Lysine methylation of histone H3 and H4 has been identified as a promising therapeutic target in treating various cellular diseases. The availability of an in vivo assay that enables rapid screening and preclinical evaluation of drugs that potentially target this cellular process will significantly expedite the pace of drug development. This study is the first to report the development of a real-time molecular imaging biosensor (a fusion protein, [FLuc2]-[Suv39h1]-[(G4S)3]-[H3-K9]-[cODC]) that can detect and monitor the methylation status of a specific histone lysine methylation mark (H3-K9) in live animals. The sensitivity of this sensor was assessed in various cell lines, in response to down-regulation of methyltransferase EHMT2 by specific siRNA, and in nude mice with lysine replacement mutants. In vivo imaging in response to a combination of methyltransferase inhibitors BIX01294 and Chaetocin in mice reveals the potential of this sensor for preclinical drug evaluation. This biosensor thus has demonstrated its utility in the detection of H3-K9 methylations in vivo and potential value in preclinical drug development.
Lysine methylation of histone H3 and H4 has been identified as a promising therapeutic target in treating various cellular diseases. The availability of an in vivo assay that enables rapid screening and preclinical evaluation of drugs that potentially target this cellular process will significantly expedite the pace of drug development. This study is the first to report the development of a real-time molecular imaging biosensor (a fusion protein, [FLuc2]-[Suv39h1]-[(G4S)3]-[H3-K9]-[cODC]) that can detect and monitor the methylation status of a specific histone lysine methylation mark (H3-K9) in live animals. The sensitivity of this sensor was assessed in various cell lines, in response to down-regulation of methyltransferase EHMT2 by specific siRNA, and in nude mice with lysine replacement mutants. In vivo imaging in response to a combination of methyltransferase inhibitors BIX01294 and Chaetocin in mice reveals the potential of this sensor for preclinical drug evaluation. This biosensor thus has demonstrated its utility in the detection of H3-K9 methylations in vivo and potential value in preclinical drug development.
Histone methylation
is an important
post-translational modification (PTM) that governs chromosome organization
and gene regulation in cells. It has been implicated in a spectrum
of diseases, such as cancers, intellectual disorders [e.g., fragile
X-syndrome (FXS), schizophrenia, depression], neurodegenerative disorders
[e.g., Alzheimer’s disease and Huntington’s disease,[1] heart failure,[2] rheumatoid
arthritis (RA),[3] and multiple sclerosis],[4] and aging, and in fact almost all major human
disorders. Histone lysine methylation, in particular, has been identified
as a “watchdog” that controls the growth and metabolic
function of cells in various physiological states. Histone lysine
methylation therefore provides promising therapeutic targets due to
its regulatory role, and consequently there is significant interest
in developing methodologies to screen novel small-molecule drugs capable
of modulating this process.Histone lysine methylation mainly
occurs in the N-terminal tail
region of histones H3 and H4 in mammalian cells. The collective action
of methylation marks along with other epigenetic processes, in particular
DNA methylation, controls gene expression and regulates cellular processes.
The heterochromatin complex is a region of DNA rich in genes that
are silenced via histone methylations. Silenced genes can become transcriptionally
active in response to external signaling stimuli.[5] Di- or trimethylations of the H3-K9 mark are prominent
post-translational modifications mostly associated with transcriptionally
repressive heterochromatin complex and are the main processes involved
in X-chromosome inactivation.[6] The interaction
of methylated H3-K9 with heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) is essential
for the formation of heterochromatin complexes, which in turn are
the essential components for maintaining DNA integrity.[7]Histone methylations are reversible, and
demethylation reactions
catalyzed by specific demethylase enzymes are crucial for the reactivation
of genes that were previously silenced.[8] Methylation and demethylation reactions at specific histone lysine
methylation marks, regulated by a combination of specific methyltransferases
and demethylases, are capable of regulating the expression levels
of different proteins involved in controlling cellular homeostasis.[9] Therefore, manipulation of gene expression is
possible by tuning specific histone methylation marks positioned within
H3 and/or H4 histone proteins. Histone H3 has five important lysine
methylation marks (H3-K4, H3-K9, H3-K27, H3-K36, and H3-K79) that
control chromatin organization and the regulation of gene expression.
H4-K20 is the only histone methylation mark identified in histone
H4 to date. These methylation marks collectively modulate the transcriptionally
active or repressive states of the chromatin complex. H3-K4, H3-K9,
and H3-K27 are important methylation marks involved in controlling
the expression of key proteins that maintain the pluripotency of embryonic
stem cells; for instance, hypermethylation of H3-K4 occurs at the nanog gene locus in embryonic stem cells, whereas H3-K4
demethylation occurs at the same gene locus in trophoblast stem cells.[10]Degrons are proteasomal recognition sequences
present in many proteins
that are recognized by the proteasome and thus can direct protein
degradation. They are called N- or C-terminal degrons based on their
presence on either the N-terminal or C-terminal region of proteins.
