Prolamins from grains have attracted intensive attention in recent years due to their potential in satisfying the demand for environmentally friendly (biodegradable), abundantly available (sustainable), and cost-effective biomaterials. However, for kafirin, the prolamin from sorghum, its composition, structure, morphology, and self-assembly behaviors have not been fully characterized. In this paper, kafirin was extracted from the whole sorghum grain and found to contain 68, 14, 6, and 12% of α-, β-, and γ-fractions and cross-linked kafirin, respectively. Freeze-dried kafirin contained ∼49% α-helix in the solid state. When dissolved in 65% (v/v) isopropanol, 60% (v/v) tert-butanol, and 85% (v/v) ethanol aqueous solvents, the relative α-helix content in kafirin increased with the decrease of solvent polarity. Structural analysis using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) indicated that kafirin (2 mg/mL) took stretched and extended conformations with dimensions of 118 × 15 × 15 and 100 × 11 × 11 Å in 60% tert-butanol and 65% isopropanol, respectively. More elongated conformation of individual kafirin with high-order assembly was observed in 85% ethanol. Protein aggregation occurred as protein concentration increased in its good solvent. The morphology of kafirin assemblies captured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed that kafirin protein took uniform particle morphology at low concentration, and disk-like or rod-like structures resulting from solvent evaporation induced particle interactions emerged at high concentrations. These results suggest that both protein concentration and solvent polarity can effectively regulate kafirin assemblies from thick rod-like to slim rod-like structures, a convenient way to tune the fibrillation of prolamin-based biomaterials.
Prolamins from grains have attracted intensive attention in recent years due to their potential in satisfying the demand for environmentally friendly (biodegradable), abundantly available (sustainable), and cost-effective biomaterials. However, for kafirin, the prolamin from sorghum, its composition, structure, morphology, and self-assembly behaviors have not been fully characterized. In this paper, kafirin was extracted from the whole sorghum grain and found to contain 68, 14, 6, and 12% of α-, β-, and γ-fractions and cross-linked kafirin, respectively. Freeze-dried kafirin contained ∼49% α-helix in the solid state. When dissolved in 65% (v/v) isopropanol, 60% (v/v) tert-butanol, and 85% (v/v) ethanol aqueous solvents, the relative α-helix content in kafirin increased with the decrease of solvent polarity. Structural analysis using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) indicated that kafirin (2 mg/mL) took stretched and extended conformations with dimensions of 118 × 15 × 15 and 100 × 11 × 11 Å in 60% tert-butanol and 65% isopropanol, respectively. More elongated conformation of individual kafirin with high-order assembly was observed in 85% ethanol. Protein aggregation occurred as protein concentration increased in its good solvent. The morphology of kafirin assemblies captured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed that kafirin protein took uniform particle morphology at low concentration, and disk-like or rod-like structures resulting from solvent evaporation induced particle interactions emerged at high concentrations. These results suggest that both protein concentration and solvent polarity can effectively regulate kafirin assemblies from thick rod-like to slim rod-like structures, a convenient way to tune the fibrillation of prolamin-based biomaterials.
Growing research interest
in protein-based biomaterials has been
stimulated by the demand for alternatives to traditional synthetic
polymers that have expanded functional properties to accommodate a
broader spectrum of applications.[1] Among
various protein candidates, zein, the prolamin protein in maize, has
received increasing research attention.[2,3] The composition,
structure, dissolution, and gelation behavior of zein have been extensively
studied.[4−7] Due to its unique properties, such as its solubility in aqueous
alcohol, highly hydrophobic and nonallergenic nature, excellent oxygen
barrier property, reduced susceptibility to proteolytic degradation,
and ability to withstand gastric pH, zein is considered superior to
other proteins, especially in the food packaging and drug delivery
applications. Currently, research projects intended to explore its
applications in tissue scaffolding, active ingredient encapsulation,
and drug delivery are in full swing.[8−10]Kafirin, the sorghum
prolamin protein, resembles zein in its solubility,
molecular weight, amino acid composition, and structure of polypeptides.[11,12] Compared to zein, kafirin is relatively more hydrophobic and less
digestible,[13,14] which enables more stable films
with superior gas and water vapor barrier characteristics. It is a
more effective encapsulation vehicle with stronger protective function.[15] Therefore, kafirin has the potential to be an
alternative to zein in biomaterial applications. Nevertheless, the
effort to fulfill its potential is still seriously lacking. Of all
the available research papers, only a few report kafirin’s
satisfying performance in film casting application.[16−19]Many factors, such as protein
composition, purity, concentration,
secondary and tertiary structures, morphology, and self-assembly behavior,
are known to affect the processing performance and functional properties
of protein-based biomaterials.[20] To develop
biomaterials from kafirin, it is necessary to understand the physical
properties of kafirin in the first place. Although extraction methods
and digestibility of kafirin received adequate research attentions,
a clear view of the secondary structure, morphology, and self-assembly
phenomena of kafirin and their relationship with processing properties
is still absent.In this presented work, we carried out a detailed
investigation
of kafirin on its composition, structure, morphology, and self-assembly
behavior. The components of kafirin extracted from sorghum grain using
60% tert-butanol were identified on the basis of
sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
The secondary structure was characterized using Fourier transform
infrared (FTIR) and circular dichroism (CD) in solid and liquid states.
