Literature DB >> 28123086

Protection of large predators in a marine reserve alters size-dependent prey mortality.

Rebecca L Selden1, Steven D Gaines2, Scott L Hamilton3, Robert R Warner4.   

Abstract

Where predator-prey interactions are size-dependent, reductions in predator size owing to fishing has the potential to disrupt the ecological role of top predators in marine ecosystems. In southern California kelp forests, we investigated the size-dependence of the interaction between herbivorous sea urchins and one of their predators, California sheephead (Semicossyphus pulcher). Empirical tests examined how differences in predator size structure between reserve and fished areas affected size-specific urchin mortality. Sites inside marine reserves had greater sheephead size and biomass, while empirical feeding trials indicated that larger sheephead were required to successfully consume urchins of increasing test diameter. Evaluations of the selectivity of sheephead for two urchin species indicated that shorter-spined purple urchins were attacked more frequently and successfully than longer-spined red urchins of the same size class, particularly at the largest test diameters. As a result of these size-specific interactions and the higher biomass of large sheephead inside reserves, urchin mortality rates were three times higher inside the reserve for both species. In addition, urchin mortality rates decreased with urchin size, and very few large urchins were successfully consumed in fished areas. The truncation of sheephead size structure that commonly occurs owing to fishing will probably result in reductions in urchin mortality, which may reduce the resilience of kelp beds to urchin barren formation. By contrast, the recovery of predator size structure in marine reserves may restore this resilience, but may be delayed until fish grow to sizes capable of consuming larger urchins.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  kelp forest; marine reserves; size refuge; size-dependent predation; urchin

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28123086      PMCID: PMC5310031          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  Body size in ecological networks.

Authors:  Guy Woodward; Bo Ebenman; Mark Emmerson; Jose M Montoya; Jens M Olesen; Alfredo Valido; Philip H Warren
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Decline in top predator body size and changing climate alter trophic structure in an oceanic ecosystem.

Authors:  Nancy L Shackell; Kenneth T Frank; Jonathan A D Fisher; Brian Petrie; William C Leggett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Decadal trends in marine reserves reveal differential rates of change in direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  R C Babcock; N T Shears; A C Alcala; N S Barrett; G J Edgar; K D Lafferty; T R McClanahan; G R Russ
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Collaborative assessment of California spiny lobster population and fishery responses to a marine reserve network.

Authors:  Matthew C Kay; Hunter S Lenihan; Carla M Guenther; Jono R Wilson; Christopher J Miller; Samuel W Shrout
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Marine reserves reestablish lost predatory interactions and cause community changes in rocky reefs.

Authors:  Paolo Guidetti
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Marine reserves reduce risk of climate-driven phase shift by reinstating size- and habitat-specific trophic interactions.

Authors:  S D Ling; C R Johnson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Overfishing reduces resilience of kelp beds to climate-driven catastrophic phase shift.

Authors:  S D Ling; C R Johnson; S D Frusher; K R Ridgway
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Size-selective harvesting alters life histories of a temperate sex-changing fish.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jennifer E Caselle; Julie D Standish; Donna M Schroeder; Milton S Love; Jorge A Rosales-Casian; Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.657

10.  Utilizing spatial demographic and life history variation to optimize sustainable yield of a temperate sex-changing fish.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jono R Wilson; Tal Ben-Horin; Jennifer E Caselle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Behavioral responses across a mosaic of ecosystem states restructure a sea otter-urchin trophic cascade.

Authors:  Joshua G Smith; Joseph Tomoleoni; Michelle Staedler; Sophia Lyon; Jessica Fujii; M Tim Tinker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Conspecific cues, not starvation, mediate barren urchin response to predation risk.

Authors:  Christopher J Knight; Robert P Dunn; Jeremy D Long
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.298

3.  After 15 years, no evidence for trophic cascades in marine protected areas.

Authors:  Katrina D Malakhoff; Robert J Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Trophic redundancy and predator size class structure drive differences in kelp forest ecosystem dynamics.

Authors:  Jacob H Eisaguirre; Joseph M Eisaguirre; Kathryn Davis; Peter M Carlson; Steven D Gaines; Jennifer E Caselle
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Expanded consumer niche widths may signal an early response to spatial protection.

Authors:  Angeleen M Olson; Rowan Trebilco; Anne K Salomon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.