The C-terminal degron of mouseornithine decarboxylase (cODC) is a
well-studied degron; it induces proteasomal degradation independent
of polyubiquitylation. The cODC degron has been utilized for the selective
protein degradation of green fluorescent protein (GFP), Ura3 proteins,[11] and several other cellular proteins, including
TRAF6 and Rb in experimental research.[12] Additionally, by using the cODC degron, molecular sensors were developed
to image the effect of therapeutic radiation-induced cellular 26S
proteasome functions[13] and also to track
cancer initiating cells (CICs) in vivo.[14] Full-length mouseODC has previously been incorporated
at the C-terminal end of green fluorescent protein (GFP)[15] and used for the indirect imaging of cellular
protease levels (by measuring the GFP signal). In addition, N-terminal
degrons have been used to design sensors for imaging apoptosis, cell
death, and cell growth arrest.[16]The histone methylation status of cultured cells and tissue samples
has been routinely detected by various antibody-based assay methods
and a few modern spectroscopic assays. Besides these conventional
assays, antibody-based strip biosensors have been recently developed
to detect histone lysine methylation at specific marks.[17,18] Collectively, aside from the fluorescence-resonance-energy-transfer
(FRET) method developed by Lin et al.,[19] all methods reported thus far rely mainly on antibodies that specifically
bind to methylated histone proteins. The FRET sensor developed by
Lin et al. has demonstrable value in the detection of H3-K9 methylation
in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. However, despite the fact that this
FRET sensor is able to measure histone methylation effectively, the
application of this assay is limited to detection of the histone methylation
status in live cells and cannot be used for the real-time in vivo monitoring in live animals. To address this issue,
we, for the first time, developed a bioluminescence-based molecular
biosensor that enables optical bioluminescence imaging of histone
methylation status in cell lysates, in intact cells, and in living
animals. We adopted the “degron protease blockade” as a concept to design our sensor (H3-K9 sensor). To examine
the specificity of the H3-K9 methylation sensor, we designed mutant
sensors by replacing lysine 9 (K9) with leucine (K9L). Additionally,
a sensor protein with mutant Suv39h1 chromodomain was also generated
using tryptophan to alanine (W45A) mutation. Our results demonstrate
that the developed sensor is robust and sensitive to image H3-K9 methylation
in intact cells and in living animals.
Results and Discussion
Novel
Design of H3-K9 Degron Protease Blockade Methylation Sensor
The methylation sensor was designed by combining codon-optimized
firefly luciferase (FLuc2), the chromodomain of methyltransferase
(Suv39h1: amino acid 42–91), a 15 amino acid linker peptide
[(G4S)3], the first 13 amino acids of the H3
protein (H3-K9: ARTKQTARKSTGG), and the C-terminal 37
amino acid degron of mouseornithine decarboxylase (cODC). The order
of domains from the NH2 to the COOH terminal are as follows:
[FLuc2]-[Suv39h1]-[(G4S)3]-[H3-K9]-[cODC-Degron].
The H3-L4, H3-L9, and H3-L4L9 mutant sensors were constructed by replacing
lysine (K) at methylation marks K9 and K4 of the H3-K9 peptide with
leucine (L) (Supporting Information Figure 1). The sensor fusion proteins were expressed under a constitutive
CMV promoter in the pcDNA 3.1 (+) vector backbone.MouseODC
is the first rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine biosynthetic pathway.
In this pathway, polyamines, using a feedback mechanism, promote the
degradation of mouseODC by inducing antizyme. Antizyme, in turn,
favors an interaction between 26S proteasome and the C-terminal degron
of mouseODC.[20] Moreover, there are no
reports to date that show that degron-proteasomal degradation can
be blocked by conformational change mediated by site-specific epigenetic
modifications, which occurs within the protein. The present study
attempts to evaluate the consequence of interaction between Suv39h1
and the H3-K9 methylation mark. The chromodomain of Suv39h1 specifically
interacts with the di- and trimethylated K9 mark of H3 protein. Therefore,
the Suv39h1-chromodomain of the sensor interacts with the H3-K9 methylation
mark present within the 13 amino acid peptide when it is in the methylated
state, resulting in a conformation lock that blocks degron-mediated
protein degradation. By contrast, the H3-L9 mutant sensor has an open
conformation due to the absence of the [Suv39h1]-[H3-K9] methylation
lock (Figure 1). This provides degron access
for proteasomal complex, resulting in degradation of the sensor fusion
protein by the proteasomal complex, which in turn leads to little
or no bioluminescence signal.
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the design of degron-protease-blockade
histone methylation imaging sensor. The scheme shows the outcome of
H3-K9 and its respective mutant (H3-L9) sensor upon methylation by
methyltransferase enzymes and in response to the treatment of methyltransferase
inhibitors. The sensor is a fusion protein in which a full-length
firefly luciferase is fused to H3-K9 peptide, a 15-amino acid linker,
Suv39h1-chromodomain, and a 37 amino acid degron protease recognition
sequence at the COOH terminal. Upon methylation of the H3-K9 peptide
by methyltransferase, the inbuilt Suv39h1 chromodomain is recruited,
and this creates a conformational lock that blocks degron-mediated
proteasomal degradation of the H3-K9 sensor fusion protein; as a result,
intact FLuc protein is accumulated in the cells. By contrast, when
histone methyltransferase inhibitors block methylation of the H3-K9
sensor and thereby pave the way for degron-mediated proteasomal degradation
of sensor protein, resulting in the loss of FLuc signal. The H3-L9
sensor, which lacks K9 for methylation, undergoes constitutive proteasomal
degradation due to the lack of H3-K9–Suv39h1 conformational
lock and eventually shows little or no FLuc signal.
Schematic illustration of the design of degron-protease-blockade
histone methylation imaging sensor. The scheme shows the outcome of
H3-K9 and its respective mutant (H3-L9) sensor upon methylation by
methyltransferase enzymes and in response to the treatment of methyltransferase
inhibitors. The sensor is a fusion protein in which a full-length
firefly luciferase is fused to H3-K9 peptide, a 15-amino acid linker,
Suv39h1-chromodomain, and a 37 amino acid degron protease recognition
sequence at the COOH terminal. Upon methylation of the H3-K9 peptide
by methyltransferase, the inbuilt Suv39h1 chromodomain is recruited,
and this creates a conformational lock that blocks degron-mediated
proteasomal degradation of the H3-K9 sensor fusion protein; as a result,
intact FLuc protein is accumulated in the cells. By contrast, when
histone methyltransferase inhibitors block methylation of the H3-K9
sensor and thereby pave the way for degron-mediated proteasomal degradation
of sensor protein, resulting in the loss of FLuc signal. The H3-L9
sensor, which lacks K9 for methylation, undergoes constitutive proteasomal
degradation due to the lack of H3-K9–Suv39h1 conformational
lock and eventually shows little or no FLuc signal.