The morphology and self-assembly behavior of kafirin in different
alcohol solutions were studied by synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering
(SAXS) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Key parameters affecting
kafirin structure based on these measurements were obtained, and the
results are very relevant in guiding future investigation of kafirin-based
biomaterials with designed quality.
Materials
and Methods
Materials
Whole food-grade retail sorghum grain (Sorghum bicolor Moench) was purchased from Northern
Food Inc. (Hicksville, NY, USA). Commercial zein (260-01283) was purchased
from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (New York, NY, USA). Tris-alkali,
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine
(TEMED), 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME), bromophenol blue, Coomassie brilliant
blue G-250, and prestained protein markers (broad range protein maker)
were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Hercules, CA, USA).
Milli-Q water was used throughout the experiments.
Preparation
of Kafirin by Ultrasound-Assisted tert-Butanol Extraction
Whole sorghum grain was milled to 40
mesh, and lipid was first removed from milled grain with n-hexane. The defatted flour was then extracted at room temperature
with water followed by 0.5 M NaCl (the ratio of raw material to extract
solution is 1:10) three times each (1 h each). At the end of each
extraction cycle, the dispersion was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10
min and the supernatant was discarded to fully separate out the albumin
and globulin proteins. The residue was then washed with distilled
water three times in a similar way to remove salt. The remnants were
then extracted by using 60% tert-butanol twice for
2 h each and 10 min of ultrasonication using an FS-28 solid-state
ultrasonicator (bath type with sonic power, 225 W; sweep frequency,
40 kHz) (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) at the interval of
30 min. The extract fraction was then centrifuged at 8000 rpm for
15 min, and the supernatant was then freeze-dried directly. Because
the first extraction fraction contains pink color due to the coextraction
of alcohol-soluble impurities, only the second extraction fraction
was kept for further analysis. The second extract fraction powder
has a white color, and the protein content was determined as 87% by
combustion method with a nitrogen analyzer (FP-428, Leco Corp., St.
Joseph, MI, USA) calibrated with analytical reagent grade EDTA (a
factor of 6.25 was used to convert the nitrogen to protein).
Sodium
Dodecyl Sulfate–Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE)
Three milligrams of protein was denatured and
reduced by heating samples at 95 °C for 5 min in 1 mL of loading
buffer containing 0.01 mol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 6.8), 2% (w/v) SDS,
10%(v/v) glycerol, and 5% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol (2-ME). The
prestained protein marker (molecular weights ranging from 6.5 to 110.3
kDa) was used. Commercial zein was run under reducing condition as
a control. Each sample solution (10 μL) or protein marker was
loaded onto discontinuous sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel
with 4% stacking gel and 12% separating gel. Migration was done in
a Bio-Rad Mini-Protean II system under 90 V for 2 h. Gel was stained
with 0.1% Coomassie brilliant blue G 250 in 45% methanol and 10% acetic
acid and destained in solution with the composition ratio of methanol/acetic
acid/water = 1:1:8, v/v/v. Gel was scanned by Bio-Rad Universal Hood
II gel imaging system, and densitometry analysis was performed using
Image J 2.1.4.7 software.
