Literature DB >> 30753254

Plasma Renin Activity Is a Predictive Biomarker of Blood Pressure Response in European but not in African Americans With Uncomplicated Hypertension.

Mai Mehanna1, Zhiying Wang2, Yan Gong1, Caitrin W McDonough1, Amber L Beitelshees3, John G Gums1, Arlene B Chapman4, Gary L Schwartz5, Kent R Bailey6, Julie A Johnson1, Stephen T Turner5, Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interindividual variability in blood pressure (BP) response to antihypertensives has been reported. Although plasma renin activity (PRA) is a potential biomarker for personalizing antihypertensive therapy in European American (EA) and African American (AA) hypertensives, clinical utility of PRA-guided prescribing is incompletely understood.
METHODS: Using systematic-phased approach, PRA's clinical utility was assessed. After categorizing by baseline PRA, clinic systolic BP (SBP) responses to metoprolol and chlorthalidone were compared in 134 EAs and 102 AAs enrolled in the Pharmacogenomics Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses-2 (PEAR-2) trial. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted in EAs. Data from PEAR-2 AAs were used to estimate an optimal PRA cut point using multivariable linear regression models. The derived cut point in AAs was tested in a meta-analysis of 2 independent AA cohorts, and its sensitivity and specificity were assessed.
RESULTS: EAs with PRA < 0.65 ng/ml/hour had a greater decrease in SBP to chlorthalidone than metoprolol (by -15.9 mm Hg, adjusted P < 0.0001), whereas those with PRA ≥ 0.65 ng/ml/hour had a greater decrease in SBP to metoprolol than chlorthalidone (by 3.3 mm Hg, adjusted P = 0.04). Area under ROC curve (0.69, P = 0.0001) showed that PRA can predict SBP response among EAs. However, we observed no association between PRA and SBP response in PEAR-2 AAs. Among independent AA cohorts, those with PRA ≥ 1.3 ng/ml/hour (PEAR-2-derived cut point) responded better to atenolol/candesartan than hydrochlorothiazide (meta-analysis P = 0.01). However, sensitivity of the derived cut point was 10%.
CONCLUSIONS: PRA at the previously established 0.60-0.65 ng/ml/hour cut point is an effective predictive biomarker of BP response in EAs. However, we were unable to identify PRA cut point that could be used to guide antihypertensive selection in AAs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01203852, NCT00246519, NCT00005520. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2019. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African Americans; European Americans; blood pressure; hypertension; plasma renin activity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30753254      PMCID: PMC6558666          DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpz022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   3.080


  38 in total

Review 1.  Laragh's lessons in pathophysiology and clinical pearls for treating hypertension.

Authors:  J Laragh
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Laragh's lessons in pathophysiology and clinical pearls for treating hypertension.

Authors:  J Laragh
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 3.  Laragh's lessons in pathophysiology and clinical pearls for treating hypertension. Lesson XXIV: on the major roles of the renin system in the pathogenesis of hypertension and of its sequelae, heart attack, heart failure, kidney failure, and stroke: replies to commonly asked questions.

Authors:  J Laragh
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Overlap between whites and blacks in response to antihypertensive drugs.

Authors:  Ashwini R Sehgal
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Cardiovascular disease costs associated with uncontrolled hypertension.

Authors:  John M Flack; Roman Casciano; Julian Casciano; James Doyle; Steven Arikian; Simon Tang; Raul Arocho
Journal:  Manag Care Interface       Date:  2002-11

6.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Systematic review: antihypertensive drug therapy in black patients.

Authors:  Lizzy M Brewster; Gert A van Montfrans; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-10-19       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Plasma renin activity and insulin resistance in African American and white children: the Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  W Chen; S R Srinivasan; G S Berenson
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 9.  Common questions and answers in the management of hypertension: routine measurement of plasma renin activity in the management of patients with essential hypertension: notes from the 19th Annual ASH Meeting.

Authors:  Ari Mosenkis; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in African Americans with hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Elijah Saunders; James R Gavin
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  3 in total

1.  Hypertension Pharmacogenomics in CKD: The Clinical Relevance and Public Health Implications.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Geng; Tazeen H Jafar
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-02-24

2.  Lack of Effects of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Activity and Beta-Adrenoceptor Pathway Polymorphisms on the Response to Bisoprolol in Hypertension.

Authors:  Weiwei Zeng; Tanya T W Chu; Chung Shun Ho; Clara W S Lo; Alan S L Chan; Alice P S Kong; Brian Tomlinson; Sze Wa Chan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Optimizing Precision of Hypertension Care to Maximize Blood Pressure Control: A Pilot Study Utilizing a Smartphone App to Incorporate Plasma Renin Activity Testing.

Authors:  Mai Mehanna; Yiqing E Chen; Yan Gong; Eileen Handberg; Brittney Roth; Jessica De Leon; Steven M Smith; Jonathan G Harrell; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.689

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.