Mitesh S Patel1, Kevin G Volpp1, Dylan S Small2, Alexander S Hill3, Orit Even-Shoshan4, Lisa Rosenbaum5, Richard N Ross3, Lisa Bellini6, Jingsan Zhu7, Jeffrey H Silber8. 1. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Administration Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania2Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia3Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton S. 2. The Leonard Davis Institute, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia6Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 3. Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania8Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 5. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 7. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia4The Leonard Davis Institute, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 8. Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia7Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania8Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Patient outcomes associated with the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty hour reforms have not been evaluated at a national level. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of the 2011 ACGME duty hour reforms with mortality and readmissions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study of Medicare patient admissions (6,384,273 admissions from 2,790,356 patients) to short-term, acute care, nonfederal hospitals (n = 3104) with principal medical diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, or congestive heart failure or a Diagnosis Related Group classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery. Of the hospitals, 96 (3.1%) were very major teaching, 138 (4.4%) major teaching, 442 (14.2%) minor teaching, 443 (14.3%) very minor teaching, and 1985 (64.0%) nonteaching. EXPOSURE: Resident-to-bed ratio as a continuous measure of hospital teaching intensity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in 30-day all-location mortality and 30-day all-cause readmission, comparing patients in more intensive relative to less intensive teaching hospitals before (July 1, 2009-June 30, 2011) and after (July 1, 2011-June 30, 2012) duty hour reforms, adjusting for patient comorbidities, time trends, and hospital site. RESULTS: In the 2 years before duty hour reforms, there were 4,325,854 admissions with 288,422 deaths and 602,380 readmissions. In the first year after the reforms, accounting for teaching hospital intensity, there were 2,058,419 admissions with 133,547 deaths and 272,938 readmissions. There were no significant postreform differences in mortality accounting for teaching hospital intensity for combined medical conditions (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.03), combined surgical categories (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04), or any of the individual medical conditions or surgical categories. There were no significant postreform differences in readmissions for combined medical conditions (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02) or combined surgical categories (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.03). For the medical condition of stroke, there were higher odds of readmissions in the postreform period (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.001-1.13). However, this finding was not supported by sensitivity analyses and there were no significant postreform differences for readmissions for any other individual medical condition or surgical category. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among Medicare beneficiaries, there were no significant differences in the change in 30-day mortality rates or 30-day all-cause readmission rates for those hospitalized in more intensive relative to less intensive teaching hospitals in the year after implementation of the 2011 ACGME duty hour reforms compared with those hospitalized in the 2 years before implementation.
IMPORTANCE: Patient outcomes associated with the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty hour reforms have not been evaluated at a national level. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of the 2011 ACGME duty hour reforms with mortality and readmissions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study of Medicare patient admissions (6,384,273 admissions from 2,790,356 patients) to short-term, acute care, nonfederal hospitals (n = 3104) with principal medical diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, or congestive heart failure or a Diagnosis Related Group classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery. Of the hospitals, 96 (3.1%) were very major teaching, 138 (4.4%) major teaching, 442 (14.2%) minor teaching, 443 (14.3%) very minor teaching, and 1985 (64.0%) nonteaching. EXPOSURE: Resident-to-bed ratio as a continuous measure of hospital teaching intensity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in 30-day all-location mortality and 30-day all-cause readmission, comparing patients in more intensive relative to less intensive teaching hospitals before (July 1, 2009-June 30, 2011) and after (July 1, 2011-June 30, 2012) duty hour reforms, adjusting for patient comorbidities, time trends, and hospital site. RESULTS: In the 2 years before duty hour reforms, there were 4,325,854 admissions with 288,422 deaths and 602,380 readmissions. In the first year after the reforms, accounting for teaching hospital intensity, there were 2,058,419 admissions with 133,547 deaths and 272,938 readmissions. There were no significant postreform differences in mortality accounting for teaching hospital intensity for combined medical conditions (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.03), combined surgical categories (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04), or any of the individual medical conditions or surgical categories. There were no significant postreform differences in readmissions for combined medical conditions (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02) or combined surgical categories (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.03). For the medical condition of stroke, there were higher odds of readmissions in the postreform period (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.001-1.13). However, this finding was not supported by sensitivity analyses and there were no significant postreform differences for readmissions for any other individual medical condition or surgical category. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among Medicare beneficiaries, there were no significant differences in the change in 30-day mortality rates or 30-day all-cause readmission rates for those hospitalized in more intensive relative to less intensive teaching hospitals in the year after implementation of the 2011 ACGME duty hour reforms compared with those hospitalized in the 2 years before implementation.
Authors: Judy A Shea; Lisa L Willett; Karen R Borman; Kamal M F Itani; Furman S McDonald; Stephanie A Call; Saima Chaudhry; Michael Adams; Karen M Chacko; Kevin G Volpp; Vineet M Arora Journal: Acad Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: J J Allison; C I Kiefe; N W Weissman; S D Person; M Rousculp; J G Canto; S Bae; O D Williams; R Farmer; R M Centor Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-09-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Srijan Sen; Henry R Kranzler; Aashish K Didwania; Ann C Schwartz; Sudha Amarnath; Joseph C Kolars; Gregory W Dalack; Breck Nichols; Constance Guille Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: E B Keeler; L V Rubenstein; K L Kahn; D Draper; E R Harrison; M J McGinty; W H Rogers; R H Brook Journal: JAMA Date: 1992-10-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kevin G Volpp; Dylan S Small; Patrick S Romano; Kamal M F Itani; Amy K Rosen; Orit Even-Shoshan; Yanli Wang; Lisa Bellini; Michael J Halenar; Sophia Korovaichuk; Jingsan Zhu; Jeffrey H Silber Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Christopher P Scally; Gurjit Sandhu; Christopher Magas; Paul G Gauger; Rebecca M Minter Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Alex Ganetsky; Todd A Miano; Mitchell E Hughes; Robert H Vonderheide; David L Porter; Ran Reshef Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Terri Blackwell; Dana R Kriesel; Eric Vittinghoff; Conor S O'Brien; Jason P Sullivan; Natalie C Viyaran; Shadab A Rahman; Steven W Lockley; Laura K Barger; Ann C Halbower; Sue E Poynter; Kenneth P Wright; Pearl L Yu; Phyllis C Zee; Christopher P Landrigan; Charles A Czeisler; Katie L Stone Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Matthew D Weaver; Christopher P Landrigan; Jason P Sullivan; Conor S O'Brien; Salim Qadri; Natalie Viyaran; Wei Wang; Céline Vetter; Charles A Czeisler; Laura K Barger Journal: Am J Med Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Sanjay V Desai; David A Asch; Lisa M Bellini; Krisda H Chaiyachati; Manqing Liu; Alice L Sternberg; James Tonascia; Alyssa M Yeager; Jeremy M Asch; Joel T Katz; Mathias Basner; David W Bates; Karl Y Bilimoria; David F Dinges; Orit Even-Shoshan; David M Shade; Jeffrey H Silber; Dylan S Small; Kevin G Volpp; Judy A Shea Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 91.245