BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that solid cancers contain cancer-initiating cells (CICs) that are capable of regenerating a tumor that has been surgically removed and/or treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Currently, cell surface markers, like CD133 or CD44, are used to identify CICs in vitro; however, these markers cannot be used to identify and track CICs in vivo. The 26S proteasome is the main regulator of many processes within a proliferating cell, and its activity may be altered depending on the phenotype of a cell. METHODS: Human glioma and breast cancer cells were engineered to stably express ZsGreen fused to the carboxyl-terminal degron of ornithine decarboxylase, resulting in a fluorescent fusion protein that accumulates in cells in the absence of 26S proteasome activity; activities of individual proteases were monitored in a plate reader by detecting the cleavage of fluorogenic peptide substrates. Proteasome subunit expression in cells expressing the fusion protein was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and the stem cell phenotype of CICs was assessed by a sphere formation assay, by immunohistochemical staining for known stem cell markers in vitro, and by analyzing their tumorigenicity in vivo. CICs were tracked by in vivo fluorescence imaging after radiation treatment of tumor-bearing mice and targeted specifically via a thymidine kinase-degron fusion construct. All P values were derived from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Cancer cells grown as sphere cultures in conditions, which enrich for cancer stem cells (CSCs), had decreased proteasome activity relative to the respective monolayers (percent decrease in chymotryptic-like activity of sphere cultures relative to monolayers--U87MG: 26.64%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.19 to 43.10, GL261, 52.91%, 95% CI = 28.38 to 77.43). The cancer cells with low proteasome activity can thus be monitored in vitro and in vivo by the accumulation of a fluorescent protein (ZsGreen) fused to a degron that targets it for 26S proteasome degradation. In vitro, ZsGreen-positive cells had increased sphere-forming capacity, expressed CSC markers, and lacked differentiation markers compared with ZsGreen-negative cells. In vivo, ZsGreen-positive cells were approximately 100-fold more tumorigenic than ZsGreen-negative cells when injected into nude mice (ZsGreen positive, 30 mice per group; ZsGreen negative, 31 mice per group), and the number of CICs in tumors increased after 72 hours post radiation treatment. CICs were selectively targeted via a proteasome-dependent suicide gene, and their elimination in vivo led to tumor regression. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that reduced 26S proteasome activity is a general feature of CICs that can easily be exploited to identify, track, and target them in vitro and in vivo.
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that solid cancers contain cancer-initiating cells (CICs) that are capable of regenerating a tumor that has been surgically removed and/or treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Currently, cell surface markers, like CD133 or CD44, are used to identify CICs in vitro; however, these markers cannot be used to identify and track CICs in vivo. The 26S proteasome is the main regulator of many processes within a proliferating cell, and its activity may be altered depending on the phenotype of a cell. METHODS:Humanglioma and breast cancer cells were engineered to stably express ZsGreen fused to the carboxyl-terminal degron of ornithine decarboxylase, resulting in a fluorescent fusion protein that accumulates in cells in the absence of 26S proteasome activity; activities of individual proteases were monitored in a plate reader by detecting the cleavage of fluorogenic peptide substrates. Proteasome subunit expression in cells expressing the fusion protein was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and the stem cell phenotype of CICs was assessed by a sphere formation assay, by immunohistochemical staining for known stem cell markers in vitro, and by analyzing their tumorigenicity in vivo. CICs were tracked by in vivo fluorescence imaging after radiation treatment of tumor-bearing mice and targeted specifically via a thymidine kinase-degron fusion construct. All P values were derived from two-sided tests. RESULTS:Cancer cells grown as sphere cultures in conditions, which enrich for cancer stem cells (CSCs), had decreased proteasome activity relative to the respective monolayers (percent decrease in chymotryptic-like activity of sphere cultures relative to monolayers--U87MG: 26.64%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.19 to 43.10, GL261, 52.91%, 95% CI = 28.38 to 77.43). The cancer cells with low proteasome activity can thus be monitored in vitro and in vivo by the accumulation of a fluorescent protein (ZsGreen) fused to a degron that targets it for 26S proteasome degradation. In vitro, ZsGreen-positive cells had increased sphere-forming capacity, expressed CSC markers, and lacked differentiation markers compared with ZsGreen-negative cells. In vivo, ZsGreen-positive cells were approximately 100-fold more tumorigenic than ZsGreen-negative cells when injected into nude mice (ZsGreen positive, 30 mice per group; ZsGreen negative, 31 mice per group), and the number of CICs in tumors increased after 72 hours post radiation treatment. CICs were selectively targeted via a proteasome-dependent suicide gene, and their elimination in vivo led to tumor regression. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that reduced 26S proteasome activity is a general feature of CICs that can easily be exploited to identify, track, and target them in vitro and in vivo.
Authors: Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-03-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Piccinini; O Tazartes; C Mezzatesta; E Ricotti; S Bedino; F Grosso; U Dianzani; P A Tovo; M Mostert; A Musso; M T Rinaudo Journal: Biochem J Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: Karen Mellodew; Ralf Suhr; Dafe A Uwanogho; Iris Reuter; Urban Lendahl; Helen Hodges; Jack Price Journal: Brain Res Dev Brain Res Date: 2004-07-19
Authors: Manisha H Shah; Donn Young; Hedy L Kindler; Iain Webb; Barbara Kleiber; John Wright; Michael Grever Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nancy B Davis; David A Taber; Rafat H Ansari; Christopher W Ryan; Christopher George; Everett E Vokes; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Walter M Stadler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Houman D Hemmati; Ichiro Nakano; Jorge A Lazareff; Michael Masterman-Smith; Daniel H Geschwind; Marianne Bronner-Fraser; Harley I Kornblum Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kruttika Bhat; Mohammad Saki; Erina Vlashi; Fei Cheng; Sara Duhachek-Muggy; Claudia Alli; Garrett Yu; Paul Medina; Ling He; Robert Damoiseaux; Matteo Pellegrini; Nathan R Zemke; Phioanh Leia Nghiemphu; Timothy F Cloughesy; Linda M Liau; Harley I Kornblum; Frank Pajonk Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Le Zhang; Justine Bailleul; Taha Yazal; Kevin Dong; David Sung; Amy Dao; Laura Gosa; David Nathanson; Kruttika Bhat; Sara Duhachek-Muggy; Claudia Alli; Milana Bochkur Dratver; Frank Pajonk; Erina Vlashi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.872