Literature DB >> 11831394

From tumor biology to clinical Pet: a review of positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology.

K Kubota1.   

Abstract

Cancer cells show increased metabolism of both glucose and amino acids, which can be monitored with 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG), a glucose analogue, and 11C-L-methionine (Met), respectively. FDG uptake is higher in fast-growing than in slow-growing tumors. FDG uptake is considered to be a good marker of the grade of malignancy. Several studies have indicated that the degree of FDG uptake in primary lung cancer can be used as a prognostic indicator. Differential diagnosis of lung tumors has been studied extensively with both computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET). It has been established that FDG-PET is clinically very useful and that its diagnostic accuracy is higher than that of CT. Detection of lymph node or distant metastases in known cancer patients using a whole-body imaging technique with FDG-PET has become a good indication for PET. FDG uptake may be seen in a variety of tissues due to physiological glucose consumption. Also FDG uptake is not specific for cancer. Various types of active inflammation showed FDG uptake to a certain high level. Understanding of the physiological and benign causes of FDG uptake is important for accurate interpretation of FDG-PET. In monitoring radio/chemotherapy, changes in FDG uptake correlate with the number of viable cancer cells, whereas Met is a marker of proliferation. Reduction of FDG uptake is a sensitive marker of viable tissue, preceding necrotic extension and volumetric shrinkage. FDG-PET is useful for the detection of recurrence and for monitoring the therapeutic response of tumor tissues in various cancers, including those of the lung, colon, and head and neck. Thus, PET, particularly with FDG, is effective in monitoring cancer cell viability, and is clinically very useful for the diagnosis and detection of recurrence of lung and other cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11831394     DOI: 10.1007/bf02988499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  72 in total

1.  The impact of image fusion in resolving discrepant findings between FDG-PET and MRI/CT in patients with gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  Cheng-Chien Tsai; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Koon-Kwan Ng; Chyong-Huey Lai; Swei Hsueh; Pan-Fu Kao; Ting-Chang Chang; Ji-Hong Hong; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Iodine quantification with dual-energy CT: phantom study and preliminary experience with VX2 residual tumour in rabbits after radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Y Li; G Shi; S Wang; S Wang; R Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Computerized PET/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  W Lu; J Wang; H H Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Fluorinated ΔF508-CFTR correctors and potentiators for PET imaging.

Authors:  Holly R Davison; Danielle M Solano; Puay-Wah Phuan; A S Verkman; Mark J Kurth
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Pulmonary suture abscess with false-positive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission scan mimicking lung cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Teruo Iwasaki; Katsuhiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Katsura; Shigeru Nakane; Kunimitsu Kawahara; Haruyuki Fukuda
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-08

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in the follow-up of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  María José García-Velloso; Matías Jurado; Carolina Ceamanos; José Manuel Aramendía; María Puy Garrastachu; Guillermo López-García; José Angel Richter
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Study of an image-derived SUV and a modified SUV using mouse FDG-PET.

Authors:  Xiujuan Zheng; Chin-Lung Yu; Wei Sha; Caius Radu; Sung-Cheng Huang; Dagan Feng
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 8.  Mechanism-Based Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment Response Constrained by Multiparametric Imaging Data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; Matthew T McKenna; David T Fuentes; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-02

9.  Potential impact of [18F]3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine versus [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in positron emission tomography for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D L Francis; D Visvikis; D C Costa; T H A Arulampalam; C Townsend; S K Luthra; I Taylor; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography in the clinical management of cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  Tarun Singhal; Tanjore K Narayanan; Viney Jain; Jogeshwar Mukherjee; Joseph Mantil
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.