| Literature DB >> 25503103 |
Medhavi Sudarshan1, Toolika Singh1, Abhishek Kumar Singh1, Ankita Chourasia1, Bhawana Singh1, Mary E Wilson2, Jaya Chakravarty1, Shyam Sundar1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Studies employing serological, DTH or conventional PCR techniques suggest a vast proportion of Leishmania infected individuals living in regions endemic for Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) remain asymptomatic. This study was designed to assess whether quantitative PCR (qPCR) can be used for detection of asymptomatic or early Leishmania donovani infection and as a predictor of progression to symptomatic disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25503103 PMCID: PMC4263468 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Taqman primers and probe for detection of Leishmania DNA in endemic healthy controls.
| Primers | Probe | |
| kDNA4 forward |
|
|
| kDNA4 reverse |
|
Sequences correspond to the kDNA4 minicircle DNA primers and probe [21].
Figure 1Flow chart of study of serology in endemic healthy control individuals (EHC) from baseline serosurvey (year 1) to identification of progressors.
SP – seropositive; SN – seronegative; QP – qPCR positive (CT cutoff 39); QN – qPCR negative; VL – progressors to symptomatic visceral leishmaniasis.
Figure 2Bar graph to show Leishmania detected by qPCR in different group of EHC on the basis of their serological status (QP-qPCR positive, QN-qPCR negative, SP-sero positive, SN-sero negative).
Parasitemia range in blood buffy coat samples from healthy controls from endemic or nonendemic regions.
| Range of parasite genome equivalents in blood cells from individuals with non-zero results of parasite qPCR test | ||||||||
| positive | negative | >0–<1 | 1–5 | 5–10 | 11–100 | 101–1000 | >1000 | |
|
| 171 (42.6%) | 230 | 149 ( | 16 ( | 2 (1 | 1 ( | 3 ( | 0 |
|
| 340 (31.8%) | 728 (2 | 306 ( | 24 | 5 (1 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
|
| zero | all | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(*converted into VL).
Pogressors (disease conversion, VL cases) details: Parasite load and serostatus of EHC who were healthy at the first survey, but developed symptomatic VL at the time of the 12-month follow up.
| S.No. | disease conversion time (after blood collection) | qPCR (genome equivalents/mlof blood) | Sero statuspos/neg |
| 1 | after one month | 10.5 | Pos |
| 2 | with in one month | 6.6 | Pos |
| 3 | after five months | 97 | Pos |
| 4 | after six months | 0.38 | Pos |
| 5 | with in one month | 754.73 | Pos |
| 6 | with in one month | 146.32 | Pos |
| 7 | after three months | 5.09 | Neg |
| 8 | after three months | 0.613 | Neg |
| 9 | after five months | 0 | Neg |
| 10 | after two months | 0 | Neg |
(pos - positive on either serologic test; neg – negative on both serologic tests).