Degron-Protease-Blockade Sensor Measures
H3-K9 Histone Methylation
in Cells
There are six lysine methylation marks [H3-K4, H3-K9,
H3-K27, H3-K36, H3-K79, and H4-K20] that have been identified within
the core histones H3 and H4, which are important for controlling gene
expression, and therefore are implicated in diseases like cancer.
These six histone lysine methylation marks are thus considered promising
therapeutic targets. The lysine molecules located within H3 and H4
are mono-, di-, and tri- methylated by specific methyltransferase
enzymes and demethylated by another group of enzymes called demethylases
that have only been recently discovered.[8] Most of the current generation drugs targeting histone lysine methylations
are designed to inhibit or activate methyltransferase enzymes, rather
than directly block or stabilize methylation levels at specific histone
lysine methylation marks. Although many drugs are already being screened,
their efficacy cannot be ascertained to the fullest extent due to
a shortage of histone lysine methylation detection and evaluation
methods. To fill these gaps, we developed a real-time methylation-detection
optical-imaging biosensor that utilizes a specific interaction between
the chromodomain of Suv39h1-histone-lysine N-methyltransferase
enzyme and H3-K9 methylation mark.Hepatocellular carcinoma
is a primary liver cancer in human, and it has been implicated with
deregulation of histone modifications. Epigenetic modifications play
a vital role in tumor development, progression, and metastasis. Since
this study aims to develop a methylation-imaging sensor with the potential
to screen small molecule modulators of histone methylation, we chose
HepG2 cells as a primary model for our preliminary evaluation and
characterization of degron blockade histone methylation sensor. The
suitability of the methylation sensor was initially tested by optical
bioluminescence imaging in transfected intact HepG2 cells. Plasmid
vectors expressing wild-type (H3-K9) and mutant (H3-L9) methylation
sensors were transfected into HepG2 cells after an initial plating
of 70 to 80% confluency. H3-K9 methylation mediated firefly luciferase
(FLuc) signals were captured at 24 and 48 h post-transfection by 20
min of sequentially imaging with a cooled CCD camera (IVIS), starting
immediately after the addition of 50 μg/mL of substrate d-luciferin in PBS. A methylation-specific FLuc signal of 2.5
× 108 ± 4.1 × 107 p/s/cm2/sr was obtained with the wild-type methylation sensor (H3-K9),
which is 5.7 ± 0.22 fold higher than what was observed with the
K4 mutant (H3-L4) sensor (4.4 × 107 ± 1.6 ×
106 p/sec/cm2/sr), and 11.8 ± 1.1 fold
higher than the signal obtained with the K9 mutant (H3-L9) sensor
(2.1 × 107 ± 1.4 × 106 p/s/cm2/sr; Figure 2A).
Figure 2
(A) Optical imaging of
the degron-protease-blockade histone methylation
imaging sensor: (A) Graph showing normalized firefly luciferase signal
measured from HepG2-cells transfected with plasmids expressing H3-K9,
H3-L4, and H3-L9 degron protease blockade histone methylation sensors.
The cells cotransfected with Renilla luciferase expression vector
were used for transfection normalization. The samples are in the order
as they appear in the x-axis labels. Data are mean
± standard error mean of three determinants (*p < 0.03). (B) RT-PCR shows the mRNA level of H3-K9, H3-L4, and
H3-L9 degron blockade histone methylation sensors, and the graph shows
normalized pixel values of DNA bands. (C) Immunoblot shows the level
of H3-K9, H3-L4, and H3-L9 degron blockade histone methylation sensors
detected with FLuc specific antibody. The lower panel shows the GAPDH
protein level, and the graph shows normalized pixel values of sensor
protein bands. The experiments were repeated at least a minimum of
three times.
(A) Optical imaging of
the degron-protease-blockade histone methylation
imaging sensor: (A) Graph showing normalized firefly luciferase signal
measured from HepG2-cells transfected with plasmids expressing H3-K9,
H3-L4, and H3-L9 degron protease blockade histone methylation sensors.
The cells cotransfected with Renilla luciferase expression vector
were used for transfection normalization. The samples are in the order
as they appear in the x-axis labels. Data are mean
± standard error mean of three determinants (*p < 0.03). (B) RT-PCR shows the mRNA level of H3-K9, H3-L4, and
H3-L9 degron blockade histone methylation sensors, and the graph shows
normalized pixel values of DNA bands. (C) Immunoblot shows the level
of H3-K9, H3-L4, and H3-L9 degron blockade histone methylation sensors
detected with FLuc specific antibody. The lower panel shows the GAPDH
protein level, and the graph shows normalized pixel values of sensor
protein bands. The experiments were repeated at least a minimum of
three times.In order to demonstrate
that the luciferase signal generation was
due to the methylation-mediated protease blockade, we conducted RT-PCR
and immunoblot analysis in transfected cells. Immunoblot was performed
on lysates obtained from transfected cells using a FLuc-specific monoclonal
antibody. The levels of each sensor protein, detected upon immunoblot
analysis, were correlated with the luciferase signal obtained from
the respective sensor, whereas the mRNA levels of all three sensors
remained the same (Figure 2B,C). This indicates
that the wild-type sensor is resistant to proteolytic cleavage due
to a methylation-mediated conformational blockade that disables recognition
of the degron sequence by the proteasome, whereas mutant sensors with
a flexible open conformation remain susceptible to proteolytic cleavage.
