Tomohiro Yasuda1, Kazuya Fukumura, Haruko Iida, Toshiaki Nakajima. 1. Department of Ischemic Circulatory Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan, yasuda-tomohiro@umin.ac.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The effects on muscle swelling were compared between low-load resistance exercise to exhaustion with (BFR) and without blood flow restriction (NBFR). METHODS:Ten young men [aged 27 (SD 5) years, standing height 1.74 (SD 0.05) m, body mass 70.3 (SD 4.3) kg] performed 20 % of onerepetition maximal dumbbell curl exercise to exhaustion (four sets, rest intervals were 30 s for BFR and/or 3 min for NBFR, respectively). One arm was randomly chosen for BFR exercise and the other arm performed NBFR exercise. During the BFR exercise session, an elastic cuff was worn proximally on the testing arm at 160 mmHg. Electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded from surface electrodes placed on the biceps brachii muscle and analyzed for integrated EMG (iEMG). Biceps brachii muscle thickness (MTH) was measured using B-mode ultrasound. RESULTS: The total number of exercise repetitions was greater (p < 0.01) in NBFR (221 ± 67 reps) than in BFR (111 ± 36 reps). During the exercise session, iEMG for biceps brachii muscles increased (p < 0.01) during BFR and NBFR (3.94 and 4.45 times of baseline value). Immediately after the exercise, MTH sharply increased (p < 0.01) with BFR and NBFR (1.21 and 1.20 times of baseline value). These results demonstrate that both BFR and NBFR exercises lead to pronounced muscle activation and muscle swelling. CONCLUSION: Low-load resistance exercise to exhaustion is an effective method for promoting muscle swelling regardless of BFR. Furthermore, our data indicate that the increase in muscle swelling for both NBFR and BFR is maintained even 60 min after the exercise.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The effects on muscle swelling were compared between low-load resistance exercise to exhaustion with (BFR) and without blood flow restriction (NBFR). METHODS: Ten young men [aged 27 (SD 5) years, standing height 1.74 (SD 0.05) m, body mass 70.3 (SD 4.3) kg] performed 20 % of one repetition maximal dumbbell curl exercise to exhaustion (four sets, rest intervals were 30 s for BFR and/or 3 min for NBFR, respectively). One arm was randomly chosen for BFR exercise and the other arm performed NBFR exercise. During the BFR exercise session, an elastic cuff was worn proximally on the testing arm at 160 mmHg. Electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded from surface electrodes placed on the biceps brachii muscle and analyzed for integrated EMG (iEMG). Biceps brachii muscle thickness (MTH) was measured using B-mode ultrasound. RESULTS: The total number of exercise repetitions was greater (p < 0.01) in NBFR (221 ± 67 reps) than in BFR (111 ± 36 reps). During the exercise session, iEMG for biceps brachii muscles increased (p < 0.01) during BFR and NBFR (3.94 and 4.45 times of baseline value). Immediately after the exercise, MTH sharply increased (p < 0.01) with BFR and NBFR (1.21 and 1.20 times of baseline value). These results demonstrate that both BFR and NBFR exercises lead to pronounced muscle activation and muscle swelling. CONCLUSION: Low-load resistance exercise to exhaustion is an effective method for promoting muscle swelling regardless of BFR. Furthermore, our data indicate that the increase in muscle swelling for both NBFR and BFR is maintained even 60 min after the exercise.
Authors: Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Leigh Breen; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-04-19
Authors: Jeremy P Loenneke; Jacob M Wilson; Pedro J Marín; Michael C Zourdos; Michael G Bemben Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; Brittany R Counts; Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Kevin T Mattocks; Gilberto C Laurentino; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke Journal: J Physiol Sci Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 2.781
Authors: Daniel S Lorenz; Lane Bailey; Kevin E Wilk; Robert E Mangine; Paul Head; Terry L Grindstaff; Scot Morrison Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 3.824
Authors: Bryan Haddock; Sofie K Hansen; Ulrich Lindberg; Jakob Lindberg Nielsen; Ulrik Frandsen; Per Aagaard; Henrik B W Larsson; Charlotte Suetta Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2020-08-27
Authors: Mikhail Santos Cerqueira; Daniel Germano Maciel; Jean Artur Mendonça Barboza; Christoph Centner; Maria Lira; Rafael Pereira; Wouber Hérickson De Brito Vieira Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 3.824
Authors: Michael J Ilett; Timo Rantalainen; Michelle A Keske; Anthony K May; Stuart A Warmington Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Michal Wilk; Mariola Gepfert; Michal Krzysztofik; Petr Stastny; Adam Zajac; Gregory C Bogdanis Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Mathias Wernbom; Brad J Schoenfeld; Gøran Paulsen; Thomas Bjørnsen; Kristoffer T Cumming; Per Aagaard; Brian C Clark; Truls Raastad Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Jamie F Burr; Luke Hughes; Stuart Warmington; Brendan R Scott; Johnny Owens; Takashi Abe; Jakob L Nielsen; Cleiton Augusto Libardi; Gilberto Laurentino; Gabriel Rodrigues Neto; Christopher Brandner; Juan Martin-Hernandez; Jeremy Loenneke; Stephen D Patterson Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 4.566