Literature DB >> 25488860

Postoperative complications at a university hospital: is there a difference between patients operated by supervised residents vs. trained surgeons?

Martin de Santibañes1, Fernando A Alvarez, Esteban Sieling, Hernan Vaccarezza, Eduardo de Santibañes, Carlos A Vaccaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The surgical residency system ensures supervised practices to progressively move from simple to complex surgical procedures. However, ethical dilemmas could arise if patient outcome is negatively affected by this learning methodology. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the supervised participation of residents acting as operating surgeons influences the postoperative complication rate.
METHODS: Surgeries performed between June 2010 and May 2011 were analyzed. The Dindo-Clavien classification was used to stratify the severity of complications. The complication rates of patients operated by supervised residents (SR) and trained surgeons (TS) were compared considering potential confounders related to the patient and surgical procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 3697 consecutive surgical procedures were included. Age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk were not different between patients of both groups. The overall complication rate was 10.8 %, without significant differences between the SR and TS groups (9.8 vs. 11.4 %; P = 0.14). The severity of complications was similar in both groups. Multivariate analysis adjusted for confounders confirmed that resident participation was not an independent risk factor for complications (odds ratio 1.52; 95 % CI 0.79-2.92; P = 0.20).
CONCLUSIONS: Supervised resident participation, as operating surgeon, does not negatively impact postoperative patient outcome. Residency training may therefore be considered as an ethical and safe learning methodology whenever implemented in the framework of an academic teaching hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25488860     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-014-1261-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  20 in total

1.  Ghost surgery: the ethical and legal implications of who does the operation.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Assessment of ACS NSQIP's predictive ability for adverse events after major cancer surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Borja-Cacho; Helen M Parsons; Elizabeth B Habermann; David A Rothenberger; William G Henderson; Waddah B Al-Refaie
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Early perioperative outcomes and pancreaticoduodenectomy in a general surgery residency training program.

Authors:  Craig P Fischer; Johnny C Hong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  David S Kauvar; Anthony Braswell; Brandon D Brown; Michael Harnisch
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Surgical education in the United States: navigating the white waters.

Authors:  Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A time-cost analysis of teaching a laparoscopic entero-enterostomy.

Authors:  David T Harrington; G D Roye; Beth A Ryder; Thomas J Miner; Pamela Richardson; William G Cioffi
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Moral angst for surgical residents: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eva Knifed; Aunshu Goyal; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Resident participation in index laparoscopic general surgical cases: impact of the learning environment on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  S Scott Davis; Farah A Husain; Edward Lin; Kalyana C Nandipati; Sebastian Perez; John F Sweeney
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Surgical resident supervision in the operating room and outcomes of care in Veterans Affairs hospitals.

Authors:  Kamal M F Itani; Ralph G DePalma; Tracy Schifftner; Karen M Sanders; Barbara K Chang; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Leigh Neumayer; Karl Hammermeister; Cecilia Mosca; Nancy Healey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Acquisition of diagnostic and surgical skills in otorhinolaryngology: a comparison of France and Germany.

Authors:  Natalie Oker; Virginie Escabasse; Naif Al-Otaibi; Andre Coste; Andreas E Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Post-operative Complications Following Emergency Operations Performed by Trainee Surgeons: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Deaths.

Authors:  Noha Ferrah; Karen Stephan; Janaka Lovell; Joseph Ibrahim; Barry Beiles
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Education in thyroid surgery: a matched-pair analysis comparing residents and board-certified surgeons.

Authors:  Alexander Reinisch; Patrizia Malkomes; Juliane Liese; Teresa Schreckenbach; Katharina Holzer; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Nils Habbe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison.

Authors:  Graziano Ceccarelli; Gianluca Costa; Valentina Ferraro; Michele De Rosa; Fabio Rondelli; Walter Bugiantella
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Impact of the Surgical Environment on the Incidence, Timing, and Severity of Complications Associated With Oromaxillofacial Oncologic Surgery in Dogs.

Authors:  Brittney E Rigby; Kevin Malott; Susannah J Sample; Scott J Hetzel; Jason W Soukup
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-12-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.