Literature DB >> 33950287

Pseudarthrosis in adult spine deformity surgery: risk factors and treatment options.

Manuel Fernandes Marques1, Vincent Fiere2, Ibrahim Obeid3,4, Yann-Philippe Charles5, Khaled El-Youssef6, Abi Lahoud7, Joe Faddoul7, Emmanuelle Ferrero8, Guillaume Riouallon9, Clément Silvestre10, Jean-Charles Le Huec11, David Kieser12, Louis Boissiere3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Highlight risk factors for pseudarthrosis in long-segment spinal fusions, collect the approaches carried to address this complication.
METHODS: Patients with ASD and fusion of ≥ 4 levels with minimum follow-up (FU) of ≥ 2 years were included. Full-body X-rays were done preoperatively, < 3 months and ≥ 2 years. Oswestry disability index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22 and SF36 assessed pre- and postoperatively. The relationship between demographic, surgical and radiological variables with the development of pseudarthrosis was evaluated.
RESULTS: Out of 524 patients included, 65 patients (12.4%) developed pseudarthrosis and 53 underwent revision surgery. Notably, 88% of pseudarthrosis cases are associated with fusion length (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.292, p = 0.004), osteotomy requirement (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09-0.85, p = 0.025), pelvic fixation (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.13-0.88, p = 0.026) and combined approaches (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.09-9.91, p = 0.034). Sagittal alignment is not related to the rate of pseudarthrosis. Health related and quality of life scores were comparable at last FU between patients revised for pseudarthrosis and those that didn't require revision surgery (ODI = 28% no revision and 30% revision group).
CONCLUSIONS: Pseudarthrosis is not related to malalignment, but with the surgical techniques employed for its treatment. Anterior approaches with anterior support decrease the rate by 30%, while long fusions, osteotomies and pelvic fixation increase its rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alignment; Deformity; Pseudarthrosis; Risk; Scoliosis; Spine

Year:  2021        PMID: 33950287     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06861-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  Rod fracture after long construct fusion for spinal deformity: clinical and radiographic risk factors.

Authors:  Tsutomu Akazawa; Toshiaki Kotani; Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Tetsuharu Nemoto; Shohei Minami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  Bone morphogenetic protein 7 and autologous bone graft in revision surgery for non-union after lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Stephan Werle; Kais AbuNahleh; Heinrich Boehm
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Rod Fracture After Apparently Solid Radiographic Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; J Mason DePasse; Wesley Durand; D Kojo Hamilton; Peter Passias; Han Jo Kim; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Daniel B C Reid; Virginie LaFage; Justin S Smith; Christopher Shaffrey; Munish Gupta; Eric Klineberg; Frank Schwab; Doug Burton; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames; Robert A Hart
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Ellen Shaffrey; Eric Klineberg; Christopher I Shaffrey; Virginie Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Justin K Scheer; Gregory M Mundis; Kai-Ming G Fu; Munish C Gupta; Richard Hostin; Vedat Deviren; Khaled Kebaish; Robert Hart; Douglas C Burton; Breton Line; Shay Bess; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-10-17

5.  Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Kelly R Bratcher; Chelsea E Canan; Lauren O Burke; Mladen Djurasovic; Steven D Glassman
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-16

6.  Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames; Jason Demakakos; Kai-Ming G Fu; Sassan Keshavarzi; Carol M Y Li; Vedat Deviren; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Shay Bess
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score: Development and Validation of a New Method of Analyzing Spinopelvic Alignment to Predict Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Caglar Yilgor; Nuray Sogunmez; Louis Boissiere; Yasemin Yavuz; Ibrahim Obeid; Frank Kleinstück; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Emre Acaroglu; Sleiman Haddad; Anne F Mannion; Ferran Pellise; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Pseudarthrosis in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of incidence, characteristics, and risk factors.

Authors:  Nathan E How; John T Street; Marcel F Dvorak; Charles G Fisher; Brian K Kwon; Scott Paquette; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Tamir Ailon
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  The diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities to detect pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Marloes J M Peters; Carolien H G Bastiaenen; Boudewijn T Brans; René E Weijers; Paul C Willems
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Risk factors for rod fracture after posterior correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy: a retrospective case-series.

Authors:  Cameron Barton; Andriy Noshchenko; Vikas Patel; Christopher Cain; Christopher Kleck; Evalina Burger
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.