Literature DB >> 26171206

Modified one-day etoposide and cisplatin combination for previously untreated extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective evaluation of 36 cases.

Su-Hee Cho1, Hyun Kuk Kim2, Hang Jea Jang2, Min Jae Park1.   

Abstract

The combination of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) remains one of the standard first-line treatments for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) We devised a one-day modified EP regimen for better tolerance and convenience by modifying the dose and schedule of conventional EP with administration over 3-5 consecutive days. The modified EP consists of two infusions of etoposide (120 mg/m2 each) and 60 mg/m2 of cisplatin on day 1 of a 21-day cycle and a maximum of 6 cycles of treatment. A total of 36 consecutive ED-SCLC patients were treated with the modified EP as first-line therapy and retrospectively reviewed to assess the efficacy and safety of this regimen. Of the 36 patients, 24 exhibited confirmed objective tumor response (overall response rate of 66%, with a complete response rate of 3% and a partial response rate of 63%). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9-15.3] and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months (95% CI: 5.2-9.7). The survival estimates at 1 year were 35 and 17% for OS and PFS, respectively. The chemotherapy treatment was well tolerated, with only one case of grade 4 non-hematological adverse events, no grade 4 hematological toxicities and no treatment-related deaths. The mean relative dose intensity of etoposide and cisplatin was measured to be 94.7 and 98.5% of the planned dose, respectively. Therefore, the modified EP warrants further clinical research regarding its effectiveness, toxicity profile and convenience of administration. Prospective randomized clinical trials are required to determine the therapeutic role of the modified EP as first-line treatment in patients with ED-SCLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemotherapy; cisplatin; etoposide; overall survival; progression-free survival; response rate; small-cell lung cancer

Year:  2015        PMID: 26171206      PMCID: PMC4486878          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2015.556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  19 in total

1.  Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.

Authors:  N Thatcher; D J Girling; P Hopwood; R J Sambrook; W Qian; R J Stephens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Phase III study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wouter K de Jong; Harry J M Groen; Mia G J Koolen; Bonne Biesma; Luuk N A Willems; Hian-Bie Kwa; Aart van Bochove; Harm van Tinteren; Egbert F Smit
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 3.  Etoposide: four decades of development of a topoisomerase II inhibitor.

Authors:  K R Hande
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Topotecan versus observation after cisplatin plus etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: E7593--a phase III trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  J H Schiller; S Adak; D Cella; R F DeVore; D H Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Nasser Hanna; Paul A Bunn; Corey Langer; Lawrence Einhorn; Troy Guthrie; Thaddeus Beck; Rafat Ansari; Peter Ellis; Michael Byrne; Mark Morrison; Subramanian Hariharan; Benjamin Wang; Alan Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kazumasa Noda; Yutaka Nishiwaki; Masaaki Kawahara; Shunichi Negoro; Takahiko Sugiura; Akira Yokoyama; Masahiro Fukuoka; Kiyoshi Mori; Koshiro Watanabe; Tomohide Tamura; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Nagahiro Saijo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Etoposide plus cisplatin with or without the combination of 4'-epidoxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in treatment of extensive small-cell lung cancer: a French Federation of Cancer Institutes multicenter phase III randomized study.

Authors:  J L Pujol; J P Daurès; A Rivière; E Quoix; V Westeel; X Quantin; J L Breton; E Lemarié; M Poudenx; B Milleron; D Moro; D Debieuvre; T Le Chevalier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M L Slevin; P I Clark; S P Joel; S Malik; R J Osborne; W M Gregory; D G Lowe; R H Reznek; P F Wrigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Phase III trial of irinotecan/cisplatin compared with etoposide/cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: clinical and pharmacogenomic results from SWOG S0124.

Authors:  Primo N Lara; Ronald Natale; John Crowley; Heinz Josef Lenz; Mary W Redman; Jane E Carleton; James Jett; Corey J Langer; J Philip Kuebler; Shaker R Dakhil; Kari Chansky; David R Gandara
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.