Literature DB >> 25501711

[Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Indications, technique, advantages and disadvantages].

M Richter1, M Weidenfeld, F P Uckmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for lumbar interbody fusion from L2 to the sacrum has been an established technique for decades.
OBJECTIVES: The advantages and disadvantages of ALIF compared to posterior interbody fusion techniques are discussed. The operative technique is described in detail. Complications and avoidance strategies are discussed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This article is based on a selective literature search using PubMed and the experience of the authors in this medical field.
RESULTS: The advantages of ALIF compared to posterior fusion techniques are the free approach to the anterior disc space without opening of the spinal canal or the neural foramina. This gives the possibility of an extensive anterior release and placement of the largest possible cages without the risk of neural structure damage. The disadvantages of ALIF are the additional anterior approach and the related complications. The most frequent complication is due to damage of vessels. The rate of complications is significantly increased in revision surgery.
CONCLUSION: The ALIF technique meaningfully expands the repertoire of the spinal surgeon especially for the treatment of non-union after interbody fusion, in patients with epidural scar tissue at the index level and spinal infections. Advantages and disadvantages should be considered when evaluating the indications for ALIF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25501711     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-3056-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  20 in total

1.  A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  T A Zdeblick; S M David
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Nick Birch; Matthew Shaw
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; Natalie M Best; Praveen V Mummaneni; Thomas M Reilly; Sajjad M Hussain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; Shukor Hashim; Lucas A Wilson; Michael F O'Brien; David A B Smith; Molly J Diekmann; Julie Trommeter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  [Minimally invasive anterior approaches to the lumbosacral junction].

Authors:  Andreas Korge; Christoph Siepe; Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Salvador A Brau; Rick B Delamarter; Michael L Schiffman; Lytton A Williams; Robert G Watkins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management.

Authors:  Gary A Fantini; Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi; Harvinder S Sandhu; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Perioperative complications in revision anterior lumbar spine surgery: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Michael T Casnellie; Joseph H Perra; Ensor E Transfeldt; Manuel R Pinto; Francis Denis; Timothy A Garvey; David W Polly; Amir A Mehbod; Daryll C Dykes; Robert B Winter; Jill M Wroblewski
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Mini-open approach to the spine for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: description of the procedure, results and complications.

Authors:  Salvador A Brau
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  3 in total

1.  [ALIF and PLIF interposition in low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis L5/S1 : Longterm-Comparison of interbody fusion techniques (ALIF - PLIF)].

Authors:  C Fleege; M Arabmotlagh; W Rother; M Rauschmann; M Rickert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Pseudarthrosis in adult spine deformity surgery: risk factors and treatment options.

Authors:  Manuel Fernandes Marques; Vincent Fiere; Ibrahim Obeid; Yann-Philippe Charles; Khaled El-Youssef; Abi Lahoud; Joe Faddoul; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Guillaume Riouallon; Clément Silvestre; Jean-Charles Le Huec; David Kieser; Louis Boissiere
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Zhu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Feng-Dong Zhao; Jian-Feng Zhang; Xing Zhao; Zhi-Jun Hu; Shun-Wu Fan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.