Amino Acid Composition Analysis
Seventy-five milligrams
of kafirin was placed in a 20 mL ampule and mixed with 10 mL of 6
M HCl. After sealing, the protein was hydrolyzed at 110 °C for
22 h under vacuum. The hydrolysate was then dried under vacuum at
60 °C. The dried sample was dissolved in 3–5 mL of 0.2
M sodium citrate buffer (pH 2.2) to yield an amino acid concentration
of 50–250 nmol/mL. The protein solution was filtered through
a 0.2 μm syringe filter and loaded onto a Hitachi L-8800 amino
acid analyzer (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Hitachi 2622SC ion-exchange
column for amino acid composition analysis.
Attenuated Total Reflectance
Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR)
Spectroscopy
ATR-FTIR spectra were collected by a Thermal
Nicolet Nexus 670 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corp., Madison,
WI, USA). Kafirin protein powder was wrapped in aluminum foil and
pressed into a flat pellet by hand to ensure good contact with the
ATR crystal. Each spectrum was collected at wavenumber range from
4000 to 600 cm–1 and averaged over 256 scans with
4 cm–1 resolution. With the aid of OMNIC 7.2 software,
the original FTIR spectrum was then smoothed with smoothing points
(11, 21.213 cm–1). Second-derivative (Savitsky–Golay
derivative) analysis in the wavenumber ranging from 1700 to 1520 cm–1, which covered the typical amide I and amide II peaks,
was then conducted to identify positions of individual component peaks.
With the assistance of Origin 9.0 software, multiple-peak fitting
was conducted by fitting peak positions obtained from second-derivative
to Gaussian functions. On the basis of the attribution relationship
between component peaks and types of secondary structure, the ratio
of secondary structure was determined by calculating the peak area
ratio.
Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy
CD spectra were
collected at 25 °C using an AVIV model 400 circular dichroism
spectrometer equipped with 0.1 cm path length quartz cuvettes (model
110-OS, Hellma, USA). Wavelength scans were conducted from 190 to
260 nm with a bandwidth of 1 nm. Samples, with protein concentration
of 0.2 mg/mL, were filtered by 0.45 μm membrane (Millipore,
Ireland) before testing. Three scanning acquisitions were gathered,
and one representative set of spectra was collected. For each spectrum,
the medium baseline was subtracted and mean residue ellipticity (MRE)
(mdeg·cm2/dmol) versus wavelength was plotted.[21] It was calculated as [θ]λ = MRWθλ/10dc, where the average molecular weight of an amino acid
residue is 109.867 g/mol, θλ is the measured ellipticity
at the specific wavelength in mdeg, c is the concentration
of protein in g/mL, and d is the path length in cm.
Secondary structure estimation was processed by curve fitting with
reference CD curves of α-helix, β-sheet, random coil,
and β-turn conformations.
Synchrotron
Small-Angle X-ray Scattering
SAXS data
were collected at Bio-CAT, 18-ID beam line section, at the Advanced
Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. Freshly prepared kafirin
(2 mg/mL) in 60% (v/v) tert-butanol, 65% isopropanol,
and 85% ethanol aqueous solutions was examined. The X-ray wavelength
was 1.033 Å, and the experimental setup included a 3 m sample-to-detector
length camera and another 0.3 m sample-to-detector length camera with
the high-sensitivity CCD detector. A quartz capillary flow cell of
1.5 mm diameter was fitted to a brass block; this sample holder was
maintained at 25 °C in all experiments. A Microlab 500 Hamilton
pump was used to load samples into the flow cell at a constant rate
(10 mL/s) during X-ray exposure to minimize radiation damage. A single
exposure of 1 s was used to acquire the scattering data, 15 curves
were collected for each sample, and their averaged curves were utilized
for further analysis. Identical measurement configurations were used
for solvent backgrounds and sample solutions for proper background
subtraction.
Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data Analysis
The total
scattering intensity, I(Q), for
a monodisperse protein can be expressed as[22]where np is the
number density of colloidal particles per unit volume in the solution, v is the specific volume of protein that can be predicted
through the empirical equation proposed by Fischer et al.,[23]Q = (4π/λ) sin(θ/2)
is the scattering vector, where λ is the wavelength of the X-ray
beam, θ is the scattering angle, and Δρ is the contrast
of electron densities between proteins and solvent, P(Q) is the form factor of a given protein that reflects
the shape of individual protein, and S(Q) is the structure factor that probes the structure of proteins in
the solution. For an ellipsoidal particle with a parallel radius a and a perpendicular radius b of the equivalent
ellipsoid of protein, the form factor can be expressed as[24,25]The protein aggregation
and protein–protein
interaction upon concentration increase in solutions can be described
by using the effective structure factor S(Q,C):[26]Here I(Q,C) is the scattering
intensity profile from a protein
solution with concentration C, and C0 corresponds to dilute solution in which protein aggregation
is negligible.Guinier analysis and pair distribution function
(PDF) were used
to obtain the radius of gyration Rg, cross-section
radius of gyration (Rc), and size distribution,
respectively. The Guinier approximation was given bywhere α
= 0 for a solid sphere, α
= 1 for a rod-like object, and α = 2 for a sheet-like object.
