STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the appropriateness of diagnostic coding of acute myocardial infarction across teaching and nonteaching hospitals. DESIGN: Retrospective review of a random sample of medical records to find evidence of the occurrence and active treatment of acute myocardial infarction during the admission. SETTING: Five tertiary teaching, five other teaching, and five nonteaching hospitals in metropolitan Boston. CASES: Random sample of hospital admissions assigned a discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction between October 1984 and September 1985. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1003 cases reviewed, 260 did not meet the clinical criteria for acute myocardial infarction. At tertiary hospitals, 175 (41.7%) failed to qualify, compared with 25 (9.1%) at nonteaching facilities. In a large fraction of the disqualified cases, the patients had been admitted to exclude the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction; although explicitly "ruled out," an acute myocardial infarction code was assigned. Sixty-six cases from teaching hospitals did not qualify because the patient had been admitted only for coronary angiography after an uneventful postmyocardial infarction course. Almost one-third of these patients had had their infarcts from 5 to 8 weeks before the angiography admission. CONCLUSIONS: Cases with an inappropriate discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction may be concentrated in teaching hospitals. This finding could have implications for Medicare's diagnosis-related group payment system and governmental and other research efforts that use these data for such purposes as drawing inferences about the quality of hospital care.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the appropriateness of diagnostic coding of acute myocardial infarction across teaching and nonteaching hospitals. DESIGN: Retrospective review of a random sample of medical records to find evidence of the occurrence and active treatment of acute myocardial infarction during the admission. SETTING: Five tertiary teaching, five other teaching, and five nonteaching hospitals in metropolitan Boston. CASES: Random sample of hospital admissions assigned a discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction between October 1984 and September 1985. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1003 cases reviewed, 260 did not meet the clinical criteria for acute myocardial infarction. At tertiary hospitals, 175 (41.7%) failed to qualify, compared with 25 (9.1%) at nonteaching facilities. In a large fraction of the disqualified cases, the patients had been admitted to exclude the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction; although explicitly "ruled out," an acute myocardial infarction code was assigned. Sixty-six cases from teaching hospitals did not qualify because the patient had been admitted only for coronary angiography after an uneventful postmyocardial infarction course. Almost one-third of these patients had had their infarcts from 5 to 8 weeks before the angiography admission. CONCLUSIONS: Cases with an inappropriate discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction may be concentrated in teaching hospitals. This finding could have implications for Medicare's diagnosis-related group payment system and governmental and other research efforts that use these data for such purposes as drawing inferences about the quality of hospital care.
Authors: Kevin Beier; Sabitha Eppanapally; Heidi S Bazick; Domingo Chang; Karthik Mahadevappa; Fiona K Gibbons; Kenneth B Christopher Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: E S Fisher; F S Whaley; W M Krushat; D J Malenka; C Fleming; J A Baron; D C Hsia Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1992-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ken S Woo; William A Ghali; Danielle A Southern; Jack V Tu; Gerry Parsons; Michelle M Graham Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Hude Quan; Bing Li; L Duncan Saunders; Gerry A Parsons; Carolyn I Nilsson; Arif Alibhai; William A Ghali Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Mitesh S Patel; Kevin G Volpp; Dylan S Small; Alexander S Hill; Orit Even-Shoshan; Lisa Rosenbaum; Richard N Ross; Lisa Bellini; Jingsan Zhu; Jeffrey H Silber Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 56.272