To evaluate specificity, we also constructed methylation sensors with
a tryptophan to alanine (W45A) mutation in the Suv39h1 chromodomain
in both the H3-K9 sensor and the H3-L9 sensor. Both were evaluated
in transfected HepG2 cells. A significant drop in luciferase signal
(p < 0.01) was observed in cells expressing either
the sensor protein containing mutant chromodomain or mutations in
both the chromodomain and interaction domain, in comparison to cells
expressing the wild-type counterparts (Supporting
Information Figure 2A).
Degron-Protease-Blockade
Sensor Expressed with Nuclear Localization
Signal (NLS) Sequence
Because histone methylation is a nuclear
event, we tested whether additional NLS, in addition to the inherent
NLS located in the chromodomain of the sensor, is needed in localizing
the sensor to the nucleus and enhancing methylation signal. We tested
the methylation-mediated bioluminescence signal by introducing NLS
at the C-terminus of the sensor fusion protein. Moreover, the addition
of NLS signal peptide downstream from degron allowed us to test whether
the NLS sequence has any impact on the recognition of degron sequence
by protease in the degradation process. The degron-protease-blockade-methylation
sensor with NLS in the C-terminal end was tested in HepG2 cells. The
luciferase signals measured in HepG2 cells, which were transfected
with methylation sensors with or without NLS sequence, showed that
the addition of NLS sequence at the C-terminal end of the degron-protease-methylation
sensor did not have any significant effect on the observed bioluminescence
signal (Supporting Information Figure 2B), and the fold variation between the wild-type and the mutant sensors,
with or without NLS, remained unchanged. The H3-K9 sensor with the
NLS tag yielded a luciferase signal of 3.35 × 107 ±
3.06 × 106 RLU/μg protein, whereas the H3-K9
sensor with no NLS tag gave a luciferase signal of 3.32 × 107 ± 3.02 × 106 RLU/μg protein. These
results clearly demonstrate that the chromodomain of Suv39h1 and the
first 13 amino acids of H3 proteins, which harbor inherent nuclear
localization signals, are sufficient to localize the methylation sensors
to the nucleus, facilitating methyltransferase enzyme action.
Mutant-FRB
(FRB*) In a Degron Mimetic to Modulate Histone Methylation
Sensor by Rapamycin
As an attempt to modulate histone methylation-mediated
bioluminescent signal by our protease blockade sensor, we constructed
a methylation sensor that contained a triple mutant form of FKBP12
rapamycin binding protein (FRB*) in place of the cODC degron as a
degron mimetic. This FRB-triple mutant (K2095P, T2098L, and W2101F)
has previously been used as a protein degradation initiator, including
glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3β), glutathione S-transferase
(GST), and firefly luciferase;[21,22] therefore its addition
to the C-terminal end of the unmethylated sensor was expected to degrade
the fusion protein. The binding of rapamycin to FRB* alters the conformational
switch and can prevent the recognition of FRB* by a protease independent
of methylation blockade. Hence, this system can be modulated in two
ways. We imaged the wild-type and mutant sensors constructed with
the FRB* sequence in HepG2 cells before and after modulation with
rapamycin. The results showed a significant increase (p = 0.0002) in bioluminescent signal when cells expressing the H3-K9
sensor were treated with 40 nM of rapamycin. However, there was no
change in the bioluminescence signal measured in cells expressing
the mutant sensor (H3-L9) with or without the addition of rapamycin.
Immunoblot analysis of cell lysates obtained from HepG2 cells transfected
with either wild-type or mutant sensors, with or without rapamycin
treatment, demonstrated a good correlation between sensor protein
levels and the luciferase signal measured using optical imaging (Supporting Information Figure 3A–C). These
results show that sensors containing the FRB* degron sequence are
less efficient than those containing the cODC degron sequence in terms
of protease recognition.
The Degron-Protease-Blockade Sensor Is Capable
of Measuring
H3-K9Methylation in Different Cells
The ability of the H3-K9
degron-protease-blockade-methylation sensor to detect histone lysine
methylations was evaluated not only in HepG2 cells but also in MDA-MB231,
HEK293T, and MCF7 cells, in order to determine the generalizability
of the sensor in various types of cells. The cells transfected with
the H3-K9 methylation sensor showed significantly higher levels of
luciferase signal (HepG2: 2.5 × 108 ± 2.3 ×
107 p/s/cm2/sr; MDA-MB231: 8.38 × 106 ± 2.1 × 106 p/s/cm2/sr; HEK293T:
8.2 × 107 ± 2.7 × 107 p/s/cm2/sr; MC7: 7.1 × 107 ± 6.1 × 106 p/s/cm2/sr) compared to mutant sensors (H3-L9
and H3-L4L9) in all four cell lines. The fold variation of luciferase
signals between wild-type and K9 mutant (H3-L9) sensors in HepG2,
MDA-MB231, HEK293T, and MCF7 cells were 5.7, 4.29, 6.65, and 9.22,
respectively, whereas signal fold variations between the wild-type
and double mutant sensors (H3-L4L9) were 11.85, 50.96, 11.73, and
35.78, respectively (Supporting Information Figure
4A–D). The expression level of endogenous methyltransferase
EHMT2, which is predominantly responsible for the methylation of the
H3-K9 peptide, was tested using immunoblot to correlate the sensor
signal. The levels of EHMT2 methyltransferase protein observed in
these cells correlated with methylation-mediated luciferase signals
recorded (Supporting Information Figure 5A–C). However, luciferase signals measured in HepG2 cells were higher
than the EHMT2 protein level detected in these cells, which suggests
the presence of other methyltransferase enzymes capable of catalyzing
the H3-K9 methylation mark.[23] These results
clearly demonstrate that the degron-blockade-methylation sensor is
sufficiently generalizable, specific, and sensitive to image H3-K9
methylation in different cell types, and while the absolute level
of signal varies among cell lines, the fold changes between the wild-type
and the mutant sensors remain consistent across different cell lines.