When the classic Guinier fit (α = 0) was performed, A was equal to I(0), the scattering intensity
at Q = 0, and Rg equaled Rα. When rod-like Guinier fit was performed, Rc was equivalent to √2Rα. When sheet-like Guinier fit was performed, T, the thickness, was equivalent to (12)1/2Rα.GNOM package was used to generate
the PDF P(r), which displayed the
probability of finding one point
within the particle dimension Dm at a
distance r from a given point.[27] The low-resolution structures (2–3 nm–1) of kafirin in aqueous medium were restored by using the algorithm
DAMMIN.[28,29] The program DAMMIN produced the model as
an ensemble of densely packed beads inside a spherical search volume
with a diameter Dmax. The simulated annealing
was utilized to find a compact conformation that had a minimum discrepancy
between the experimental and calculated scattering curves. For each
model body, five independent DAMMIN restorations were performed. Then,
the program DAMAVER was used to generate the averaged model that represented
the common features of all restorations at low resolution.
Atomic
Force Microscopy (AFM)
Tapping mode AFM images
were collected with a NanoScope IIIA Multimode AFM (Veeco Instruments
Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) equipped with a silicon-etched RTESP7
cantilever (Veeco Nanoprobe, Camarillo, CA, USA). A silicon tip with
nominal spring constant of 40 N/m was used. Before tip engagement,
the drive frequency of the silicon tip was tuned to a frequency range
of 300–320 kHz. Kafirin solutions (0.2 mL, dissolved in 60%
butanol) with different initial concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5
mg/mL were dripped onto a freshly cleaved mica surface; after 30 min
of absorption, samples were dried under a stream of nitrogen gas.
All of the collected images were flattened before further analysis.
Section and bearing analyses, which were incorporated in the Nanoscope
5.30 software, were utilized to obtain the quantitative information
of kafirin protein self-assembly morphology.
Results and Discussion
Kafirin
Composition
Kafirin and zein showed typical
electrophoretic patterns as described by previous researchers[30,31] (Figure 1a). Under reducing conditions, kafirin
showed major bands with Mr of 23.8 and
25.1 kDa, indicating the presence of α1-, α2-kafirin polypeptides.
Bands at 19.8 and 27.9 kDa were identified as β- and γ-kafirin
polypeptides. In addition, one light band was found at 54.2 kDa, suggesting
the presence of stable dimers. A few faint bands of higher molecular
weight were also present, indicating soluble oligomers. As a comparison,
commercial zein showed predominately α1- and α2-zein bands
at Mw of 22.1 and 25.4 kDa.
Figure 1
(a) Electrophoretic
pattern of kafirin and zein under reducing
conditions. Lanes: 1, protein marker; 2, kafirin under reducing condition;
3, commercial zein under reducing condition. (b) Plot fit curves for
protein standard (upper) and kafirin (lower) under reducing conditions.
(a) Electrophoretic
pattern of kafirin and zein under reducing
conditions. Lanes: 1, protein marker; 2, kafirin under reducing condition;
3, commercial zein under reducing condition. (b) Plot fit curves for
protein standard (upper) and kafirin (lower) under reducing conditions.According to the calculated peak
areas from the gel run under reducing
conditions (Figure 1b), α-, β-,
and γ-fractions and cross-linked kafirin (dimer and oligomers)
account for 68, 14, 6, and 12% of the total detected kafirin, respectively.
