| Literature DB >> 25495180 |
Jens Popken1, Daniela Koehler, Alessandro Brero, Annegret Wuensch, Tuna Guengoer, Tobias Thormeyer, Eckhard Wolf, Thomas Cremer, Valeri Zakhartchenko.
Abstract
Cloned bovine preimplantation embryos were generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) of bovine fetal fibroblasts with a silent copy of the pluripotency reporter gene GOF, integrated at a single site of a chromosome 13. GOF combines the regulatory Oct4/Pou5f1 sequence with the coding sequence for EGFP. EGFP expression served as a marker for pluripotency gene activation and was consistently detected in preimplantation embryos with 9 and more cells. Three-dimensional radial nuclear positions of GOF, its carrier chromosome territory and non-carrier homolog were measured in nuclei of fibroblasts, and of day 2 and day 4 embryos, carrying 2 to 9 and 15 to 22 cells, respectively. We tested, whether transcriptional activation was correlated with repositioning of GOF toward the nuclear interior either with a corresponding movement of its carrier chromosome territory 13 or via the formation of a giant chromatin loop. A significant shift of GOF away from the nuclear periphery was observed in day 2 embryos together with both carrier and non-carrier chromosome territories. At day 4, GOF, its carrier chromosome territory 13 and the non-carrier homolog had moved back toward the nuclear periphery. Similar movements of both chromosome territories ruled out a specific GOF effect. Pluripotency gene activation was preceded by a transient, radial shift of GOF toward the nuclear interior. The persistent co-localization of GOF with its carrier chromosome territory rules out the formation of a giant chromatin loop during GOF activation.Entities:
Keywords: (bovine) preimplantation embryos, chromosome territories, nuclear architecture, nuclear reprogramming, pluripotency gene activation, somatic cell nuclear transfer; BFF, bovine fetal fibroblasts; BTA, Bos taurus; CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; CT, chromosome territory; eADS, enhanced absolute 3D distances to surfaces; IVF, in vitro fertilization; MGA, major embryonic genome activation; GOF, Oct4/Pou5f1-EGF
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25495180 PMCID: PMC4615807 DOI: 10.4161/19491034.2014.970107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nucleus ISSN: 1949-1034 Impact factor: 4.197
Figure 1.Chromosome 13 painting combined with FISH of the pluripotency marker gene GOF. (A1) Wide-field, digital, fluorescence microscopy from a bovine fetal fibroblast metaphase spread after 3-color FISH shows DAPI stained chromosomes (blue) painted chromosomes 13 (red), the pluripotency marker gene GOF (green) and α-satellite DNA clusters in pericentromeric heterochromatin (white). (A2) Magnification of the boxed carrier chromosome 13 demonstrates the integration of GOF on 13q near the pericentromeric heterochromatin.
Figure 2.Variability of higher order chromatin arrangements of the pluripotency marker gene GOF, its carrier chromosome territory (CT) 13 and the non-carrier homolog. Panels A-F. CSLM images were recorded from 6 nuclei A-F representative for the variability of radial nuclear arrangements of GOF (green), its carrier and non-carrier chromosome territories 13 (red): 2 fibroblast nuclei (A and B), 2 embryonic nuclei from cloned embryos at day 2 (C and D), and 2 nuclei from cloned embryos at day 4 (E and F). DAPI stained DNA is presented in gray. X/Y-sections (A1-F1) and X/Z sections (A2-F2) were taken at positions including the painted carrier chromosome territory with the GOF signal. Two white arrows in A1-F1 indicate the site, where the X/Z section was taken perpendicular to the X/Y section. Correspondingly, 2 white arrows in A2-F2 indicate the site, where the X/Y section was taken perpendicular to the X/Z section. A3-F3 show partial 3D reconstructions of the same nuclei presenting the location of the carrier and non-carrier chromosome territories 13. A4-F4 show enlarged, virtual sections of the carrier chromosome territory with GOF signals representing the nearest position of GOF to the DAPI stained nuclear border. Bars: 3 μm for A1-F1, A2-F2, A3-F3; 2 μm for A4-F4.
