and 95, respectively. BMI percentile performed poor to fair (AUC = 0.57-0.75) in identifying youth with the majority of individual risk factors examined (elevated glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, blood pressure, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein). WC percentile and WtHR performed similarly to BMI percentile. CONCLUSIONS: The current definition of obesity among US children performs well at identifying adolescents with elevated insulin and a clustering of ≥3 cardio-metabolic risk factors. Evidence does not support WC percentile or WtHR as superior screening tools compared with BMI percentile for identifying cardio-metabolic risk.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed how well body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), or waist to height ratio (WtHR) perform in identifying cardio-metabolic risk among youth. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of BMI and WC percentiles and WtHR to distinguish adolescents with and without cardio-metabolic risk. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of data from 6097 adolescents aged 10-13 years who participated in the HEALTHY study was conducted. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined the discriminatory ability of BMI and WC percentiles and WtHR. RESULTS: The discriminatory ability of BMI percentile was good (area under the curve [AUC] ≥ 0.80) for elevated insulin and clustering of ≥3 risk factors, with optimal cut-points of 96 and 95, respectively. BMI percentile performed poor to fair (AUC = 0.57-0.75) in identifying youth with the majority of individual risk factors examined (elevated glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, blood pressure, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein). WC percentile and WtHR performed similarly to BMI percentile. CONCLUSIONS: The current definition of obesity among US children performs well at identifying adolescents with elevated insulin and a clustering of ≥3 cardio-metabolic risk factors. Evidence does not support WC percentile or WtHR as superior screening tools compared with BMI percentile for identifying cardio-metabolic risk.
Authors: Ian Janssen; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Wei Chen; Robert M Malina; Claude Bouchard; Gerald S Berenson Journal: Obes Res Date: 2005-06
Authors: Robert J Kuczmarski; Cynthia L Ogden; Shumei S Guo; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Katherine M Flegal; Zuguo Mei; Rong Wei; Lester R Curtin; Alex F Roche; Clifford L Johnson Journal: Vital Health Stat 11 Date: 2002-05
Authors: Peter T Katzmarzyk; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Wei Chen; Robert M Malina; Claude Bouchard; Gerald S Berenson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jessica J Chiang; Julienne E Bower; Michael R Irwin; Shelley E Taylor; Andrew J Fuligni Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Jussara M do Carmo; Alexandre A da Silva; Zhen Wang; Taolin Fang; Nicola Aberdein; Cecilia E P de Lara Rodriguez; John E Hall Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: J H Taylor; Y Xu; F Li; M Shaw; J Dziura; S Caprio; W V Tamborlane; P Nowicka; M Savoye Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Rossana Gómez-Campos; Cinthya Lee Andruske; Jefferson Hespanhol; Jose Sulla Torres; Miguel Arruda; Cristian Luarte-Rocha; Marco Antonio Cossio-Bolaños Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.390