As a percent of total monomers this is equivalent to 77, 16, and 7%
of α-, β-, and γ-fractions, respectively. Previous
studies indicated that α-kafirin comprised 80–84%, whereas
β- and γ-kafirin constituted 7–8 and 9–12%
of the total monomers, respectively.[32−34] The main differences
in the results, namely, decreased proportion in α- and γ-kafirin
fractions and increased presence of β-kafirin, may have been
due to the higher extraction yield of oligomers, which were composed
of γ- and α- kafirins linked together by disulfide bonds.[35] Because γ- and β-kafirins and protein
oligomers encapsulated α-kafirin in a disulfide-bound polymeric
network in the protein body,[36] the ultrasound
treatment with intense agitation and friction forces may effectively
disrupt the cross-linked matrix, leading to a higher dissolution yield
of cross-linked kafirin and soluble oligomers.[37]Amino acid compositions of the extracted kafirin
protein together
with previously reported results of kafirin obtained by similar extraction
procedures[38,39] are presented in Table 1. Paired two-tail t tests showed p values of 0.88 and 0.78 compared with Jones’s and
Jambunathan’s papers, respectively, indicating our sample has
no significant difference with those reported samples. The uncharged
or nonpolar neutral amino acids, namely, glycine, alanine, valine,
methionine, leucine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, proline, and isoleucine,
made up 60.1% of the total amino acids, which contributed to the highly
hydrophobic nature of prolamin. Glutamic acid, leucine, alanine, and
proline were the most abundant amino acids, accounting for about 28.2,
17.5, 11.8, and 10.2%, respectively, of the total amino acids. The
protein contained low levels of lysine, glycine, and histidine. Although
most of the amino acid contents of our extracted kafirin were consistent
with previous results, the contents of methionine and cysteine were
found to be much higher than their counterparts. These differences
may be related to the higher fractions of β- and γ- kafirins
and their disulfide cross-linked oligomers, all containing rich amounts
of cysteine and methionine.[40,41] Therefore, this peculiar
property could render a greater propensity to form intermolecular
disulfide cross-linking and possibly additional protein aggregates.[42]
Table 1
Amino Acid Composition
(g/100 g Protein)
of Kafirin
amino acid
Ia
IIb
IIIc
aspartic
6.0
6.5
7.3
threonine
2.9
2.6
2.8
serine
4.3
4.1
3.9
glutamic acid
28.2
30.0
30.5
glycine
1.4
1.1
1.2
alanine
11.8
12.4
12.5
half-cysteine
3.2
0.4
0.7
valine
3.8
5.0
5.1
methionine
2.1
1.0
1.1
leucine
17.5
19.2
18.8
tyrosine
3.6
5.5
5.3
phenylalanine
6.6
6.4
4.6
lysine
0.1
0.1
0.3
proline
10.2
10.0
10.1
histidine
1.6
0.9
1.3
arginine
3.8
1.0
2
isoleucine
3.0
4.8
4.2
Analysis results reported by work
of our laboratory.
Analysis
results reported by work
of R. W. Jones
Analysis
results reported by work
of R. Jambunathan.
Analysis results reported by work
of our laboratory.Analysis
results reported by work
of R. W. JonesAnalysis
results reported by work
of R. Jambunathan.
Secondary Structure
of Kafirin
Because changes in secondary
structure affect the properties of kafirin, such as surface hydrophobicity
and film-forming properties,[43] the FTIR
spectrum of kafirin in solid state (Figure 2a) was collected and analyzed. Typical amide I and amide II absorption
peaks appeared at 1653 and 1541 cm–1, respectively.
Stretching vibrations of the C=O bond of the amide together
with the weakly coupled in-plane N–H bending and C–N
stretching contribute to the amide I absorption.[44] Because both C=O and N—H bonds were involved
in the hydrogen bonding between different elements contributing to
secondary structure, amide I bond was an ideal wavenumber range for
secondary structure analysis of protein. Previous studies have systematically
correlated proteins of known secondary structure with the shape of
the amide I band, and the following secondary structure in this band
has been suggested:[45,46] β-turn, 1678–1682
cm–1; α-helix, 1648–1659 cm–1; random coil, 1638–1640 cm–1; and β-sheet,
1625–1635 cm–1. Figure 2b shows the second-derivative plot of the amide I peak of kafirin.
Four major components of kafirin were identified in the amide I region
at 1681, 1658, 1644, and 1627 cm–1, respectively.
