Jeffrey B Taylor1,2, Kevin R Ford3, Randy J Schmitz4, Scott E Ross4, Terry A Ackerman5, Sandra J Shultz4. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, One University Parkway, High Point, NC, 27268, USA. jtaylor@highpoint.edu. 2. Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA. jtaylor@highpoint.edu. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, One University Parkway, High Point, NC, 27268, USA. 4. Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA. 5. American College Testing, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the extent to which an ACL injury prevention programme modifies lower extremity biomechanics during single- and double-leg landing tasks in both the sagittal and frontal plane. It was hypothesized that the training programme would elicit improvements in lower extremity biomechanics, but that these improvements would be greater during a double-leg sagittal plane landing task than tasks performed on a single leg or in the frontal plane. METHODS:Ninety-seven competitive multi-directional sport athletes that competed at the middle- or high-school level were cluster randomized into intervention (n = 48, age = 15.4 ± 1.0 years, height = 1.7 ± 0.07 m, mass = 59.9 ± 11.0 kg) and control (n = 49, age = 15.7 ± 1.6 years, height = 1.7 ± 0.06 m, mass = 60.4 ± 7.7 kg) groups. The intervention group participated in an established 6-week warm-up-based ACL injury prevention programme. Three-dimensional biomechanical analyses of a double- (SAG-DL) and single-leg (SAG-SL) sagittal, and double- (FRONT-DL) and single-leg (FRONT-SL) frontal plane jump landing tasks were tested before and after the intervention. Peak angles, excursions, and external joint moments were analysed for group differences using 2 (group) × 4 (task) repeated measures MANOVA models of delta scores (post-pre-test value) (α < 0.05). RESULTS: Relative to the control group, no significant biomechanical changes were identified in the intervention group for any of the tasks (n.s.). However, a group by task interaction was identified for knee abduction (λ = 0.80, p = 0.02), such that participants in the intervention group showed relative decreases in knee abduction moments during the SAG-DL compared to the SAG-SL (p = 0.005; d = 0.45, CI = 0.04-0.85) task. CONCLUSION: A 6-week warm-up-based ACL injury prevention programme resulted in no significant biomechanical changes during a variety of multi-directional jump landings. Clinically, future prevention programmes should provide a greater training stimulus (intensity, volume), more specificity to tasks associated with the mechanism of ACL injury (single-leg, non-sagittal plane jump landings), and longer programme duration (> 6 weeks) to elicit meaningful biomechanical changes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To examine the extent to which an ACL injury prevention programme modifies lower extremity biomechanics during single- and double-leg landing tasks in both the sagittal and frontal plane. It was hypothesized that the training programme would elicit improvements in lower extremity biomechanics, but that these improvements would be greater during a double-leg sagittal plane landing task than tasks performed on a single leg or in the frontal plane. METHODS: Ninety-seven competitive multi-directional sport athletes that competed at the middle- or high-school level were cluster randomized into intervention (n = 48, age = 15.4 ± 1.0 years, height = 1.7 ± 0.07 m, mass = 59.9 ± 11.0 kg) and control (n = 49, age = 15.7 ± 1.6 years, height = 1.7 ± 0.06 m, mass = 60.4 ± 7.7 kg) groups. The intervention group participated in an established 6-week warm-up-based ACL injury prevention programme. Three-dimensional biomechanical analyses of a double- (SAG-DL) and single-leg (SAG-SL) sagittal, and double- (FRONT-DL) and single-leg (FRONT-SL) frontal plane jump landing tasks were tested before and after the intervention. Peak angles, excursions, and external joint moments were analysed for group differences using 2 (group) × 4 (task) repeated measures MANOVA models of delta scores (post-pre-test value) (α < 0.05). RESULTS: Relative to the control group, no significant biomechanical changes were identified in the intervention group for any of the tasks (n.s.). However, a group by task interaction was identified for knee abduction (λ = 0.80, p = 0.02), such that participants in the intervention group showed relative decreases in knee abduction moments during the SAG-DL compared to the SAG-SL (p = 0.005; d = 0.45, CI = 0.04-0.85) task. CONCLUSION: A 6-week warm-up-based ACL injury prevention programme resulted in no significant biomechanical changes during a variety of multi-directional jump landings. Clinically, future prevention programmes should provide a greater training stimulus (intensity, volume), more specificity to tasks associated with the mechanism of ACL injury (single-leg, non-sagittal plane jump landings), and longer programme duration (> 6 weeks) to elicit meaningful biomechanical changes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Authors: Javad Hashemi; Ryan Breighner; Naveen Chandrashekar; Daniel M Hardy; Ajit M Chaudhari; Sandra J Shultz; James R Slauterbeck; Bruce D Beynnon Journal: J Biomech Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Christine D Pollard; Susan M Sigward; Susumu Ota; Karen Langford; Christopher M Powers Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Steven L Dischiavi; Alexis A Wright; Rachel A Heller; Claire E Love; Adam J Salzman; Christian A Harris; Chris M Bleakley Journal: Sports Health Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 4.355