Literature DB >> 25500572

Exploitation and recovery of a sea urchin predator has implications for the resilience of southern California kelp forests.

Scott L Hamilton1, Jennifer E Caselle2.   

Abstract

Size-structured predator-prey interactions can be altered by the history of exploitation, if that exploitation is itself size-selective. For example, selective harvesting of larger sized predators can release prey populations in cases where only large individuals are capable of consuming a particular prey species. In this study, we examined how the history of exploitation and recovery (inside marine reserves and due to fisheries management) of California sheephead (Semicossyphus pulcher) has affected size-structured interactions with sea urchin prey in southern California. We show that fishing changes size structure by reducing sizes and alters life histories of sheephead, while management measures that lessen or remove fishing impacts (e.g. marine reserves, effort restrictions) reverse these effects and result in increases in density, size and biomass. We show that predation on sea urchins is size-dependent, such that the diet of larger sheephead is composed of more and larger sized urchins than the diet of smaller fish. These results have implications for kelp forest resilience, because urchins can overgraze kelp in the absence of top-down control. From surveys in a network of marine reserves, we report negative relationships between the abundance of sheephead and urchins and the abundance of urchins and fleshy macroalgae (including giant kelp), indicating the potential for cascading indirect positive effects of top predators on the abundance of primary producers. Management measures such as increased minimum size limits and marine reserves may serve to restore historical trophic roles of key predators and thereby enhance the resilience of marine ecosystems.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  California sheephead; Semicossyphus pulcher; kelp forest resilience; marine protected areas; recovery from fishing; size-structured trophic interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25500572      PMCID: PMC4286036          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  21 in total

1.  Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton.

Authors:  J L Brooks; S I Dodson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Decline in top predator body size and changing climate alter trophic structure in an oceanic ecosystem.

Authors:  Nancy L Shackell; Kenneth T Frank; Jonathan A D Fisher; Brian Petrie; William C Leggett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Incorporating biogeography into evaluations of the Channel Islands marine reserve network.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jennifer E Caselle; Dan P Malone; Mark H Carr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Decadal trends in marine reserves reveal differential rates of change in direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  R C Babcock; N T Shears; A C Alcala; N S Barrett; G J Edgar; K D Lafferty; T R McClanahan; G R Russ
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Trophic downgrading of planet Earth.

Authors:  James A Estes; John Terborgh; Justin S Brashares; Mary E Power; Joel Berger; William J Bond; Stephen R Carpenter; Timothy E Essington; Robert D Holt; Jeremy B C Jackson; Robert J Marquis; Lauri Oksanen; Tarja Oksanen; Robert T Paine; Ellen K Pikitch; William J Ripple; Stuart A Sandin; Marten Scheffer; Thomas W Schoener; Jonathan B Shurin; Anthony R E Sinclair; Michael E Soulé; Risto Virtanen; David A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Marine reserves reestablish lost predatory interactions and cause community changes in rocky reefs.

Authors:  Paolo Guidetti
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Overfishing reduces resilience of kelp beds to climate-driven catastrophic phase shift.

Authors:  S D Ling; C R Johnson; S D Frusher; K R Ridgway
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Direct and indirect effects of giant kelp determine benthic community structure and dynamics.

Authors:  Katie K Arkema; Daniel C Reed; Stephen C Schroeter
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Temperate marine reserves enhance targeted but not untargeted fishes in multiple no-take MPAs.

Authors:  Irene Tetreault; Richard F Ambrose
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.657

10.  Size-selective harvesting alters life histories of a temperate sex-changing fish.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jennifer E Caselle; Julie D Standish; Donna M Schroeder; Milton S Love; Jorge A Rosales-Casian; Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.657

View more
  13 in total

1.  Protection of large predators in a marine reserve alters size-dependent prey mortality.

Authors:  Rebecca L Selden; Steven D Gaines; Scott L Hamilton; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Behavioral responses across a mosaic of ecosystem states restructure a sea otter-urchin trophic cascade.

Authors:  Joshua G Smith; Joseph Tomoleoni; Michelle Staedler; Sophia Lyon; Jessica Fujii; M Tim Tinker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Conspecific cues, not starvation, mediate barren urchin response to predation risk.

Authors:  Christopher J Knight; Robert P Dunn; Jeremy D Long
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, increases faunal diversity through physical engineering.

Authors:  Robert J Miller; Kevin D Lafferty; Thomas Lamy; Li Kui; Andrew Rassweiler; Daniel C Reed
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Predator type influences the frequency of functional responses to prey in marine habitats.

Authors:  Robert P Dunn; Kevin A Hovel
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  After 15 years, no evidence for trophic cascades in marine protected areas.

Authors:  Katrina D Malakhoff; Robert J Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Resilience of aquatic systems: Review and management implications.

Authors:  Marguerite C Pelletier; Joe Ebersole; Kate Mulvaney; Brenda Rashleigh; Mary Nicole Gutierrez; Marnita Chintala; Anne Kuhn; Marirosa Molina; Mark Bagley; Chuck Lane
Journal:  Aquat Sci       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 2.755

8.  Recovery trajectories of kelp forest animals are rapid yet spatially variable across a network of temperate marine protected areas.

Authors:  Jennifer E Caselle; Andrew Rassweiler; Scott L Hamilton; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Historical ecology and the conservation of large, hermaphroditic fishes in Pacific Coast kelp forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Todd J Braje; Torben C Rick; Paul Szpak; Seth D Newsome; Joseph M McCain; Emma A Elliott Smith; Michael Glassow; Scott L Hamilton
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Reduction and recovery of keystone predation pressure after disease-related mass mortality.

Authors:  Monica M Moritsch; Peter T Raimondi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.