The most prominent bands at 1658 and 1644 cm–1 originated
from α-helical structures, followed by those in the 1681 and
1627 cm–1 regions, which correspond to β-turn
and β-sheets, respectively. Figure 2c
shows the multiple peak fitting at the four wavelengths using Gaussian
function. By calculation of the individual component peak areas, the
composition of kafirin secondary structure was determined as 49% α-helix,
27% β-turn, and 24% β-sheet, respectively.
Figure 2
(a) FTIR spectrum of
kafirin; (b) second-derivative FTIR spectrum
of amide I and II bands of kafirin; (c) best fit for the FTIR spectrum
using Gaussian multiple peaking fitting analysis for the peaks associated
with protein secondary structure.
(a) FTIR spectrum of
kafirin; (b) second-derivative FTIR spectrum
of amide I and II bands of kafirin; (c) best fit for the FTIR spectrum
using Gaussian multiple peaking fitting analysis for the peaks associated
with protein secondary structure.The secondary structure contents of kafirin in liquid solutions
with different polarities were then determined via far-UV CD spectra.
The CD profiles of kafirin in 60% tert-butanol, 65%
isopropanol, and 85% ethanol are shown in Figure 3. In all cases, the CD spectra of kafirin exhibited the characteristics
of α-helix with two strong negative ellipticity values at 208
and 222 nm. CD ellipticity at 222 nm has been widely used to estimate
α-helix content in proteins.[47] The
CD profiles of kafirin in different solvents show that the unshifted
band at 222 nm has noticeable changes in the ellipticity. Consensus
values of the relative α-helix content in 65% isopropanol, 60% tert-butanol, and 85% ethanol are 53.1, 57.9, and 68.4%,
respectively. The change in α-helix content suggested that kafirin
underwent solvent-induced conformational transformations as a combination
result of differences in polarity index and proton-accepting ability
of different solvents. Dielectric constants of these solvents were
then calculated as 40.0, 39.5, and 32.7 by linear combination of dielectric
constants of organic solvents and water (dielectric constants of tert-butanol, isopropanol, ethanol, and water are 12.4,
18.3, 24.3, and 80.1, respectively, under ambient condition). Because
the polarity of a solvent is proportional to the value of the dielectric
constant, it can be seen that the α-helix content increases
as solvent polarity decreases. Furthermore, the α-helix content
is in agreement with early study that reported the α-helix content
of native kafirin to be 50–60%.[42] Compared with the value measured in dry state, the α-helix
contents were higher in solutions. This result may be either due to
the difference in sensitivities to α-helix structures under
different analyzing techniques or further evidence of the solvent
polarity induced conformational changes. Dry powder form is the extreme
circumstance of polarity changes: the tert-butanol
evaporated before water during the lyophilization process, causing
kafirn to undergo a media change from a highly hydrophobic to a highly
hydrophilic environment. Because water is more polar than tert-butanol, it, again, suggested that increasing the polarity
of kafirin surrounding media could decrease the α-helix content.
In-depth understanding of changes in the secondary structure of kafirin
with processing conditions can help develop new methodologies to optimize
properties of kafirin-based materials.
Figure 3
Far-UV CD spectra
of kafirin in 60% tert-butanol,
65% isopropanol, and 85% ethanol.
Far-UV CD spectra
of kafirin in 60% tert-butanol,
65% isopropanol, and 85% ethanol.
Structure and Self-Assembly Behavior of Kafirin in Solutions
The shape and size of kafirin in different solvents were extracted
on the basis of the SAXS data via form factor fitting, pair distribution
function, and ab initio modeling. Figure 4 presents
the SAXS profiles of 2 mg/mL kafirin in 60% tert-butanol,
65% isopropanol, and 85% ethanol aqueous solutions, respectively.
Among the fittings using solid sphere, cylinder, and ellipsoid models,
the last delivered the best fit, and we only discuss it later. Kafirin
in 60% tert-butanol and 65% isopropanol showed prolate
ellipsoid, with dimensions of 118 × 15 × 15 and 100 ×
11 × 11 Å, respectively (Figure 4a,b). The slightly skewed PDF curve also verified this elongated
conformation with a typical fingerprint of a maximum at small distance,
and the location of the maximum is corresponding to the radius of
the cross-section (insets, below).[26] On
the basis of the PDF curve, ab initio modeling of kafirin showed a
stretched and extended conformation (insets, above). Compared with
60% tert-butanol, kafirin in 65% isopropanol aqueous
solution exhibited a more compact structure with a smoother surface
(insets, above). Different from 60% tert-butanol
and 65% isopropanol, kafirin in 85% ethanol showed a straighter profile
(Figure 4c). Thus, only the power-law relationship
was used to fit the low and intermediate Q regions.
