Literature DB >> 26864761

Associative plasticity in the human motor cortex is enhanced by concurrently targeting separate muscle representations with excitatory and inhibitory protocols.

Marc R Kamke1, Abbey S Nydam2, Martin V Sale2, Jason B Mattingley3.   

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) induces changes in the excitability of human sensorimotor cortex that outlast the procedure. PAS typically involves repeatedly pairing stimulation of a peripheral nerve that innervates an intrinsic hand muscle with transcranial magnetic stimulation over the representation of that muscle in the primary motor cortex. Depending on the timing of the stimuli (interstimulus interval of 25 or 10 ms), PAS leads to either an increase (PAS25) or a decrease (PAS10) in excitability. Both protocols, however, have been associated with an increase in excitability of nearby muscle representations not specifically targeted by PAS. Based on these spillover effects, we hypothesized that an additive, excitability-enhancing effect of PAS25 applied to one muscle representation may be produced by simultaneously applying PAS25 or PAS10 to a nearby representation. In different experiments prototypical PAS25 targeting the left thumb representation [abductor pollicis brevis (APB)] was combined with either PAS25 or PAS10 applied to the left little finger representation [abductor digiti minimi (ADM)] or, in a control experiment, with PAS10 also targeting the APB. In an additional control experiment PAS10 targeted both representations. The plasticity effects were quantified by measuring the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded before and after PAS. As expected, prototypical PAS25 was associated with an increase in MEP amplitude in the APB muscle. This effect was enhanced when PAS also targeted the ADM representation but only when a different interstimulus timing (PAS10) was used. These results suggest that PAS-induced plasticity is modified by concurrently targeting separate motor cortical representations with excitatory and inhibitory protocols.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor cortex; motor evoked potential; paired associative stimulation; plasticity; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26864761      PMCID: PMC4869502          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00794.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Visual attentional load influences plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Michelle G Hall; Hayley F Lye; Martin V Sale; Laura R Fenlon; Timothy J Carroll; Stephan Riek; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation: reproducibility of effects and intraindividual reliability.

Authors:  Fabiana Fratello; Domenica Veniero; Giuseppe Curcio; Michele Ferrara; Cristina Marzano; Fabio Moroni; Maria Concetta Pellicciari; Mario Bertini; Paolo Maria Rossini; Luigi De Gennaro
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Differences between the effects of three plasticity inducing protocols on the organization of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: experimental framework and human models.

Authors:  Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms.

Authors:  Virginia López-Alonso; Binith Cheeran; Dan Río-Rodríguez; Miguel Fernández-Del-Olmo
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Associative plasticity in surround inhibition circuits in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Daniele Belvisi; Panagiotis Kassavetis; Matteo Bologna; Mark J Edwards; Alfredo Berardelli; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  The two sides of associative plasticity in writer's cramp.

Authors:  David Weise; Axel Schramm; Katja Stefan; Alexander Wolters; Karlheinz Reiners; Markus Naumann; Joseph Classen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Wolters; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Antje Schlottmann; Erwin Kunesch; Katja Stefan; Leonardo G Cohen; Reiner Benecke; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Abnormal associative plasticity of the human motor cortex in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Angelo Quartarone; Sergio Bagnato; Vincenzo Rizzo; Hartwig R Siebner; Vincenzo Dattola; Antonio Scalfari; Francesca Morgante; Fortunato Battaglia; Marcello Romano; Paolo Girlanda
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS.

Authors:  Binith Cheeran; Penelope Talelli; Francesco Mori; Giacomo Koch; Antonio Suppa; Mark Edwards; Henry Houlden; Kailash Bhatia; Richard Greenwood; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  2 in total

1.  Lower body blood flow restriction training may induce remote muscle strength adaptations in an active unrestricted arm.

Authors:  Anthony K May; Aaron P Russell; Stuart A Warmington
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Does sonification of action simulation training impact corticospinal excitability and audiomotor plasticity?

Authors:  Fabio Castro; Ladan Osman; Giovanni Di Pino; Aleksandra Vuckovic; Alexander Nowicky; Daniel Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.