| Literature DB >> 25514223 |
Hsiu-Ju Wang1, Meng-Chun Pan2, Chao-Kai Chang3, Shu-Wei Chang4, Chang-Wei Hsieh5.
Abstract
This study reports on the optimization of the extraction conditions of cordycepin from Cordyceps militaris by using ultrasonication. For this purpose, the orthogonal experimental design was used to investigate the effects of factors on the ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE). Four factors: extraction time (min), ethanol concentration (%), extraction temperature (°C) and extraction frequency (kHz), were studied. The results showed that the highest cordycepin yield of 7.04 mg/g (86.98% ± 0.23%) was obtained with an extraction time of 60 min, ethanol concentration of 50%, extraction temperature of 65 °C and extraction frequency of 56 kHz. It was found that the cordycepin extraction yield increased with the effect of ultrasonication during the extraction process. Therefore, UAE can be used as an alternative to conventional immersion extraction with respect to the recovery of cordycepin from C. militaris, with the advantages of shorter extraction time and reduced solvent consumption.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25514223 PMCID: PMC6271585 DOI: 10.3390/molecules191220808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of cordycepin [15].
Figure 2Effect of extraction time on the extraction yield of cordycepin from C. militaris. Ethanol concentration: 50%; extraction temperature: 60 °C; ratio of liquid to solid: 20 mL/g; extraction frequency: 40 kHz.
Figure 3Effect of ethanol concentration on the extraction yield of cordycepin from C. militaris. Extraction time: 50 min; extraction temperature: 60 °C; ratio of liquid to solid: 20 mL/g; extraction frequency: 40 kHz.
Figure 4Effect of extraction temperature (°C) on the extraction yield of cordycepin from C. militaris. Extraction time: 50 min; ethanol concentration: 50%; ratio of liquid to solid: 20 mL/g; extraction frequency: 40 kHz.
Figure 5Effect of ratio of liquid to solid on the extraction yield of cordycepin from C. militaris. Extraction time: 50 min; ethanol concentration: 50%; extraction temperature: 60 °C; extraction frequency: 40 kHz.
Figure 6Effect of extraction frequency on the extraction yield of cordycepin from C. militaris. Extraction time: 50 min; ethanol concentration: 50%; extraction temperature: 60 °C; ratio of liquid to solid: 20 mL/g.
Factors and levels of orthogonal experimental design.
| Levels | Factors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |
| Extraction Time (min) | Ethanol Concentration (%) | Extraction Temperature (°C) | Extraction Frequency (kHz) | |
| 1 | 40 | 30 | 55 | 28 |
| 2 | 50 | 40 | 60 | 40 |
| 3 | 60 | 50 | 65 | 56 |
| 4 | 70 | 60 | 70 | 80 |
Orthogonal test design and results.
| EXP | Factors | Extraction Yield (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 60.03 ± 0.62 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 70.84 ± 0.56 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 75.41 ± 0.63 |
| 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 74.53 ± 0.57 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 80.67 ± 0.47 |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 77.93 ± 0.31 |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 82.23 ± 0.24 |
| 8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 81.43 ± 0.44 |
| 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 78.01 ± 0.63 |
| 10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 77.84 ± 0.52 |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 83.16 ± 0.54 |
| 12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 84.02 ± 0.33 |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 71.68 ± 0.65 |
| 14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 76.24 ± 0.23 |
| 15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 80.08 ± 0.34 |
| 16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 80.23 ± 0.44 |
| K1 | 280.81 | 290.39 | 290.39 | 302.52 | - |
| K2 | 322.26 | 302.85 | 302.85 | 307.11 | - |
| K3 | 323.03 | 320.88 | 311.09 | 314.15 | - |
| K4 | 308.23 | 320.21 | 306.28 | 310.55 | - |
| k1 | 70.20 | 72.60 | 72.60 | 75.63 | - |
| k2 | 80.57 | 75.71 | 75.71 | 76.78 | - |
| k3 | 80.76 | 80.22 | 77.77 | 78.54 | - |
| k4 | 77.06 | 80.05 | 76.57 | 77.64 | - |
| R | 10.56 | 7.62 | 5.18 | 2.91 | - |
Variance analysis of orthogonal test.
| Factors | SS | df | MS | F | P | Significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 292 | 3 | 97.270020 | 9.080411 | 0.051436 | ** |
| B | 163 | 3 | 54.187990 | 5.058590 | 0.108024 | * |
| C | 28 | 3 | 9.440320 | 0.881279 | 0.540148 | - |
| D | 18 | 3 | 6.149190 | 0.574043 | 0.670151 | - |
| Error | 32.1362 | 51 | 10.71207 | - | - | - |
| Total | 9.31 | 26 | - | - | - | - |
F0.01 (3,51) = 5.28 F0.05 (3,51) = 2.79; SS: Sum of square; df: Degree of freedom; MS: Mean of square; F: F-value; **: p < 0.01 (F > F0.01 (3,51)); *: p < 0.05 (F > F0.05 (3,51)); A: Extraction time; B: Ethanol concentration; C: Extraction temperature; D: Extraction frequency.
Comparison of UAE and conventional immersion extraction.
| Extraction Method | Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction | Immersion Extraction | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extraction time (h) | 1 | 1 | 24 |
| Extraction temperature (°C) | 65 | 65 | 65 |
| Ratio of liquid to solid (mL/g) | 1:20 | 1:250 | 1:250 |
| Recovery (%) | 86.98% ± 0.23% b | 21.43% ± 1.13% c | 95.23% ± 3.11% a |
Means of replicates ± S.E. (N = 3); a–c: The means in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.