The exponents of −1.4 at low Q region and
−1.1 at intermediate Q region suggested that
either the individual kafirin or its assembly has extended conformation
with a high-order elongated structure.
Figure 4
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) profiles
of 2 mg/mL kafirin
in (a) 60% tert-butanol, (b) 65% isopropanol, and
(c) 85% ethanol. The SAXS data of kafirin in (a) 60% tert-butanol and (b) 65% isopropanol were best fitted with ellipsoidal
form factor. The insets of panels a and b are corresponding pair distribution
function (PDF) curve (below) and ab initio modeling performed by DAMMIN.
Power law was used to fit both the low and intermediate Q regions of (c) kafirin in 85% ethanol.
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) profiles
of 2 mg/mL kafirin
in (a) 60% tert-butanol, (b) 65% isopropanol, and
(c) 85% ethanol. The SAXS data of kafirin in (a) 60% tert-butanol and (b) 65% isopropanol were best fitted with ellipsoidal
form factor. The insets of panels a and b are corresponding pair distribution
function (PDF) curve (below) and ab initio modeling performed by DAMMIN.
Power law was used to fit both the low and intermediate Q regions of (c) kafirin in 85% ethanol.Figure 5 shows the scattering profile
of
kafirin in 60% tert-butanol at concentrations of
2, 5, 10, and 15 mg/mL, respectively. On the basis of Guinier plots
of globular and rod-like particles (Supporting
Information, Figures S1 and S2), the radius of gyration (Rg) and cross-section radius of gyration (Rc) of kafirin in 60% tert-butanol
were extracted and plotted against kafirin concentration in Figure 6a. As protein concentration increased from 2 to
5 mg/mL, Rg increased from 46 to 50 Å
and Rc slightly decreased from 9.4 to
8.8 Å. Further increase of kafirin concentration to 15 mg/mL
resulted in Rg increase to 60.3 Å,
and Rc slightly decreased to 5.8 Å,
respectively. The increase of Rg and decrease
of Rc resulted in a dramatic increase
of axial ratio [calculated by 4/3(Rg/Rc)3] from 155.2 to 1498.3 upon protein
concentration increasing from 2 to 15 mg/mL, which clearly indicated
the aggregation of kafirin at high concentration with an elongated
format.
Figure 5
SAXS profiles of kafirin in aqueous 60% tert-butanol
at different concentrations.
Figure 6
(a) Radius of gyration (Rg) and cross-section
radius of gyration (Rc) of kafirin in
60% tert-butanol; (b) effective structure factor
of 5–15 mg/mL kafirin in 60% tert-butanol.
SAXS profiles of kafirin in aqueous 60% tert-butanol
at different concentrations.(a) Radius of gyration (Rg) and cross-section
radius of gyration (Rc) of kafirin in
60% tert-butanol; (b) effective structure factor
of 5–15 mg/mL kafirin in 60% tert-butanol.The aggregation behavior of kafirin
in 60% tert-butanol upon concentration increase was
further analyzed via effective
structure factor. The effective structure factors S(Q,C) of kafirin in 60% tert-butanol, calculated on the basis of eq 3, are shown in Figure 6b by taking
the scattering intensity profile at C0 = 2 mg/mL as dilute condition. The values of S(Q,C) in the entire Q region
were >1, suggesting an aggregation of kafirin in a given correlation
length range. An inverted peak was found at low Q region, which reciprocally corresponded to correlation length (d = 2π/Q*, the average separation
of proteins). When kafirin concentration increased from 5 to 10 mg/mL,
the correlation length was kept at 249 Å. However, further increase
of kafirin concentration to 15 mg/mL resulted in a decrease of correlation
length to 213 Å due to the concentration-dependent aggregation
of kafirin. It is unlike concentration-independent correlation length
of zein in aqueous ethanol solution,[48] but
similar to the case of zein in acetic acid,[49] which indicates this solvent is good enough to fully dissolve karfirin.
Morphology and Solvent Evaporation Induced Self-Assembly of
Kafirin
AFM is an effective tool to capture the morphology
and self-assembly of either individual proteins or their aggregates.
