Kerrie Ann Clover1,2,3, Alex J Mitchell4, Ben Britton1,2, Gregory Carter2,5. 1. Psycho-Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Priority Research Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. 3. School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Department of Psycho-oncology, University of Leicester and Leicestershire Partnership Trust, Leicestershire, UK. 5. Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Many patients who experience distress do not seek help, and little is known about the reasons for this. We explored the reasons for declining help among patients who had significant emotional distress. METHODS: Data were collected through QUICATOUCH screening at an Australian hospital. Oncology outpatients scoring 4 or more on the Distress Thermometer were asked if they would 'like help' with their distress. Those who declined help were asked their reasons. Demographic variables and a clinical measure of anxiety and depression (PSYCH-6) were used to identify factors associated with reasons for declining help. RESULTS: Of 311 patients with significant distress, 221 (71%) declined help. The most common reasons were 'I prefer to manage myself' (n = 99, 46%); 'already receiving help' (n = 52, 24%) and 'my distress is not severe enough' (n = 50, 23%). Younger patients and women were more likely to decline help and were more likely to already be receiving help. Distress score and PSYCH-6 scores were significantly lower among patients who rated their distress as not severe enough to require help. Nevertheless, there were patients who had maximal scores on distress and PSYCH in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Two common patient barriers to help with distress are a preference for self-help and a belief that distress is not sufficiently severe to warrant intervention. These beliefs were held by a sizeable proportion of individuals who reported very high levels of distress. Qualitative research and subsequent interventions for overcoming these barriers are required to obtain the most benefit from distress screening programs.
OBJECTIVE: Many patients who experience distress do not seek help, and little is known about the reasons for this. We explored the reasons for declining help among patients who had significant emotional distress. METHODS: Data were collected through QUICATOUCH screening at an Australian hospital. Oncology outpatients scoring 4 or more on the Distress Thermometer were asked if they would 'like help' with their distress. Those who declined help were asked their reasons. Demographic variables and a clinical measure of anxiety and depression (PSYCH-6) were used to identify factors associated with reasons for declining help. RESULTS: Of 311 patients with significant distress, 221 (71%) declined help. The most common reasons were 'I prefer to manage myself' (n = 99, 46%); 'already receiving help' (n = 52, 24%) and 'my distress is not severe enough' (n = 50, 23%). Younger patients and women were more likely to decline help and were more likely to already be receiving help. Distress score and PSYCH-6 scores were significantly lower among patients who rated their distress as not severe enough to require help. Nevertheless, there were patients who had maximal scores on distress and PSYCH in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Two common patient barriers to help with distress are a preference for self-help and a belief that distress is not sufficiently severe to warrant intervention. These beliefs were held by a sizeable proportion of individuals who reported very high levels of distress. Qualitative research and subsequent interventions for overcoming these barriers are required to obtain the most benefit from distress screening programs.
Authors: Emma Kemp; Bogda Koczwara; Phyllis Butow; Jane Turner; Afaf Girgis; Penelope Schofield; Nicholas Hulbert-Williams; Janelle Levesque; Danielle Spence; Sina Vatandoust; Ganessan Kichenadasse; Amitesh Roy; Shawgi Sukumaran; Christos S Karapetis; Caroline Richards; Michael Fitzgerald; Lisa Beatty Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Anouk S Schuit; Karen Holtmaat; Valesca van Zwieten; Eline J Aukema; Lotte Gransier; Pim Cuijpers; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-04-22
Authors: Anne-Marie H Krebber; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; Heleen C Melissant; Pim Cuijpers; Annemieke van Straten; Annemarie Becker-Commissaris; C René Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Johanna Ringwald; Lennart Marwedel; Florian Junne; Katrin Ziser; Norbert Schäffeler; Lena Gerstner; Markus Wallwiener; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Martin Hautzinger; Stephan Zipfel; Martin Teufel Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2017-11-24