Chromosomal gains and losses in cloned and IVF bovine embryos
| Number of painted CTs per nucleus | Number of GOF signals | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Painted CT | Embryos analyzed | Nuclei analyzed | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| This study | BFF | CT 13 | - | 50 | 10 (20%) | 39 (78%) | 0 | 1 (2%) | 0 | 50 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NT D2 | 25 | 95 | 7 (7.4%) | 63 (66.3%) | 13 (13.7%) | 6 (6.3%) | 6 (6.3%) | 71 (74.7%) | 16 (16.8%) | 1 (1.1%) | 2 (2.1%) | ||
| | NT D4 | | 6 | 32 | 3 (9.4%) | 27 (84.4%) | 1 (3.1%) | 1 (3.1%) | 0 | 29 (90.6%) | 1 (3.1%) | 0 | 0 |
| Koehler et al. | IVF D1 | CT 19 | 7 | 19 | 9 (47.4%) | 8 (42.1%) | 2 (10.5%) | 0 | 0 | ||||
| IVF D2 | 10 | 37 | 8 (21.6%) | 29 (78.4%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| IVF D3 | 9 | 58 | 8 (13.8%) | 50 (86.2%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| IVF D1 | CT 20 | 7 | 19 | 9 (47.4%) | 10 (52.6%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| IVF D2 | 10 | 37 | 9 (24.3%) | 27 (73%) | 1 (2.7%) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| IVF D3 | 9 | 58 | 4 (6.9%) | 54 (93.1%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Following 2-color 3D-FISH with a chromosome territory 13 paint probe and a differentially labeled GOF probe, numbers of GOF, carrier and non-carrier chromosome territories 13 were counted in 3D image stacks recorded from nuclei of bovine fetal fibroblasts, cloned day 2 and day 4 embryos (NT D2 and NT D4, respectively) (compare Supplemental Figure S1). In our analysis we included only nuclei, which revealed at least 1 clearly identifiable GOF signal together with its painted carrier chromosome territory 13. Possible cases of two, spatially associated CTs 13 could not be identified and were therefore counted as a single territory. As expected for diploid nuclei, most fibroblast nuclei, as well as nuclei from NT D2 and NT D4 embryos, carried two CTs 13, but aberrant numbers of other CTs can, of course, not be excluded. Compared with fibroblast nuclei, a highly significant increase of nuclei (p <0.001) with gains of GOF and/or chromosome territories 13 was detected in cloned day 2 embryos. Nuclei of cloned day 4 embryos revealed a significant drop (p <0.05) of aberrations compared with cloned day 2 embryos and did no longer show a significant increase compared with fibroblast nuclei. For comparison with aberration frequencies in bovine IVF embryos at day 1, 2 and 3, we added hitherto unpublished counts of gains and losses of painted chromosomes 19 and 20 from a previous study.8 A statistical comparison of chromosomal missegregation events counted in cloned and IVF embryos at day 2 was performed under the assumption that chromosomes 13, 19 and 20 shared the same risk of mitotic missegregations. This comparison revealed a highly significantly increased risk of missegregations in cloned over IVF day 2 embryos.
Figure 3.(A) Volume measurements of bovine fetal fibroblast (BFF) nuclei, day 2 and day 4 embryonic nuclei. Compared with the volumes of fibroblast nuclei, a severalfold increase was noted for day 2 nuclei, whereas a decrease of nuclear volumes back to the level of fibroblast nuclei was noted in day 4 embryos. (B and C) Flat-ellipsoidal shaped fibroblast nuclei adopt a roundish shape in cloned embryos. (B) Scheme for the determination of nuclear roundness factors and relative radial distances. A roundness factor (RF) = 0 represents an extremely flat nucleus with zero axial extension, RF = 1 a perfect round shape. (C) Compared with RFs of fibroblast nuclei, RFs of nuclei in day 2 and day 4 embryos showed a severalfold increased roundness factor.
Figure 4.Quantitative analysis of radial nuclear arrangements of the pluripotency reporter gene GOF, its carrier chromosome territory (CT) 13 and the non-carrier homolog. (A) Absolute 3D distances from the 3D reconstructed nuclear border. (B) Relative 3D positions between the center of the nucleus (0) and the 3D reconstructed nuclear border (1). Combined box/scatter plots of GOF, the carrier and non-carrier chromosome territories CT 13 in fibroblast nuclei, day 2 embryonic nuclei and day 4 embryonic nuclei observed in cloned embryos at the onset of major embryonic genome activation and shortly thereafter demonstrate an extensive internuclear variability of these measurements. (C and D) present the data set shown in (A and B), respectively, in relation to the largest sphere, which could be embedded in each given nucleus (compare and ). Note that the variability of absolute distance measurements increased with the size of the embeddable sphere (C), whereas a similar variability was detected with respect to the relative radial positions (D).