Figure 7 exhibits the height and 3D images
of kafirin casting from 60% tert-butanol solution
with different initial protein concentrations. During solvent evaporation,
kafirin concentration in solution increased dramatically, and the
remaining solvent became increasingly hydrophilic due to the lower
boiling temperature of tert-butanol. Protein particles
were expected as results of the intramolecular contact of individual
proteins, and butanol evaporation triggered hydrophobic protein–protein
interactions.
Figure 7
Morphology of kafirin on mica using tapping mode–atomic
force microscopy (AFM) height images with casting solutions of 0.1
mg/mL (a), 0.2 mg/mL (b) and 0.5 mg/mL (c) and their corresponding
3D images in panels d, e, and f. The scale size is 2 μm ×
2 μm, and the z scales for each concentration
are 10, 20, and 80 nm, respectively.
Morphology of kafirin on mica using tapping mode–atomic
force microscopy (AFM) height images with casting solutions of 0.1
mg/mL (a), 0.2 mg/mL (b) and 0.5 mg/mL (c) and their corresponding
3D images in panels d, e, and f. The scale size is 2 μm ×
2 μm, and the z scales for each concentration
are 10, 20, and 80 nm, respectively.It was observed that kafirin dispersed well in forms of either
ellipsoidal or disk-like particles at initial protein concentrations
of 0.1 mg/mL, as shown in Figure 7a,d. On the
basis of section analysis and statistical bearing analysis, most of
individual proteins self-assembled into uniform particles with vertical
size between 12 and 17 nm and horizontal size between 20 and 40 nm.
Further dilution did not change the particle size (data not shown),
which indicated that kafirin presented a rather stable aggregation
state when prepared from dilute alcohol solution. This finding is
analogous to the observation reported by Yamada et al (50) in the case of zein. The uniformly distributed
protein aggregates had also been reported by McMaster et al.[51] using AFM. When the initial protein concentration
was increased to 0.2 mg/mL, apart from the presence of individual
spherical particles, large disk-like and rod-like particles began
to emerge as shown in Figure 7b,e. Under section
analysis, a typical disk-like particle had the three axis lengths
of 115 nm (x-axis), 106 nm (y-axis),
13 nm (z-axis), and a typical rod-like particle had
three axis lengths of 246 nm (x-axis), 86 nm (y-axis), 12 nm (z-axis), respectively.
Significant protein aggregation continued, and even larger disk or
rod-like structures were formed when the initial protein concentration
was further increased to 0.5 mg/mL, as shown in Figure 7c,f. Additionally, the standard deviation for particle size
was much larger at 0.5 mg/mL than at 0.2 mg/mL, indicating a more
heterogeneous distribution of kafirin aggregates. Combining the results
of both SAXS and AFM, the observed morphology of kafirin in dry state
may be explained as individual protein with quite prolate dimension
in the dilute solution aggregated into stable ellipsoid particles
as the concentration increased and the hydrophobicity of the solvent
decreased during the solvent evaporation process. As the initial protein
concentration continued to increase, chances for individual prolate
protein to interact with neighboring proteins enhanced, and small
aggregates grew into disk or rod-like aggregates in a larger scale.Key parameters affecting kafirin structure based on our investigations
included the chemical compositions, solvent polarity, protein concentration,
and solvent-induced evaporation process. Results gained in this work
are relevant in guiding the development of kafirin-based biomaterials.
The high propensity of protein aggregation due to the higher proportion
of β- and γ-fractions and cross-linked kafirin is the
basis for understanding its physical nature and rheological property
in solution state. Clarification of the conformational changes of
kafirin protein along with changes in protein concentration and solvent
polarity is vital for designing the sample preparation and formulation
process for kafirin-based biomaterials. The self-assembly behavior
of kafirin under solvent-induced evaporation process lays the foundation
for the understanding of its film-forming properties and the preparation
of kafirin-based fibrillar materials.
Authors: Umar Shah; Deepak Dwivedi; Mark Hackett; Hani Al-Salami; Ranjeet P Utikar; Chris Blanchard; Adil Gani; Matthew R Rowles; Stuart K Johnson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Raquel A Ortíz Cruz; José L Cárdenas López; Gustavo A González Aguilar; Humberto Astiazarán García; Shela Gorinstein; Rafael Canett Romero; Maribel Robles Sánchez Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 3.411