The Degron-Protease-Blockade Sensor Measures H3-K9Methylation
Modulated by Methyltransferase (MT) Inhibitors
After determining
the potential of the degron-protease-blockade-methylation sensor in
measuring H3-K9 methylation in different types of cells, we further
tested the specificity of the sensor in response to drugs that alter
the level of endogenous methyltransferase enzymes. The inhibition
of methyltransferase enzymes indirectly led to the reduction in the
level of methylation of specific histone methylation marks. We used
MT inhibitors, such as BIX01294, a specific inhibitor of EHMT2; UNC0638,
a specific inhibitor of EHMT2, GLP, SET7/9, and SET8; and Chaetocin,
a mycotoxin which selectively inhibits SU(VAR)3–9, EHMT2, DIM5,
EZH2, and SET7/9 methyltransferase enzymes. To show the specificity
of the degron-blockade-methylation sensor, we used various concentrations
of BIX01294, UNC0638, and Chaetocin to assess luciferase activity.
BIX01294 at concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 μM was
delivered to HepG2 cells stably expressing the H3-K9 methylation sensor
or its mutant (H3-L9) counterpart, and a luciferase assay was performed
to assess the effects. Methylation-mediated-luciferase-signal was
proportionately reduced in response to the increase in the concentration
of BIX01294 in cells expressing the H3-K9 sensor, whereas no significant
signal change was observed in cells expressing the mutant sensor (Figure 3A). Similarly, UNC0638 and chaetocin were tested
at concentrations of 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 8 μM and 0, 0.1, 0.2,
0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 μM, respectively. The measured luciferase-enzyme
signal was inversely proportional to the concentrations of UNC0638
(Figure 3B) and chaetocin (Figure 4A) used for the study. In addition, we also evaluated
methylation-mediated-luciferase signal in response to the treatment
of combination of chaetocin and BIX01294 (0.1 μM chaetocin +0.5,
1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 μM BIX01294) and, chaetocin and UNC0638
(0.1 μM chaetocin +0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 μM UNC0638)
in HepG2 cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor. A dose-dependent
reduction in luciferase signal was observed in cells expressing the
H3-K9 sensor (Figure 4B,C). Chaetocin treatment
at a concentration above 0.4 μM caused significant toxicity.
Figure 3
Degron
protease blockade histone methylation imaging sensors in
response to different concentration of methyltransferase inhibitors
(BIX01294 and UNC0638) studied in HepG2 cells stably expressing the
sensors. (A) Firefly luciferase signal measured from stable HepG2
cells expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors exposed to various concentrations
(0 to 4.0 μM) of BIX01294. (B) Firefly luciferase signal measured
from stable HepG2 cells expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors exposed
to various concentrations (0 to 8.0 μM) of UNC0638. Data are
mean ± standard error mean of three determinants.
Figure 4
H3-K9 imaging sensor in response to different concentrations
of
methyltransferase inhibitor (Chaetocin, BIX01294, and UNC0638) studied
in HepG2 cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor. (A) Firefly luciferase
signal measured from stable HepG2 cells expressing the H3-K9 sensor
exposed to various concentrations (0 to 0.25 μM and 0 to 0.8
μM) of Chaetocin. Concentrations of drugs are labeled on the x-axis. (B) Firefly luciferase signal measured from stable
HepG2 cells expressing the H3-K9 sensor exposed to 0.1 μM chaetocin
with different concentrations (0 to 3.0 μM) of BIX01294. (C)
Firefly luciferase signal measured from HepG2 cells stably expressing
the H3-K9 sensor exposed to 0.1 μM chaetocin with various concentrations
(0 to 4.0 μM) of UNC0638. Concentrations of drugs are labeled
on the x-axis. Data are mean ± standard error
mean of three determinants.
Degron
protease blockade histone methylation imaging sensors in
response to different concentration of methyltransferase inhibitors
(BIX01294 and UNC0638) studied in HepG2 cells stably expressing the
sensors. (A) Firefly luciferase signal measured from stable HepG2
cells expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors exposed to various concentrations
(0 to 4.0 μM) of BIX01294. (B) Firefly luciferase signal measured
from stable HepG2 cells expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors exposed
to various concentrations (0 to 8.0 μM) of UNC0638. Data are
mean ± standard error mean of three determinants.H3-K9 imaging sensor in response to different concentrations
of
methyltransferase inhibitor (Chaetocin, BIX01294, and UNC0638) studied
in HepG2 cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor. (A) Firefly luciferase
signal measured from stable HepG2 cells expressing the H3-K9 sensor
exposed to various concentrations (0 to 0.25 μM and 0 to 0.8
μM) of Chaetocin. Concentrations of drugs are labeled on the x-axis. (B) Firefly luciferase signal measured from stable
HepG2 cells expressing the H3-K9 sensor exposed to 0.1 μM chaetocin
with different concentrations (0 to 3.0 μM) of BIX01294. (C)
Firefly luciferase signal measured from HepG2 cells stably expressing
the H3-K9 sensor exposed to 0.1 μM chaetocin with various concentrations
(0 to 4.0 μM) of UNC0638. Concentrations of drugs are labeled
on the x-axis. Data are mean ± standard error
mean of three determinants.Additionally, we also tested the effect of an inhibitor of
the
demethylase enzyme on endogenous H3-K9 methylation and H3-K9 methylation
sensor signal. The HepG2 cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor
was treated with JIB-04 at various concentrations (0 to 600 nM) and
measured for a sensor signal by luciferase assay. The results showed
a JIB-04 concentration dependent increase in luciferase signal. The
result was compared with sensor signals measured in cells treated
with various concentrations of MT inhibitor BIX01294 (0–5 μM).
