Literature DB >> 20176941

Decadal trends in marine reserves reveal differential rates of change in direct and indirect effects.

R C Babcock1, N T Shears, A C Alcala, N S Barrett, G J Edgar, K D Lafferty, T R McClanahan, G R Russ.   

Abstract

Decadal-scale observations of marine reserves suggest that indirect effects on taxa that occur through cascading trophic interactions take longer to develop than direct effects on target species. Combining and analyzing a unique set of long-term time series of ecologic data in and out of fisheries closures from disparate regions, we found that the time to initial detection of direct effects on target species (±SE) was 5.13 ± 1.9 years, whereas initial detection of indirect effects on other taxa, which were often trait mediated, took significantly longer (13.1 ± 2.0 years). Most target species showed initial direct effects, but their trajectories over time were highly variable. Many target species continued to increase, some leveled off, and others decreased. Decreases were due to natural fluctuations, fishing impacts from outside reserves, or indirect effects from target species at higher trophic levels. The average duration of stable periods for direct effects was 6.2 ± 1.2 years, even in studies of more than 15 years. For indirect effects, stable periods averaged 9.1 ± 1.6 years, although this was not significantly different from direct effects. Populations of directly targeted species were more stable in reserves than in fished areas, suggesting increased ecologic resilience. This is an important benefit of marine reserves with respect to their function as a tool for conservation and restoration.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20176941      PMCID: PMC2972978          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908012107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

1.  The worldwide costs of marine protected areas.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Pippa Gravestock; Neal Hockley; Colin J McClean; Callum M Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fishing, trophic cascades, and the process of grazing on coral reefs.

Authors:  Peter J Mumby; Craig P Dahlgren; Alastair R Harborne; Carrie V Kappel; Fiorenza Micheli; Daniel R Brumbaugh; Katherine E Holmes; Judith M Mendes; Kenneth Broad; James N Sanchirico; Kevin Buch; Steve Box; Richard W Stoffle; Andrew B Gill
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Detection of direct versus indirect effects: were experiments long enough?

Authors:  B A Menge
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Coastal marine communities: trends and perspectives from human-exclusion experiments.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Linking social and ecological systems to sustain coral reef fisheries.

Authors:  Joshua E Cinner; Timothy R McClanahan; Tim M Daw; Nicholas A J Graham; Joseph Maina; Shaun K Wilson; Terence P Hughes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.834

  5 in total
  70 in total

1.  Evolving science of marine reserves: new developments and emerging research frontiers.

Authors:  Steven D Gaines; Sarah E Lester; Kirsten Grorud-Colvert; Christopher Costello; Richard Pollnac
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Decadal-scale rebuilding of predator biomass in Philippine marine reserves.

Authors:  Garry R Russ; Angel C Alcala
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Recovery potential of the world's coral reef fishes.

Authors:  M Aaron MacNeil; Nicholas A J Graham; Joshua E Cinner; Shaun K Wilson; Ivor D Williams; Joseph Maina; Steven Newman; Alan M Friedlander; Stacy Jupiter; Nicholas V C Polunin; Tim R McClanahan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Exploitation and recovery of a sea urchin predator has implications for the resilience of southern California kelp forests.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jennifer E Caselle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Protection of large predators in a marine reserve alters size-dependent prey mortality.

Authors:  Rebecca L Selden; Steven D Gaines; Scott L Hamilton; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Biological interactions both facilitate and resist climate-related functional change in temperate reef communities.

Authors:  Amanda E Bates; Rick D Stuart-Smith; Neville S Barrett; Graham J Edgar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features.

Authors:  Graham J Edgar; Rick D Stuart-Smith; Trevor J Willis; Stuart Kininmonth; Susan C Baker; Stuart Banks; Neville S Barrett; Mikel A Becerro; Anthony T F Bernard; Just Berkhout; Colin D Buxton; Stuart J Campbell; Antonia T Cooper; Marlene Davey; Sophie C Edgar; Günter Försterra; David E Galván; Alejo J Irigoyen; David J Kushner; Rodrigo Moura; P Ed Parnell; Nick T Shears; German Soler; Elisabeth M A Strain; Russell J Thomson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Understanding modern extinctions in marine ecosystems: the role of palaeoecological data.

Authors:  Matthew A Kosnik; Michał Kowalewski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Participation, process quality, and performance of marine protected areas in the wider Caribbean.

Authors:  Tracey Dalton; Graham Forrester; Richard Pollnac
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Homing behaviour by destructive crown-of-thorns starfish is triggered by local availability of coral prey.

Authors:  S D Ling; Z-L Cowan; J Boada; E B Flukes; M S Pratchett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.