Literature DB >> 25496048

Comparing clinical effectiveness and drug toxicity with hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone using two potency ratios in a managed care population.

Joseph J Saseen1, Vahram Ghushchyan, Kavita V Nair.   

Abstract

This study compared the clinical effectiveness and drug toxicity of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide. Electronic health records and claims data were used to identify patients initially prescribed chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide. A total of 214 patients prescribed chlorthalidone 25 mg were matched with 428 patients prescribed hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (1:1 potency ratio) and 214 patients prescribed hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg (1:2 potency ratio). Mean systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure values at least 30 days after initial prescription were lower with chlorthalidone (132.2/74 mm Hg) compared with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (137.0/77.5 mm Hg) and hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg (138.6/78.5 mm Hg) (P<.05 for all comparisons). Goal systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure values were achieved in a higher percentage of patients prescribed chlorthalidone (45.0%/78.3%) than with either hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (32.1%/63.9%) or hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg (32.8%/68.9%) (P<.05 for all comparisons). Mean serum potassium was 3.94 mEq/L with chlorthalidone 25 mg, 4.13 mEq/L with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (P<.01 vs chlorthalidone), and 3.96 mEq/L with hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg. These findings indicate that chlorthalidone 25 mg is associated with a better antihypertensive response than hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg or 50 mg, without clinically significant differences in serum potassium.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25496048      PMCID: PMC8031593          DOI: 10.1111/jch.12453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  24 in total

1.  Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Franz H Messerli; Harikrishna Makani; Alexandre Benjo; Jorge Romero; Carlos Alviar; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  EFFECTS OF ORAL DIURETICS ON RAISED ARTERIAL PRESSURE.

Authors:  W I CRANSTON; B E JUEL-JENSEN; A M SEMMENCE; R P JONES; J A FORBES; L M MUTCH
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1963-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Use of diuretics in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Michael E Ernst; Marvin Moser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; David Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Pamela J Schreiner; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Chlorthalidone reduces cardiovascular events compared with hydrochlorothiazide: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Dorsch; Brenda W Gillespie; Steven R Erickson; Barry E Bleske; Alan B Weder
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 8.  Hypertension and coronary artery disease: a summary of the American Heart Association scientific statement.

Authors:  Clive Rosendorff
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community: a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  Michael A Weber; Ernesto L Schiffrin; William B White; Samuel Mann; Lars H Lindholm; John G Kenerson; John M Flack; Barry L Carter; Barry J Materson; C Venkata S Ram; Debbie L Cohen; Jean-Claude Cadet; Roger R Jean-Charles; Sandra Taler; David Kountz; Raymond R Townsend; John Chalmers; Agustin J Ramirez; George L Bakris; Jiguang Wang; Aletta E Schutte; John D Bisognano; Rhian M Touyz; Dominic Sica; Stephen B Harrap
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Comparing clinical effectiveness and drug toxicity with hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone using two potency ratios in a managed care population.

Authors:  Joseph J Saseen; Vahram Ghushchyan; Kavita V Nair
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  6 in total

1.  Treatment of hypertension in CKD patients with azilsartan/chlorthalidone vs olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  Walter M van der Merwe
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-03-04       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Plasma Renin Activity Is a Predictive Biomarker of Blood Pressure Response in European but not in African Americans With Uncomplicated Hypertension.

Authors:  Mai Mehanna; Zhiying Wang; Yan Gong; Caitrin W McDonough; Amber L Beitelshees; John G Gums; Arlene B Chapman; Gary L Schwartz; Kent R Bailey; Julie A Johnson; Stephen T Turner; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.080

3.  Race-Specific Comparisons of Antihypertensive and Metabolic Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone.

Authors:  Lakshmi Manasa S Chekka; Arlene B Chapman; John G Gums; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.928

4.  S-amlodipine plus chlorthalidone vs. S-amlodipine plus telmisartan in hypertensive patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sang-Ho Jo; Sung-Ji Park; Eung Ju Kim; Soo-Joong Kim; Hyun-Jae Cho; Jong-Min Song; Jinho Shin; Jin Joo Park; Joon-Han Shin; Kyoo-Rok Han; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Comparing clinical effectiveness and drug toxicity with hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone using two potency ratios in a managed care population.

Authors:  Joseph J Saseen; Vahram Ghushchyan; Kavita V Nair
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Network meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Stela Dineva; Katya Uzunova; Velichka Pavlova; Elena Filipova; Krassimir Kalinov; Toni Vekov
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 1.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.