Literature DB >> 25502332

Significance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake at the Gastroesophageal Junction: Comparison of PET to Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Joshua Stagg1, Irfan Farukhi, Francisco Lazaga, Chiarra Thompson, Ledjona Bradshaw, Mohamed Kaif, Aron Gould-Simon, Robert Schmidt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) occasionally reveals unexpected uptake of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). The aim of this study was to determine the importance of unexpected (18)F-FDG uptake at the GEJ on PET/CT by correlating this finding with endoscopy results.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records from June 2009 to October 2012 to identify patients in our Veterans Affairs Medical Center who had an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed within 6 months of a PET/CT. Metabolic activity at the GEJ was quantified with standardized uptake values (SUV) and correlated with EGD and histopathology results.
RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were identified and assigned to one of five groups based upon EGD findings: esophageal malignancy (n = 34), esophagitis (n = 21), Barrett's esophagus (n = 8), other non-malignant disorders (n = 5), and normal (n = 151). The mean SUV Max for the groups was 6.72, 2.47, 2.40, 3.48, and 2.06, respectively. SUV Max and SUV Mean were significantly higher in the esophageal malignancy group than in all other groups (p < 0.001). SUV for patients with high-grade esophagitis was greater than in patients with low-grade esophagitis. A SUV Max ≥ 3.5 was found to predict necessity for EGD with a positive predictive value of 79 %. A SUV Max ≤ 2.2 yielded a negative predictive value of 86 %.
CONCLUSION: Differentiation between benign and potentially significant disease at the GEJ may be possible with quantification of incidental (18)F-FDG uptake at PET/CT. Our results suggest thresholds that may help determine need for further endoscopic evaluation in patients with abnormal metabolic activity at the GEJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25502332     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3456-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  25 in total

1.  Eosinophilic esophagitis.

Authors:  Richard J Noel; Philip E Putnam; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  False-positive FDG positron emission tomography uptake in nonmalignant chest abnormalities.

Authors:  Syed Asad; Suzanne L Aquino; Nitra Piyavisetpat; Alan J Fischman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy--systematic review.

Authors:  Marinke Westerterp; Henderik L van Westreenen; Johannes B Reitsma; Otto S Hoekstra; Jaap Stoker; Paul Fockens; Pieter L Jager; Berthe L F Van Eck-Smit; John T M Plukker; J Jan B van Lanschot; Gerrit W Sloof
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Prognostic value of the standardized uptake value in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Henderik L van Westreenen; John T M Plukker; David C P Cobben; Carolien J M Verhoogt; Henk Groen; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  V J Lowe; K S Naunheim
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Whole-body positron emission tomography: normal variations, pitfalls, and technical considerations.

Authors:  B A Gordon; F L Flanagan; F Dehdashti
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging evaluation of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Robert W Henderson; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  FDG-PET imaging in HIV infection and tuberculosis.

Authors:  Mike Sathekge; Alex Maes; Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 9.  From tumor biology to clinical Pet: a review of positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology.

Authors:  K Kubota
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 10.  Epidemiology and risk factors for gastroesophageal junction tumors: understanding the rising incidence of this disease.

Authors:  Matthew F Buas; Thomas L Vaughan
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.934

View more
  3 in total

1.  The influence of tumour fluorodeoxyglucose avidity and cachexia development on patient survival in oesophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Authors:  Santiago Olaechea; Bhavani S Gannavarapu; Anne Gilmore; Christian Alvarez; Puneeth Iyengar; Rodney Infante
Journal:  JCSM Clin Rep       Date:  2021-09-05

Review 2.  Evidence-based management of incidental focal uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose on PET-CT.

Authors:  Deborah Pencharz; Malavika Nathan; Thomas L Wagner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Candida esophagitis incidentally detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT in a patient with CNS lymphoma.

Authors:  Melikşah Bayar; Nurgül Özgür Yurttaş; Seçkin Bilgiç; Kebire Karakuş; Uğur Önal; Kerim Sönmezoğlu; Zafer Başlar; Ahmet Emre Eşkazan
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.