Background and Aims: Cancer cachexia is manifested by loss in muscle, adipose, weight, and appetite. PET 18F-FDG uptake identifies tumor metabolic and inflammatory changes, potentially associated with cachexia development. We examined if primary gastroesophageal tumor 18F-FDG uptake correlates with cachexia development and survival in cancer patients. Methods: One hundred twenty-six esophageal (n=87) and gastroesophageal junction (n=39) cancer patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 63 years (IQR 54-71), evaluated between 2006-2014 with pre-treatment PET imaging and cachexia determination at diagnosis were included in the study cohort (22.1% female; 6.7%, 24.4%, 50.4%, and 18.5% with tumor stage I, II, III, and IV respectively). Maximum primary tumor standardized uptake values (SUVMax) were obtained and dichotomized based off the calculated cut-point SUVMax of 8.5 (P=.0018). Associations between survival, cachexia development and primary tumor 18F-FDG uptake were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Cancer-associated weight loss (cachexia) and primary tumor SUVMax at or above the statistically determined cut-point of 8.5 were present in 54% and 57% of patients, respectively. Primary tumor SUVMax above the cut-point was significantly associated with pre-treatment cancer-associated weight loss (P=.0033) and, in multivariate analysis, correlated with a 2.3-fold increased risk of death (95% CI 1.4, 3.7; P=.0010). When divided into cohorts defined by their combined cachexia and high versus low SUVMax tumor status, positive cachexia status or/and high SUVMax tumors were associated with similar significant decrements in survival. Conclusion: A positive association was present between cancer-associated weight loss and SUVMax of the primary tumor, suggesting greater glycolytic metabolism in gastroesophageal tumors that induce cachexia. This interpretation of routinely administered PET scans could lead to earlier categorization of patients with cachexia-inducing tumors. Both cachexia and high SUVMax status were independently associated with worsened survival outcomes, further supporting their prognostic relevance in patients with gastroesophageal cancer.
Background and Aims: Cancer cachexia is manifested by loss in muscle, adipose, weight, and appetite. PET 18F-FDG uptake identifies tumor metabolic and inflammatory changes, potentially associated with cachexia development. We examined if primary gastroesophageal tumor 18F-FDG uptake correlates with cachexia development and survival in cancer patients. Methods: One hundred twenty-six esophageal (n=87) and gastroesophageal junction (n=39) cancer patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 63 years (IQR 54-71), evaluated between 2006-2014 with pre-treatment PET imaging and cachexia determination at diagnosis were included in the study cohort (22.1% female; 6.7%, 24.4%, 50.4%, and 18.5% with tumor stage I, II, III, and IV respectively). Maximum primary tumor standardized uptake values (SUVMax) were obtained and dichotomized based off the calculated cut-point SUVMax of 8.5 (P=.0018). Associations between survival, cachexia development and primary tumor 18F-FDG uptake were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Cancer-associated weight loss (cachexia) and primary tumor SUVMax at or above the statistically determined cut-point of 8.5 were present in 54% and 57% of patients, respectively. Primary tumor SUVMax above the cut-point was significantly associated with pre-treatment cancer-associated weight loss (P=.0033) and, in multivariate analysis, correlated with a 2.3-fold increased risk of death (95% CI 1.4, 3.7; P=.0010). When divided into cohorts defined by their combined cachexia and high versus low SUVMax tumor status, positive cachexia status or/and high SUVMax tumors were associated with similar significant decrements in survival. Conclusion: A positive association was present between cancer-associated weight loss and SUVMax of the primary tumor, suggesting greater glycolytic metabolism in gastroesophageal tumors that induce cachexia. This interpretation of routinely administered PET scans could lead to earlier categorization of patients with cachexia-inducing tumors. Both cachexia and high SUVMax status were independently associated with worsened survival outcomes, further supporting their prognostic relevance in patients with gastroesophageal cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
Appetite; Cachexia; Cancer metabolism; Gastroesophageal cancer; Positron emission tomography; Weight loss
Authors: Bhavani S Gannavarapu; Steven K M Lau; Kristen Carter; Nathan A Cannon; Ang Gao; Chul Ahn; Jeffrey J Meyer; David J Sher; Aminah Jatoi; Rodney Infante; Puneeth Iyengar Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Steven K M Lau; Bhavani S Gannavarapu; Kristen Carter; Ang Gao; Chul Ahn; Jeffrey J Meyer; David J Sher; Aminah Jatoi; Rodney Infante; Puneeth Iyengar Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Shalender Bhasin; Thomas G Travison; Todd M Manini; Sheena Patel; Karol M Pencina; Roger A Fielding; Jay M Magaziner; Anne B Newman; Douglas P Kiel; Cyrus Cooper; Jack M Guralnik; Jane A Cauley; Hidenori Arai; Brian C Clark; Francesco Landi; Laura A Schaap; Suzette L Pereira; Daniel Rooks; Jean Woo; Linda J Woodhouse; Ellen Binder; Todd Brown; Michelle Shardell; Quian-Li Xue; Ralph B DʼAgostino; Denise Orwig; Greg Gorsicki; Rosaly Correa-De-Araujo; Peggy M Cawthon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: William J Evans; John E Morley; Josep Argilés; Connie Bales; Vickie Baracos; Denis Guttridge; Aminah Jatoi; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Herbert Lochs; Giovanni Mantovani; Daniel Marks; William E Mitch; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Armine Najand; Piotr Ponikowski; Filippo Rossi Fanelli; Morrie Schambelan; Annemie Schols; Michael Schuster; David Thomas; Robert Wolfe; Stefan D Anker Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2008-08-21 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Santiago Olaechea; Anne Gilmore; Christian Alvarez; Bhavani S Gannavarapu; Rodney Infante; Puneeth Iyengar Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 5.738