J H Taylor1,2, Y Xu3, F Li3, M Shaw4, J Dziura3, S Caprio4, W V Tamborlane4, P Nowicka5,6, M Savoye4. 1. Yale Child Study Center, New Haven, CT, USA. 2. Yale Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA. 3. Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. Yale Pediatric Endocrinology, New Haven, CT, USA. 5. Department of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 6. Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An important area of research in childhood obesity is the identification of factors that predict or moderate the responses to obesity intervention programmes, yet few studies have examined the impact of self-esteem and family functioning on obesity treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether baseline self-esteem and family functioning predicted or moderated childhood obesity intervention outcomes at 6 months. METHODS:From 2009 to 2011, seventy-five 10-16 year old, racially/ethnically diverse obese youths with abnormal glucose tolerance were randomized to 6 months of an intensive family-based obesity lifestyle intervention (Bright Bodies) or routine outpatient Clinic Care. We examined youth self-concept, parent-rated family functioning and 6-month outcomes (youths' glucose tolerance, weight, body mass index and percent fat). We set the significance threshold as P ≤ 0.05 for moderator and predictor analyzes. RESULTS: Having poor family functioning and self-concept scores indicating high anxiety and low self-esteem at baseline predicted poor 6-month outcomes overall (Bright Bodies and Clinic Care groups combined). Additionally, baseline self-esteem and family functioning moderated treatment effects such that Bright Bodies outperformed Clinic Care in youths with low self-esteem and poorly functioning families, whereas youths with high self-esteem and high-functioning families did similarly well with either intervention. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest intensive family-based lifestyle programmes are particularly beneficial for youth with low self-esteem and poorly functioning families.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: An important area of research in childhood obesity is the identification of factors that predict or moderate the responses to obesity intervention programmes, yet few studies have examined the impact of self-esteem and family functioning on obesity treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether baseline self-esteem and family functioning predicted or moderated childhood obesity intervention outcomes at 6 months. METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, seventy-five 10-16 year old, racially/ethnically diverse obese youths with abnormal glucose tolerance were randomized to 6 months of an intensive family-based obesity lifestyle intervention (Bright Bodies) or routine outpatient Clinic Care. We examined youth self-concept, parent-rated family functioning and 6-month outcomes (youths' glucose tolerance, weight, body mass index and percent fat). We set the significance threshold as P ≤ 0.05 for moderator and predictor analyzes. RESULTS: Having poor family functioning and self-concept scores indicating high anxiety and low self-esteem at baseline predicted poor 6-month outcomes overall (Bright Bodies and Clinic Care groups combined). Additionally, baseline self-esteem and family functioning moderated treatment effects such that Bright Bodies outperformed Clinic Care in youths with low self-esteem and poorly functioning families, whereas youths with high self-esteem and high-functioning families did similarly well with either intervention. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest intensive family-based lifestyle programmes are particularly beneficial for youth with low self-esteem and poorly functioning families.
Authors: Robert J Kuczmarski; Cynthia L Ogden; Shumei S Guo; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Katherine M Flegal; Zuguo Mei; Rong Wei; Lester R Curtin; Alex F Roche; Clifford L Johnson Journal: Vital Health Stat 11 Date: 2002-05
Authors: A Javed; M Jumean; M H Murad; D Okorodudu; S Kumar; V K Somers; O Sochor; F Lopez-Jimenez Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Mary Savoye; Melissa Shaw; James Dziura; William V Tamborlane; Paulina Rose; Cindy Guandalini; Rachel Goldberg-Gell; Tania S Burgert; Anna M G Cali; Ram Weiss; Sonia Caprio Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-06-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thao-Ly T Phan; Fang Fang Chen; Alison Taggi Pinto; Courtney Cox; Jennifer Robbins; Anne E Kazak Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Jerome H Taylor; Eli R Lebowitz; Ewgeni Jakubovski; Catherine G Coughlin; Wendy K Silverman; Michael H Bloch Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2017-09-28
Authors: Jerome H Taylor; Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger; Catherine Coughlin; Jilian Mulqueen; Jessica A Johnson; Daniel Gabriel; Margot O Reed; Ewgeni Jakubovski; Michael H Bloch Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Daniel H Sheinbein; Richard I Stein; Jacqueline F Hayes; Mackenzie L Brown; Katherine N Balantekin; Rachel P Kolko Conlon; Brian E Saelens; Michael G Perri; R Robinson Welch; Kenneth B Schechtman; Leonard H Epstein; Denise E Wilfley Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Rachel P Kolko Conlon; Kelly T Hurst; Jacqueline F Hayes; Katherine N Balantekin; Richard I Stein; Brian E Saelens; Mackenzie L Brown; Daniel H Sheinbein; R Robinson Welch; Michael G Perri; Kenneth B Schechtman; Leonard H Epstein; Denise E Wilfley Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 4.000