The BIX01294 showed a concentration dependent decrease in the luciferase
signal while JIB-04 was showing a concentration dependent increase
(R2 = 0.9549 for BIX01294, R2 = 0.7881 for JIB-04; Figure 5). The immunoblot analysis of cells for endogenous dimethylated H3-K9
protein showed a good correlation with the luciferase signal.
Figure 5
H3-K9 imaging
sensor in response to methyltransferase and demethylase
inhibitors (BIX01294 and JIB-04) studied in HepG2 cells stably expressing
the H3-K9 sensor. Graph showing normalized luciferase signals in HepG2
cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor treated with various concentrations
of BIX01294 and JIB-04. Concentrations of drugs are labeled on the x-axis. Data are mean ± standard error mean of three
determinants.
H3-K9 imaging
sensor in response to methyltransferase and demethylase
inhibitors (BIX01294 and JIB-04) studied in HepG2 cells stably expressing
the H3-K9 sensor. Graph showing normalized luciferase signals in HepG2
cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor treated with various concentrations
of BIX01294 and JIB-04. Concentrations of drugs are labeled on the x-axis. Data are mean ± standard error mean of three
determinants.
SiRNA-Mediated Silencing
of EHMT2Methyltransferase Expression
Confirms the Specificity of Degron-Protease-Blockade Sensor in Measuring
H3-K9Methylation
EHMT2 is a methyltransferase enzyme predominantly
responsible for the dimethylation of the H3-K9 methylation mark. To
test whether EHMT2 methyltransferase is involved in methylating the
expressed H3-K9 sensor fusion protein in a manner similar to what
has been observed in the endogenous H3-K9 mark, we selectively silenced
the EHMT2 methyltransferase level by siRNA. We transfected an EHMT2-specific
siRNA-pool into HepG2 cells stably expressing the methylation sensor
and performed a luciferase assay and immunoblot analysis of cell lysates.
Blockade of EHMT2 expression resulted in an 0.6-fold reduction in
methylated sensor protein levels and luciferase signal compared to
HepG2 cells treated with the scrambled siRNA counterpart (Figure 6A–C). These results demonstrated a correlation
between the methylation status of the H3-K9 peptide in the fusion
protein, sensor signaling, and the level of EHMT2 methyltransferase
expression.
Figure 6
EHMT2 specific SiRNA blocks dimethyl H3-K9 methylation. (A) Immunoblot
analysis shows the protein level of the H3-K9 sensor (FLuc ab), endogenous
H3, EHMT2, and GAPDH in HepG2 cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor
treated with scrambled and EHMT2-specific SiRNA. (B) Graph shows the
relative normalized signal of the H3-K9 sensor and EHMT2 proteins
in SiRNA-treated HepG2 cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor. (C)
Graph showing normalized luciferase signals in HepG2 cells stably
expressing the H3-K9 sensor treated with scrambled and EHMT2-specific
SiRNA. (D) Immunoblot shows the H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors copurified
with histone fractions and nonhistone fractions of HepG2 cells stably
expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors and detected with a FLuc specific
antibody. Lower panel shows histone H3 protein.
EHMT2 specific SiRNA blocks dimethyl H3-K9 methylation. (A) Immunoblot
analysis shows the protein level of the H3-K9 sensor (FLuc ab), endogenous
H3, EHMT2, and GAPDH in HepG2 cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor
treated with scrambled and EHMT2-specific SiRNA. (B) Graph shows the
relative normalized signal of the H3-K9 sensor and EHMT2 proteins
in SiRNA-treated HepG2 cells stably expressing the H3-K9 sensor. (C)
Graph showing normalized luciferase signals in HepG2 cells stably
expressing the H3-K9 sensor treated with scrambled and EHMT2-specific
SiRNA. (D) Immunoblot shows the H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors copurified
with histone fractions and nonhistone fractions of HepG2 cells stably
expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors and detected with a FLuc specific
antibody. Lower panel shows histone H3 protein.
The Degron-Blockade Histone Methylation Sensor Isolated from
Active Chromatin Complex Highlights its Functional Similarity with
the Endogenous K9Methylated H3 Protein
To confirm that the
methylated wild-type (H3-K9) sensor behaves like an endogenous K9-methylated
H3 core protein, we extracted proteins from the histone fraction (DNA
bound) and histone-free fraction and performed an immunoblot analysis
using a FLuc-specific antibody. The H3-K9 methylation-sensor protein
was coeluted with histone protein fraction, whereas the H3-L9 (mutant)
sensor protein was coeluted with the cytoplasmic (histone-free) fraction.
These results demonstrated a protein–DNA interaction between
the methylated H3-K9 domain and the heterochromatin complex, whereas
the mutant sensor was independent of heterochromatin due to the unmethylated
state of the H3-L9 domain (Figure 6D).
