M Richter1, M Weidenfeld, F P Uckmann. 1. Wirbelsäulenzentrum, St.-Josefs Hospital, Beethovenstraße 20, 65189, Wiesbaden, Deutschland, mrichter@joho.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for lumbar interbody fusion from L2 to the sacrum has been an established technique for decades. OBJECTIVES: The advantages and disadvantages of ALIF compared to posterior interbody fusion techniques are discussed. The operative technique is described in detail. Complications and avoidance strategies are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This article is based on a selective literature search using PubMed and the experience of the authors in this medical field. RESULTS: The advantages of ALIF compared to posterior fusion techniques are the free approach to the anterior disc space without opening of the spinal canal or the neural foramina. This gives the possibility of an extensive anterior release and placement of the largest possible cages without the risk of neural structure damage. The disadvantages of ALIF are the additional anterior approach and the related complications. The most frequent complication is due to damage of vessels. The rate of complications is significantly increased in revision surgery. CONCLUSION: The ALIF technique meaningfully expands the repertoire of the spinal surgeon especially for the treatment of non-union after interbody fusion, in patients with epidural scar tissue at the index level and spinal infections. Advantages and disadvantages should be considered when evaluating the indications for ALIF.
BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for lumbar interbody fusion from L2 to the sacrum has been an established technique for decades. OBJECTIVES: The advantages and disadvantages of ALIF compared to posterior interbody fusion techniques are discussed. The operative technique is described in detail. Complications and avoidance strategies are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This article is based on a selective literature search using PubMed and the experience of the authors in this medical field. RESULTS: The advantages of ALIF compared to posterior fusion techniques are the free approach to the anterior disc space without opening of the spinal canal or the neural foramina. This gives the possibility of an extensive anterior release and placement of the largest possible cages without the risk of neural structure damage. The disadvantages of ALIF are the additional anterior approach and the related complications. The most frequent complication is due to damage of vessels. The rate of complications is significantly increased in revision surgery. CONCLUSION: The ALIF technique meaningfully expands the repertoire of the spinal surgeon especially for the treatment of non-union after interbody fusion, in patients with epidural scar tissue at the index level and spinal infections. Advantages and disadvantages should be considered when evaluating the indications for ALIF.
Authors: Rick C Sasso; Natalie M Best; Praveen V Mummaneni; Thomas M Reilly; Sajjad M Hussain Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Thomas G Lowe; Shukor Hashim; Lucas A Wilson; Michael F O'Brien; David A B Smith; Molly J Diekmann; Julie Trommeter Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Salvador A Brau; Rick B Delamarter; Michael L Schiffman; Lytton A Williams; Robert G Watkins Journal: Spine J Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Gary A Fantini; Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi; Harvinder S Sandhu; Frank P Cammisa Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: James D Schwender; Michael T Casnellie; Joseph H Perra; Ensor E Transfeldt; Manuel R Pinto; Francis Denis; Timothy A Garvey; David W Polly; Amir A Mehbod; Daryll C Dykes; Robert B Winter; Jill M Wroblewski Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Manuel Fernandes Marques; Vincent Fiere; Ibrahim Obeid; Yann-Philippe Charles; Khaled El-Youssef; Abi Lahoud; Joe Faddoul; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Guillaume Riouallon; Clément Silvestre; Jean-Charles Le Huec; David Kieser; Louis Boissiere Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 3.134