Literature DB >> 2550719

Relative contributions of chemical exchange and other relaxation mechanisms in protein solutions and tissues.

J H Zhong1, J C Gore, I M Armitage.   

Abstract

Transverse relaxation times T2 of water protons were measured in 5% protein solutions and soaked rat liver in different static magnetic fields (0.15 to 11 T). Protein molecular weight varied between 1.4 and 480 kDa in solutions of varying degrees of deuteration. The data obtained are analyzed in terms of a model system consisting of three phases of different relaxation characteristics: protein protons, hydration layer water protons, and bulk water protons. The contributions to relaxation due to hydrodynamic effects on water protons, cross relaxation between the hydration layer water protons and the protein protons, and chemical exchange between the hydration layer water protons and the bulk water protons are separately estimated. The experimental results indicate that the "hydrodynamic interactions" are about the same magnitude in rat liver and all the proteins studied, but the contribution of the cross relaxation differs by several orders in different protein systems. Fast chemical exchange between the hydration layer water and the bulk water causes considerable shortening of T2 at high magnetic fields for all the protein solutions and rat tissue studied. Selected samples were studied at different temperatures (213-318 K) and with different intervals in the CPMG sequence. The rates of chemical exchange and fractional populations of different phases are determined, and the results obtained provide support for the model in which fast exchange among the different water phases is an important feature of the overall relaxation behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2550719     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910110304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  17 in total

1.  Studies of the T1 and T2 of intracellular water as a function of frequency in normal and transformed fetal cells.

Authors:  D E Callahan; T L Trapane; S F Deamond; G Kao; P O Ts'o; L S Kan
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1991-06

2.  Multishot PROPELLER for high-field preclinical MRI.

Authors:  Prachi Pandit; Yi Qi; Jennifer Story; Kevin F King; G Allan Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Quantitative theory for the transverse relaxation time of blood water.

Authors:  Wenbo Li; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 4.  Characterizing micro-to-millisecond chemical exchange in nucleic acids using off-resonance R relaxation dispersion.

Authors:  Atul Rangadurai; Eric S Szymaski; Isaac J Kimsey; Honglue Shi; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 9.795

5.  Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging of rodent glioma using selective inversion recovery.

Authors:  Junzhong Xu; Ke Li; Zhongliang Zu; Xia Li; Daniel F Gochberg; John C Gore
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Transverse water relaxation in whole blood and erythrocytes at 3T, 7T, 9.4T, 11.7T and 16.4T; determination of intracellular hemoglobin and extracellular albumin relaxivities.

Authors:  Ksenija Grgac; Wenbo Li; Alan Huang; Qin Qin; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Measurement of regional cerebral glucose uptake by magnetic resonance spin-lock imaging.

Authors:  Zhongliang Zu; John Spear; Hua Li; Junzhong Xu; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Transforming thymidine into a magnetic resonance imaging probe for monitoring gene expression.

Authors:  Amnon Bar-Shir; Guanshu Liu; Yajie Liang; Nirbhay N Yadav; Michael T McMahon; Piotr Walczak; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Martin G Pomper; Keri A Tallman; Marc M Greenberg; Peter C M van Zijl; Jeff W M Bulte; Assaf A Gilad
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Comparison of SNR and CNR for in vivo mouse brain imaging at 3 and 7 T using well matched scanner configurations.

Authors:  M W DiFrancesco; J M Rasmussen; W Yuan; R Pratt; S Dunn; B J Dardzinski; S K Holland
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  On the origins of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast in tumors at 9.4 T.

Authors:  Junzhong Xu; Moritz Zaiss; Zhongliang Zu; Hua Li; Jingping Xie; Daniel F Gochberg; Peter Bachert; John C Gore
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.