Imaging
H3-K9 Histone Methylation Mark in Living Animals by
Degron-Protease-Blockade Sensor
The results from in vitro experiments clearly show that the H3-K9-degron-protease-blockade-methylation
sensor provides a specific and sensitive method of measuring histone
methylation in various cells. To further demonstrate utility, we attempted
to examine the in vivo imaging potential of the histone
methylation sensor in small animal model, which is standard for the
preclinical evaluation of small molecule drugs in various cellular
targets. We chose a nude mice model to generate a luciferase signal
with less light attenuation for efficient optical bioluminescence
imaging. A tumor xenograft of HepG2 cells was generated by subcutaneous
implantation of HepG2 cells stably coexpressing Renilla luciferase-mRFP
(RLuc-mRFP) and either the H3-K9 (wild-type) or H3-L9 (mutant) sensors
on the lower flank of nude mice. Bioluminescence imaging was performed
using the IVIS spectrum optical imaging system once the tumors reached
2–3 mm in diameter (2 weeks after implantation). The methylation-mediated
FLuc signal obtained from tumors expressing the H3-K9 wild-type methylation
sensor (normalized to tumor volume) was 3.1 ± 0.7 fold higher
than the signal obtained from tumors expressing the H3-L9 mutant sensor
(0.8 ± 0.3; Figure 7A,B).
Figure 7
Degron blockade histone
methylation in small animal model. (A)
Image shows firefly luciferase signals measured from HepG2 xenografts
expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors. (B) Quantitative graph showing
normalized luciferase signals recorded in a HepG2 xenograft expressing
H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors (*p < 0.001). (C) Firefly
luciferase (FLuc) and Red fluorescent protein (RFP) signals of HepG2
xenografts expressing the H3-K9 sensor imaged in different day intervals.
The animals were treated with a combination of methyltransferase (MT)
inhibitors (Chaetocin and BIX01294) and imaged at different time intervals.
(D) Quantitative graph showing normalized luciferase signal measured
at different day intervals from the HepG2 xenograft expressing the
H3-K9 sensor treated with MT inhibitors (Chaetocin + BIX01294). (*)
Indicates time point of drug injection.
Degron blockade histone
methylation in small animal model. (A)
Image shows firefly luciferase signals measured from HepG2 xenografts
expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors. (B) Quantitative graph showing
normalized luciferase signals recorded in a HepG2 xenograft expressing
H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors (*p < 0.001). (C) Firefly
luciferase (FLuc) and Red fluorescent protein (RFP) signals of HepG2
xenografts expressing the H3-K9 sensor imaged in different day intervals.
The animals were treated with a combination of methyltransferase (MT)
inhibitors (Chaetocin and BIX01294) and imaged at different time intervals.
(D) Quantitative graph showing normalized luciferase signal measured
at different day intervals from the HepG2 xenograft expressing the
H3-K9 sensor treated with MT inhibitors (Chaetocin + BIX01294). (*)
Indicates time point of drug injection.On a side note, we observed that while HepG2 cells expressing
the
mutant sensor (H3-L9) showed equal and consistent growth patterns
with the cells expressing the wild-type sensor in cell culture, there
was a marked difference in tumor growth when these cells were implanted
in animals. In 12 of 15 animals, tumors generated from cells expressing
the mutant sensor grew to less than 1 mm in diameter, while tumors
generated from cells expressing the wild-type sensor reached 5 mm
in diameter.To further demonstrate the value of the sensor
in the screening
of small molecules that target histone lysine methylations, tumor-bearing
nude mice were treated with a combination of chaetocin (0.2 mg/kg)
and BIX01294 (20 mg/kg) every other day for 6 days, and imaging was
done every day for 12 days. Significant reduction in luciferase signal
was seen in mice treated with this combination of drugs (Figure 7C,D). Mice treated with chaetocin and BIX01294 showed
a 2.05 ± 0.3 fold luciferase signal reduction between day 3 (9.0
× 106 ± 2.4 × 105) and day 8
(3.6 × 106 ± 8.5 × 105). The
results presented thus far clearly show that the degron-protease-blockade-methylation
sensor is sensitive and specific enough to enable imaging of histone
methylation marks, both in cells and in small animals, and is suitable
for preclinical evaluation of small molecule inhibitors capable of
modulating the methylation of histone proteins at specific lysine
residues.The screening and preclinical evaluation of small-molecule
drugs
targeting histone modifications need to be validated in small animals
before proceeding further for toxicological studies, and then on to
clinical trials. To the best of our knowledge, currently there is
no real-time in vivo imaging method available to
detect histone methylation status of a specific histone lysine methylation
mark in living animals. The degron blockade sensor described in the
present study has enabled efficient measurement of the status of H3-K9-methylation
mark via optical bioluminescence imaging of xenografts in living animals.
In addition, histone methylation imaging of the tumor response to
MT inhibitors in nude mice demonstrated the potential of this sensor
in drug response evaluation in small animals. The degron-protease-blockade-methylation
sensor described in the present study therefore is suitable for histone
methylation based drug screening, in vitro validation,
and preclinical evaluation in small animals, all in one system.
The Degron-Protease-Blockade Histone Methylation Sensor Clearly
Distinguishes the Endogenous H3-K9Methylation Status of Human Induced
Pluripotent Stem Cells (hiPSC) and Differentiated Embryoid Bodies
(EBs)
Dimethylated H3-K9 is expressed differentially in embryonic
stem cells, hiPSCs, and differentiated stem cells. Patterns of H3-K9
and H3-K27 trimethylation dramatically change during the conversion
of an embryonic stem cell to lineage-committed cells, and the blockage
of trimethyl H3-K9 and H3-K27 marks is especially expanded in fibroblasts.[24] A sensitive imaging sensor would, in theory,
be able to distinguish the differential expression of specific histone
methylation marks. Therefore, the suitability of the degron-protease-blockade-histone-methylation
sensor in detecting the methylation status of H3-K9 was validated
in hiPSCs and differentiated embryoid body (EB) cells. The methylation
status of H3-K9 in hiPSCs and EB cells was determined by transfecting
them with vectors expressing the H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors in 12-well
plates, followed by a luciferase assay performed 24 h post transfection.