Statistical analysis of differences between absolute, mean distances of GOF and chromosome territory (CT) 13 gravity centers to the nuclear border in bovine fetal fibroblasts (BFFs), day 2 and day 4 cloned embryos
| Group 1 | Mean distance (nm) | SD | Group 2 | Mean distance (nm) | SD | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. BFF, carrier CT 13 | 730 | 272 | Day 2, carrier CT 13 | 1730 | 1160 | <0.0001 |
| 2. Day 2, carrier CT 13 | 1730 | 1160 | Day 4, carrier CT 13 | 890 | 774 | <0.003 |
| 3. BFF, carrier CT 13 | 730 | 272 | Day 4, carrier CT 13 | 890 | 774 | 1 |
| 4. BFF, GOF | 1065 | 349 | Day 2, GOF | 1635 | 1119 | 0.2 |
| 5. Day 2, GOF | 1635 | 1119 | Day 4, GOF | 736 | 714 | <0.0002 |
| 6. BFF, GOF | 1065 | 349 | Day 4, GOF | 736 | 714 | <0.002 |
| Carrier vs. non-carrier CT (nm) | ||||||
| 7. BFF carrier CT 13 | 730 | 272 | BFF non-carrier CT | 969 | 426 | 0.07 |
| 8. Day 2, carrier CT 13 | 1730 | 1160 | Day 2, non-carrier CT | 1728 | 1136 | 0.8 |
| 9. Day 4, carrier CT 13 | 890 | 774 | Day 4, non-carrier CT | 1195 | 900 | 0.3 |
| Non-carrier vs. non-carrier CT (nm) | ||||||
| 10. BFF | 969 | 426 | Day 2 | 1728 | 1136 | <0.02 |
| 11. Day 2 | 1728 | 1136 | Day 4 | 1195 | 900 | 0.1 |
| 12. BFF | 969 | 426 | Day 4 | 1195 | 900 | 0.9 |
Statistical analysis of differences between relative, radial positions of GOF and chromosome territory (CT) 13 gravity centers in bovine fetal fibroblasts (BFFs), day 2 and day 4 cloned embryos
| Group 1 | Mean position | SD | Group 2 | Mean position | SD | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative positions (0 = nuclear center; 1 = nuclear border) | ||||||
| 1. BFF, carrier CT 13 | 0.65 | 0.12 | Day 2, carrier CT 13 | 0.74 | 0.16 | <0.01 |
| 2. Day 2, carrier CT 13 | 0.74 | 0.16 | Day 4, carrier CT 13 | 0.79 | 0.17 | 0.3 |
| 3. BFF, carrier CT 13 | 0.65 | 0.12 | Day 4, carrier CT 13 | 0.79 | 0.17 | <0.003 |
| 4. BFF, GOF | 0.49 | 0.15 | Day 2, GOF | 0.75 | 0.16 | <0.00001 |
| 5. Day 2, GOF | 0.75 | 0.16 | Day 4, GOF | 0.73 | 0.19 | 0.06 |
| 6. BFF, GOF | 0.49 | 0.15 | Day 4, GOF | 0.73 | 0.19 | <10–05 |
| Carrier vs. non-carrier CT (0 = nuclear center; 1 = nuclear border) | ||||||
| 7. BFF carrier CT 13 | 0.65 | 0.12 | BFF non-carrier CT | 0.54 | 0.17 | 0.06 |
| 8. Day 2, carrier CT 13 | 0.74 | 0.16 | Day 2, non-carrier CT | 0.74 | 0.17 | 1 |
| 9. Day 4, carrier CT 13 | 0.79 | 0.17 | Day 4, non-carrier CT | 0.73 | 0.19 | 0.4 |
| Non-carrier vs. non-carrier CT (0 = nuclear center; 1 = nuclear border) | ||||||
| 10. BFF | 0.54 | 0.17 | Day 2 | 0.74 | 0.17 | <0.001 |
| 11. Day 2 | 0.74 | 0.17 | Day 4 | 0.73 | 0.19 | 0.9 |
| 12. BFF | 0.54 | 0.17 | Day 4 | 0.73 | 0.19 | <0.003 |