Literature DB >> 16412471

Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

David S Kauvar1, Anthony Braswell, Brandon D Brown, Michael Harnisch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resident participation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is important for education but increases the time of operation. This time cost in training programs is not well-defined, and available data show no decrease in operative time as residents progress in training. We undertook this study to determine the effect of the resident and attending surgeon seniority on the operative performance of LC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of LCs performed for all indications over two academic years in our training program. Operations were performed by junior (PGY 1-3) or senior (PGY 4-5) residents, assisted by junior (trained after 1994) or senior attending surgeons, none of whom had fellowship training in advanced laparoscopy. Demographics, surgeon, assistant, operative time, and operative complications were recorded. Operative diagnoses were defined as noninflammatory (biliary colic, dyskinesia, or polyps) or inflammatory (cholecystitis, pancreatitis). The primary outcome was time in minutes from skin incision to closure; secondary outcomes were complications and conversions to laparotomy. ANOVA, Student's t-test, and chi2 tests were used as appropriate with statistical significance attributed to P < 0.05.
RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen LCs were performed. Two hundred seventy were without conversion to laparotomy or intraoperative cholangiography and were included in time and complication analysis. Junior attendings averaged 4 and senior attendings averaged 21 postresidency years. No differences were found on univariate analysis between groups in demographics or diagnosis category. Operative times were longer for junior residents irrespective of attending seniority: Jr Res/Jr Staff (n = 65): 86 +/- 32 min; Jr/Sr (n = 78): 88 +/- 38 min; Sr/Jr (n = 52): 73 +/- 27 min; Sr/Sr (n = 75): 67 +/- 24 min (P < 0.05). The overall rate of operative complications was higher in junior than senior resident cases (5.6% versus 0.78%, P < 0.05). The most common complication was cystic duct leak, of which 4/5 occurred in junior resident cases. Senior attendings had a trend toward increased conversions (8.4% versus 3.7%, P = 0.09).
CONCLUSION: Resident, but not attending surgeon, seniority influences operative time and complication rate in LC. This information may help surgical educators maximize both resident learning and operative efficiency and safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16412471     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.11.578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  31 in total

1.  The cost of surgical training: analysis of operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M von Strauss Und Torney; S Dell-Kuster; R Mechera; R Rosenthal; I Langer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon's selection needed?

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Lincey C F de Nes; Pieter G Versluis; Joris Derksen; Michael F Gerhards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Resident training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: role of the porcine model.

Authors:  Marco La Torre; Carlo Caruso
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients.

Authors:  René Fahrner; Matthias Turina; Valentin Neuhaus; Othmar Schöb
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position.

Authors:  Yassar Youssef; Gyusung Lee; Carlos Godinez; Erica Sutton; Rosemary V Klein; Ivan M George; F Jacob Seagull; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Resident involvement and experience do not affect perioperative complications following robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniel T McMillan; Anthony J Viera; Jonathan Matthews; Mathew C Raynor; Michael E Woods; Raj S Pruthi; Eric M Wallen; Matthew E Nielsen; Angela B Smith
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Nereo Vettoretto; Gianfranco Silecchia; Carlo Bergamini; Pietro Maida; Pietro Lombari; Piero Narilli; Domenico Marchi; Alessandro Carrara; Maria Grazia Esposito; Stefania Fiume; Giuseppe Miranda; Simona Barlera; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Postoperative complications at a university hospital: is there a difference between patients operated by supervised residents vs. trained surgeons?

Authors:  Martin de Santibañes; Fernando A Alvarez; Esteban Sieling; Hernan Vaccarezza; Eduardo de Santibañes; Carlos A Vaccaro
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  The effect of resident participation on short-term outcomes after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Pugely; Yubo Gao; Christopher T Martin; John J Callagh; Stuart L Weinstein; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Male gender is not a risk factor for the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abdulmohsen A Al-Mulhim
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.