A luciferase signal of 3.5 × 104 RLU/μg protein
was obtained from EB cells transfected with the H3-K9 sensor, which
was significantly (∼2 fold) higher than (1.7 × 104 RLU/μg protein) the same sensor transfected in hiPSCs
(Figure 8A). The luciferase signal was significantly
lower in hiPSCs and EB cells transfected with the H3-L9 sensor compared
to the respective cells transfected with the H3-K9 sensor. The luciferase
signal obtained from hiPSCs and EB cells that were transfected with
the H3-K9 sensor correlated well with the levels of endogenous dimethylated
H3 protein at the H3-K9 mark, assessed in respective cells by immunoblot
analysis (Figure 8B). These results were well
corroborated with previous reports, which showed that H3-K9 methylation
is significantly lower in stem cells and hiPSCs when compared to their
respective differentiated lineages,[25] and
the observations of higher large organized chromatin dimethylated
H3-K9 modified regions (LOCKs) in differentiated embryonic stem cells
(31%) when compared to undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells
(∼4%).[26]
Figure 8
Imaging histone H3-K9
methylation in hiPSC and differentiated EB.
(A) Firefly luciferase signals measured from hiPSCs and embryoid bodies
(EBs) transfected with plasmids expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors.
(B) Immunoblot shows the level of dimethyl H3-K9, H3 protein, and
GAPDH in hiPSCs and EBs.
Imaging histone H3-K9
methylation in hiPSC and differentiated EB.
(A) Firefly luciferase signals measured from hiPSCs and embryoid bodies
(EBs) transfected with plasmids expressing H3-K9 and H3-L9 sensors.
(B) Immunoblot shows the level of dimethyl H3-K9, H3 protein, and
GAPDH in hiPSCs and EBs.H3-K9 methylation is identified as an epigenetic determinant
of
pre-iPSCs, and the removal of H3-K9 methylation leads to fully reprogrammed
iPSCs. Furthermore, knockdown of the setdb1 gene (that encodes histone-lysine N-methyltransferase) has been shown to induce the reprogramming
of pre-iPSCs to iPSCs.[27] Genome-wide remodeling
of H3-K9 methylation has been implicated in the transition of embryonic
stem cells to mesenchymal-like cells and ascorbic acid (vitamin C)-mediated
reduction of H3-K9 methylation-induced transition of mesenchymal-like
cells to embryonic stem cells.[28] iPSC generation
is a milestone in regenerative medicine, and research efforts are
underway to understand the epigenetic mechanism in iPSC formation
and to find factors that control epigenetic modifications. Our findings
demonstrate that the degron-blockade-histone-methylation sensor, which
can sensitively measure the methylation status of hiPSC cells and
differentiated cell lineages (i.e., embryoid bodies), will expedite
epigenetic studies in stem cell research in the future. However, the
current design of our sensor is not capable of detecting the exact
degree of methylation, such as that seen in mono-, di-, and tri-methylation
for the H3-K9 mark. We are currently looking for chromodomains from
interaction partners that can specifically bind to one of these three
modifications that are more specifically designed for independent
sensors, capable of sensitively measuring mono-, di-, and tri- methylation
of various histone methylation marks.
Conclusion
In
summary, in this study we have developed
a methylation sensor to image the dynamics of methylation in the H3-K9
mark. Its operation relies on degron protease blockade by methylation
in the H3-K9 mark. The compelling evidence presented in this report
demonstrates the power of the degron-blockade-methylation-imaging
sensor for real-time monitoring of histone methylation in various
cells as well as xenografts generated in small living animals. The
degron-blockade-methylation sensor is sensitive and specific enough
to image dimethylation flux of the H3-K9 mark. It is capable of detecting
methylation modulation in response to different methyltransferase
and demethylase inhibitors in intact cells and small animals. Overall,
this imaging sensor will pave the way for the development of novel
small molecule drugs targeting the H3-K9 methylation mark. By replacing
the 13 amino acid peptide and interacting domain, this sensor could
be used to image other important histone lysine methylation marks.
However, further studies that test various other interaction partners
and histone methylation domains (H3-K4, H3-K27, H3-K36, H3-K79, and
H4-K20) will be required to ascertain the generalizability of the
protease blockade sensor.
Methods
Refer to the Supporting Information for
methods. All experiments were repeated a minimum of three times with
triplicate samples at each time.
Authors: Kryn Stankunas; J Henri Bayle; James J Havranek; Thomas J Wandless; David Baker; Gerald R Crabtree; Jason E Gestwicki Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2007-07-09 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Kryn Stankunas; J Henri Bayle; Jason E Gestwicki; Yun-Ming Lin; Thomas J Wandless; Gerald R Crabtree Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Qin Peng; Shaoying Lu; Yuxin Shi; Yijia Pan; Praopim Limsakul; Andrei V Chernov; Juhui Qiu; Xiaoqi Chai; Yiwen Shi; Pengzhi Wang; Yanmin Ji; Yi-Shuan J Li; Alex Y Strongin; Vladislav V Verkhusha; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte; Bing Ren; Yuanliang Wang; Shu Chien; Yingxiao Wang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 11.205