Literature DB >> 25490552

Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence.

Lu Lin1, Hyo-Won Ahn, Su-Jung Kim, Sung-Chul Moon, Seong-Hun Kim, Gerald Nelson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immediate effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on the transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes with bone-borne (C-expander) and tooth-borne type expanders using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in late adolescents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 28 female late-adolescent patients was divided into two groups according to the type of expander: bone-borne (C-expander, n  =  15, age  =  18.1 ± 4.4 years) and tooth-borne (hyrax, bands on premolars and molars, n  =  13, age  =  17.4 ± 3.4 years). CBCT scans were taken at 0.2-mm voxel size before treatment (T1) and 3 months after RME (T2). Transverse skeletal and dental expansion, alveolar inclination, tooth axis, vertical height of tooth, and buccal dehiscence were evaluated on maxillary premolars and molars. Paired t-test, independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Scheffé post hoc analysis were performed.
RESULTS: The C-expander group produced greater skeletal expansion, except in the region of the first premolar (P < .05 or < .01), which showed slight buccal tipping of the alveolar bone. The Hyrax group had more buccal tipping of the alveolar bone and the tooth axes, except in the region of the second molar (P < .05 or < .01 or < .001). Dental expansion at the apex level was similar in the banded teeth (the first premolar and the first molar). Vertical height changes were apparent on the second premolar in the hyrax group (P < .05 or < .01). Significant buccal dehiscence occurred at the first premolar in the hyrax group (P < .01 or < .001). There were no significant differences between tooth types for any variables in the C-expander group.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients in late adolescence, bone-borne expanders produced greater orthopedic effects and fewer dentoalveolar side effects compared to the hyrax expanders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar bone; Bone-borne expander; C-implant; Cone-beam computed tomogram; Hyrax expander; Rapid maxillary expansion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25490552     DOI: 10.2319/030514-156.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  49 in total

1.  Differential treatment effects of two anchorage systems for rapid maxillary expansion: a retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Björn Ludwig; Julia Spindler; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Retrospective CBCT analysis of airway volume changes after bone-borne vs tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Golnaz Kavand; Manuel Lagravère; Katherine Kula; Kelton Stewart; Ahmed Ghoneima
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Assessment of respiratory muscle strength and airflow before and after microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion.

Authors:  Camilla Juliana Storto; Aguinaldo Silva Garcez; Hideo Suzuki; Karla Garcez Cusmanich; Islam Elkenawy; Won Moon; Selly Sayuri Suzuki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Orthopedic outcomes of hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders.

Authors:  Daniela Garib; Felicia Miranda; Juan Martin Palomo; Fernando Pugliese; José Carlos da Cunha Bastos; Alexandre Magno Dos Santos; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Evaluation of factors related to the success of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion.

Authors:  Cibele B Oliveira; Priscila Ayub; Fernanda Angelieri; Wilson H Murata; Selly S Suzuki; Dirceu B Ravelli; Ary Santos-Pinto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Influence of different types of rapid maxillary expansion on root resorption: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kai Xia; Wen-Tian Sun; Li-Yuan Yu; Jun Liu
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2021-02-01

7.  Alveolar bone response to maxillary incisor retraction using stable skeletal structures as a reference.

Authors:  Teerapat Eksriwong; Udom Thongudomporn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Evaluation of miniscrew-supported rapid maxillary expansion in adolescents: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tugce Celenk-Koca; Aslihan Ertan Erdinc; Serpil Hazar; Lacey Harris; Jeryl D English; Sercan Akyalcin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Transverse dentoalveolar response of mandibular arch after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) with tooth-borne and bone-borne appliances.

Authors:  Antonino Lo Giudice; Vincenzo Ronsivalle; Manuel Lagravere; Rosalia Leonardi; Stefano Martina; Gaetano Isola
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Molar inclination and surrounding alveolar bone change relative to the design of bone-borne maxillary expanders: A CBCT study.

Authors:  Hyung-Wook Moon; Min-Jung Kim; Hyo-Won Ahn; Su-Jung Kim; Seong-Hun Kim; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.