Literature DB >> 18063266

A time-cost analysis of teaching a laparoscopic entero-enterostomy.

David T Harrington1, G D Roye, Beth A Ryder, Thomas J Miner, Pamela Richardson, William G Cioffi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determining the success of technical skill training for surgery residents should include not only the efficacy of the training in terms of skills learned but also the cost of the facility where the training occurs and the cost of faculty participation. Traditional training occurs in the operating room, but the cost of faculty time and operating room time has not been well established. Assessing the cost of traditional training may allow us to put the cost of building and maintaining skills laboratories in perspective. To estimate the cost of traditional training we have recorded the time and interventions necessary for our senior residents to do a laparoscopic entero-enterostomy.
METHODS: Each senior resident (PGY3-5) was asked to perform a laparoscopic entero-enterostomy in its entirety as part of a laparoscopic gastric bypass. After cannulation of the abdomen and division of any adhesions, we timed the residents for the performance of the following group of tasks: finding the ligament of Treitz, dividing the bowel 50-60 cm downstream, and creating a 2-layer anastomosis at 125 or 200 cm distal to the ligament. We tracked total time and number of interventions, which are defined by the attending temporarily taking over the case.
RESULTS: Twelve residents were tracked by this system. The average time to complete the task was 93.7 minutes (+/-11.9 SD). The average number of interventions per case was 1.5 (+/-1.1 SD). Nine residents completed more than 1 procedure. Seven residents reduced their operative time on the second attempt. Operative times between the first and second procedure showed a reduction of 4.4 minutes (+/-17.4 SD), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.47). No adverse clinical sequelae developed in these small bowel anastomoses. Educational time was calculated by subtracting the resident time from the time it takes an attending or finishing laparoscopic fellow to complete this task (50 minutes). The educational time for each anastomosis was 43.7 minutes. Using the AAMC average salary for an assistant professor of surgery of $180,000 year and assuming a 60-hour work week, this is $45.52 in faculty costs per anastomosis. If the cost of an operating room is $2000 per hour, the educational cost is $1457 per anastomosis. In our program, providing our 15 senior residents an educational opportunity to perform 2 laparoscopic entero-enterostomies would cost $45,061 a year.
CONCLUSION: Resident education is expensive. Knowledge of the cost of skills training in a traditional operative setting is necessary to put the costs associated with building and maintaining skills laboratories in perspective. Cost analyses and efficacy of teaching will allow us to rate the success of new educational techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18063266     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  11 in total

1.  The cost of surgical training: analysis of operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M von Strauss Und Torney; S Dell-Kuster; R Mechera; R Rosenthal; I Langer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Significant transfer of surgical skills obtained with an advanced laparoscopic training program to a laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy in a live porcine model: feasibility of learning advanced laparoscopy in a general surgery residency.

Authors:  Julián Varas; Ricardo Mejía; Arnoldo Riquelme; Felipe Maluenda; Erwin Buckel; José Salinas; Jorge Martínez; Rajesh Aggarwal; Nicolás Jarufe; Camilo Boza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Tutorial Assistance for Board Certification in Surgery: Frequency, Associated Time and Cost.

Authors:  Robert Mechera; Salome Dell-Kuster; Marco von Strauss Und Torney; Igor Langer; Markus Furrer; Heiner C Bucher; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Simulation-trained junior residents perform better than general surgeons on advanced laparoscopic cases.

Authors:  Camilo Boza; Felipe León; Erwin Buckel; Arnoldo Riquelme; Fernando Crovari; Jorge Martínez; Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Nicolás Jarufe; Julián Varas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Outcomes of minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy with resident operative involvement.

Authors:  Emily A Slopnick; Adonis K Hijaz; J Welles Henderson; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Carvell T Nguyen; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Postoperative complications at a university hospital: is there a difference between patients operated by supervised residents vs. trained surgeons?

Authors:  Martin de Santibañes; Fernando A Alvarez; Esteban Sieling; Hernan Vaccarezza; Eduardo de Santibañes; Carlos A Vaccaro
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Development and validity evidence of an objective structured assessment of technical skills score for minimally invasive linear-stapled, hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses: the A-OSATS score.

Authors:  Mona W Schmidt; Caelan M Haney; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Vasile V Bintintan; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Alberto Arezzo; Marcus Bahra; Marc G Besselink; Matthias Biebl; Luigi Boni; Michele Diana; Jan H Egberts; Lars Fischer; Nader Francis; Daniel A Hashimoto; Daniel Perez; Marlies Schijven; Moritz Schmelzle; Marek Soltes; Lee Swanstrom; Thilo Welsch; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Hammond; Sangtaeck Lim; Yin Wan; Xin Gao; Anuprita Patkar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Structuralized box-trainer laparoscopic training significantly improves performance in complex virtual reality laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Dariusz Laski; Tomasz J Stefaniak; Wojciech Makarewicz; Monika Proczko; Zbigniew Gruca; Zbigniew Sledziński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.195

10.  New comprehensive surgical curriculum of pre-graduate surgical education.

Authors:  Dariusz Laski; Tomasz J Stefaniak; Wojciech Makarewicz; Monika Proczko; Zbigniew Gruca; Zbigniew Sledziński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.