Literature DB >> 25511293

Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients.

Folkert K Horn1, Jan Kremers, Christian Y Mardin, Anselm G Jünemann, Werner Adler, Ralf P Tornow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the potential of flicker-defined form (FDF) perimetry to detect functional loss in patient groups with beginning glaucoma, and to evaluate the dynamic range of the FDF stimulus in individual patients and at individual test positions.
METHODS: FDF perimetry and standard automated perimetry (SAP) were performed at identical test locations (adapted G1 protocol) in 60 healthy subjects and 111 glaucoma patients. All patients showed glaucomatous optic disc appearance. Grouping within the glaucoma cohort was based on SAP-performance: 33 "preperimetric" open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients, 28 "borderline" OAG (focal defects and SAP-mean defect (MD) <2 dB), 33 "early" OAG (SAP-MD < 5 dB), 17 "advanced" OAG. All participants were experienced in psychophysical and perimetric tests. Defect values and the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) in patient groups were statistically compared.
RESULTS: The values of FDF-MD in the preperimetric, borderline, and early OAG group were 2.7 ± 3.4 dB, 5.5 ± 2.6 dB, and 8.5 ± 3.4 dB respectively (all significantly above normal). The percentage of patients exceeding normal FDF-MD was 27.3 %, 60.7 %, and 87.9 % respectively. The age-adjusted FDF-mean defect (MD) of the G1X-protocol was not significantly correlated with refractive error, lens opacity, pupil size, or gender. Occurrence of ceiling effects (inability to detect targets at highest contrast) showed a high correlation with visual field losses (R = 0.72, p < 0.001). Local analysis indicates that SAP losses exceeding 5 dB could not be distinguished with the FDF technique.
CONCLUSION: The FDF stimulus was able to detect beginning glaucoma damage. Patients with SAP-MD values exceeding 5 dB should be monitored with conventional perimetry because of its larger dynamic range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25511293     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2887-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

Review 1.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head.

Authors:  J B Jonas; W M Budde; S Panda-Jonas
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  [Importance of flicker contrast tests in functional glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  K Göbel; C M Poloschek; C Erb; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Frequency doubling illusion: detection vs. form resolution.

Authors:  Patrick T Quaid; Trefford L Simpson; John G Flanagan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.

Authors:  Chota Matsumoto; Sonoko Takada; Sachiko Okuyama; Eiko Arimura; Shigeki Hashimoto; Yoshikazu Shimomura
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2006-04

5.  Light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry in glaucoma: a comparative study.

Authors:  B J Lachenmayr; S M Drance; G R Douglas; F S Mikelberg
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Perimetric measurements with flicker-defined form stimulation in comparison with conventional perimetry and retinal nerve fiber measurements.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Ralf P Tornow; Anselm G Jünemann; Robert Laemmer; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Two methods of lens opacity measurements in glaucomas.

Authors:  F K Horn; A G Jünemann; M Korth
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  C W Tyler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Structure-function relationship between FDF, FDT, SAP, and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Julia Lamparter; Richard A Russell; Andreas Schulze; Ann-Christin Schuff; Norbert Pfeiffer; Esther M Hoffmann
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Non-conventional perimetric methods in the detection of early glaucomatous functional damage.

Authors:  M L Salvetat; M Zeppieri; C Tosoni; L Parisi; P Brusini
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Functional disorders in the chronological progression of glaucoma].

Authors:  Carl Erb
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Differentiation of ocular hypertension].

Authors:  E M Hoffmann; J Lamparter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Structural and Functional Evaluations for the Early Detection of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Katie A Lucy; Gadi Wollstein
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-14

4.  Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Vicki Scharch; Christian Y Mardin; Robert Lämmer; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  A comparison of Goldmann III, V and spatially equated test stimuli in visual field testing: the importance of complete and partial spatial summation.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Barbara Zangerl; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.117

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.