Literature DB >> 25502854

Coping with congenital hand differences.

Lauren E Franzblau1, Kevin C Chung, Noelle Carlozzi, Autumn Y T Chin, Kate W Nellans, Jennifer F Waljee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although functional outcomes following reconstruction for congenital hand differences are frequently described, much less is known regarding children's ability to cope with the psychosocial effects of these conditions. The authors qualitatively explored stress and coping mechanisms among children following reconstructive surgery for congenital hand differences.
METHODS: Forty patients and their parents participated in semistructured interviews examining children's stress related to hand functioning and appearance, emotional responses to stress, and coping strategies. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding by two reviewers. Themes expressed by participants were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories.
RESULTS: In this sample, 58 percent of children and 40 percent of parents reported stress related to congenital hand differences, attributed to functional deficits (61 percent), hand appearance (27 percent), social interactions (58 percent), and emotional reactions (46 percent). Among the 18 children who reported stress, 43 percent of parents were not aware of the presence of stress. Eight coping strategies emerged, including humor (12 percent), self-acceptance (21 percent), avoidance (27 percent), seeking external support (30 percent), concealment (30 percent), educating others (9 percent), support programs (21 percent), and religion (24 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Although children with congenital hand differences often experience emotional stress related to functional limitations and aesthetic deformities, many apply positive coping mechanisms that enhance self-esteem. Clinicians caring for children with congenital hand differences should inform families about potential sources of stress to direct resources toward strengthening coping strategies and support systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25502854      PMCID: PMC4425308          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  26 in total

1.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  M K Giacomini; D J Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Psychological stress and disease.

Authors:  Sheldon Cohen; Denise Janicki-Deverts; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?

Authors:  I T Coyne
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Psychological adjustment and perceived social support in children with congenital/acquired limb deficiencies.

Authors:  J W Varni; Y Setoguchi; L R Rappaport; D Talbot
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1992-02

5.  Determinants of self-esteem in children with congenital/acquired limb deficiencies.

Authors:  J W Varni; L A Rubenfeld; D Talbot; Y Setoguchi
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.225

6.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Cognitive behavioral therapy for 4- to 7-year-old children with anxiety disorders: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Dina R Hirshfeld-Becker; Bruce Masek; Aude Henin; Lauren Raezer Blakely; Rachel A Pollock-Wurman; Julia McQuade; Lillian DePetrillo; Jacquelyn Briesch; Thomas H Ollendick; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Joseph Biederman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2010-08

8.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  M K Giacomini; D J Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Self-concept of early primary school age children with visible or invisible defects.

Authors:  H Broder; R P Strauss
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1989-04

10.  Social life aspects of young adults with cleft lip and palate: grounded theory approach.

Authors:  Woranuch Chetpakdeechit; Ulrika Hallberg; Catharina Hagberg; Bengt Mohlin
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.331

View more
  4 in total

1.  The importance of embryology for parents of children with congenital hand differences.

Authors:  Andrew D Clelland; Órla Duncan; Wee L Lam
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2021-12-08

Review 2.  Do Patient- and Parent-reported Outcomes Measures for Children With Congenital Hand Differences Capture WHO-ICF Domains?

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Rebecca S Bickham; Kevin C Chung; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Importance of Hand Appearance as a Patient-Reported Outcome in Hand Surgery.

Authors:  Shepard P Johnson; Sandeep J Sebastin; Shady A Rehim; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-12-09

4.  "Will You Still Feel Beautiful When You Find Out You Are Different?": Parents' Experiences, Reflections, and Appearance-Focused Conversations About Their Child's Visible Difference.

Authors:  Kristin J Billaud Feragen; Anita Myhre; Nicola Marie Stock
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2021-10-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.