Literature DB >> 21153015

[Minimally invasive anterior approaches to the lumbosacral junction].

Andreas Korge1, Christoph Siepe, Christoph Mehren, H Michael Mayer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive anterior preparation of the lumbosacral junction L5/S1 via a retro- or transperitoneal approach, possibility of intervertebral mono- or bisegmental rigid (cage, bone graft) or dynamic (disc arthroplasty) segmental stabilization. INDICATIONS: Degenerative disc disease (DDD) with or without disc herniation. DDD with translatoric or frontal instability. Degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis. Adjacent segment degeneration post fusionem. Failed back surgery syndrome (post discectomy, non-union). Spinal stenosis with dynamic segmental instability. Spondylitis/spondylodiscitis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Previous transperitoneal lumbar fusion surgery. Adipositas permagna. Relative: Previous abdominal or gynaecological surgery. Aorta bifurcation and/or venous confluens directly in front of the lumbosacral disc space. Inflammation with large prevertebral granulation tissue formation or psoas abscess. Diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Anterior horizontal or vertical midline incision over L5/S1. Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach via the left or right lower abdomen. Retroperitoneal technique: medialization of the peritoneal sack towards the contralateral side. Transperitoneal technique: mini laparatomy, dissection of the visceral and parietal peritoneum and mobilization of the bowels laterally. Preparation of the anterolateral circumference of the L5/S1 disc space and mobilization of the vessels laterally. Discectomy and preparation of graft bed. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Functional postoperative care with mobilisation without external support following total lumbar disc replacement; stable trunk brace for 12 weeks in the case of fusion surgeries; no restrictions for standing, walking or sitting.
RESULTS: Between January 2002 and December 2007, 454 patients (248 female, 206 male, average age 47.3 years, range between 15.4 years and 80.0 years,) underwent anterior surgery in the lumbosacral segment using a minimally invasive anterior approach. The spectrum of indications included monosegmental disc degeneration, spinal stenosis with segmental instability, isthmic oder degenerative spondylolisthesis, spondylodiscitis and others. Dynamic segmental support using total lumbar disc replacement was performed in 251 cases. Rigid stabilization with combined posterior internal fixation and anterior interbody fusion was performed in 203 cases (alternatively cage, tricortical iliac crest bone graft, bone substitutes such as hydroxyapatite or bone morphogenetic protein [BMP]). Approach-related, vascular complications occurred in 0.5 % (mainly left common iliac vein). Injuries of the gastrointestinal tract or urogenital tract (kidney, ureter, bladder) did not occur and there were no infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153015     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-8051-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  16 in total

1.  Microsurgical anterior approaches to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion and total disc replacement.

Authors:  H Michael Mayer; Karsten Wiechert
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  The use of computed tomography angiography to define the prevertebral vascular anatomy prior to anterior lumbar procedures.

Authors:  Jason C Datta; Michael E Janssen; Ruth Beckham; Caroline Ponce
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Methods and complications of anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Robert W Ikard
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-10

Review 4.  Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  D Grob; H J Scheier; J Dvorak; H Siegrist; M Rubeli; R Joller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. Analysis of Mayo Clinic series.

Authors:  R N Stauffer; M B Coventry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management.

Authors:  Gary A Fantini; Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi; Harvinder S Sandhu; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Mini-open approach to the spine for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: description of the procedure, results and complications.

Authors:  Salvador A Brau
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Anterior lumbar fusion: results, assessment techniques and prognostic factors.

Authors:  C G Greenough; L J Taylor; R D Fraser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Mini-open anterior spine surgery for anterior lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Ruey-Mo Lin; Kuo-Yuan Huang; Kuo-An Lai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Indications, technique, advantages and disadvantages].

Authors:  M Richter; M Weidenfeld; F P Uckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

3.  Is Hydronephrosis a Complication after Anterior Lumbar Surgery?

Authors:  Ruth M Parks; Eyal Behrbalk; Syed Mosharraf; Roger M Müller; Bronek M Boszczyk
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-12

4.  Intraoperative anti-inflammatory drugs combined with no drainage after MIS-TLIF in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: an RCT.

Authors:  Jinpeng Du; Junsong Yang; Liang Yan; Lequn Shan; Wentao Wang; Yong Fan; Dingjun Hao; Dageng Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.