Literature DB >> 25488416

Genomic selection prediction accuracy in a perennial crop: case study of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.).

David Cros1, Marie Denis, Leopoldo Sánchez, Benoit Cochard, Albert Flori, Tristan Durand-Gasselin, Bruno Nouy, Alphonse Omoré, Virginie Pomiès, Virginie Riou, Edyana Suryana, Jean-Marc Bouvet.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Genomic selection empirically appeared valuable for reciprocal recurrent selection in oil palm as it could account for family effects and Mendelian sampling terms, despite small populations and low marker density. Genomic selection (GS) can increase the genetic gain in plants. In perennial crops, this is expected mainly through shortened breeding cycles and increased selection intensity, which requires sufficient GS accuracy in selection candidates, despite often small training populations. Our objective was to obtain the first empirical estimate of GS accuracy in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis), the major world oil crop. We used two parental populations involved in conventional reciprocal recurrent selection (Deli and Group B) with 131 individuals each, genotyped with 265 SSR. We estimated within-population GS accuracies when predicting breeding values of non-progeny-tested individuals for eight yield traits. We used three methods to sample training sets and five statistical methods to estimate genomic breeding values. The results showed that GS could account for family effects and Mendelian sampling terms in Group B but only for family effects in Deli. Presumably, this difference between populations originated from their contrasting breeding history. The GS accuracy ranged from -0.41 to 0.94 and was positively correlated with the relationship between training and test sets. Training sets optimized with the so-called CDmean criterion gave the highest accuracies, ranging from 0.49 (pulp to fruit ratio in Group B) to 0.94 (fruit weight in Group B). The statistical methods did not affect the accuracy. Finally, Group B could be preselected for progeny tests by applying GS to key yield traits, therefore increasing the selection intensity. Our results should be valuable for breeding programs with small populations, long breeding cycles, or reduced effective size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25488416     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-014-2439-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  31 in total

1.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Genomic selection for growth and wood quality in Eucalyptus: capturing the missing heritability and accelerating breeding for complex traits in forest trees.

Authors:  Marcos D V Resende; Márcio F R Resende; Carolina P Sansaloni; Cesar D Petroli; Alexandre A Missiaggia; Aurelio M Aguiar; Jupiter M Abad; Elizabete K Takahashi; Antonio M Rosado; Danielle A Faria; Georgios J Pappas; Andrzej Kilian; Dario Grattapaglia
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genomic selection using different marker types and densities.

Authors:  T R Solberg; A K Sonesson; J A Woolliams; T H E Meuwissen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  Genome-enabled prediction using the BLR (Bayesian Linear Regression) R-package.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Ana I Vazquez; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

7.  ldne: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Chi DO
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  SSR markers in transcripts of genes linked to post-transcriptional and transcriptional regulatory functions during vegetative and reproductive development of Elaeis guineensis.

Authors:  Timothy John Tranbarger; Wanwisa Kluabmongkol; Duangjai Sangsrakru; Fabienne Morcillo; James W Tregear; Somvong Tragoonrung; Norbert Billotte
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Comparative transcriptome analysis of three oil palm fruit and seed tissues that differ in oil content and fatty acid composition.

Authors:  Stéphane Dussert; Chloé Guerin; Mariette Andersson; Thierry Joët; Timothy J Tranbarger; Maxime Pizot; Gautier Sarah; Alphonse Omore; Tristan Durand-Gasselin; Fabienne Morcillo
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Genomic selection for fruit quality traits in apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.).

Authors:  Satish Kumar; David Chagné; Marco C A M Bink; Richard K Volz; Claire Whitworth; Charmaine Carlisle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  22 in total

1.  Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Authors:  J-M Bouvet; G Makouanzi; D Cros; Ph Vigneron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genomic Selection Using BayesCπ and GBLUP for Resistance Against Edwardsiella tarda in Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus).

Authors:  Yang Liu; Sheng Lu; Feng Liu; Changwei Shao; Qian Zhou; Na Wang; Yangzhen Li; Yingming Yang; Yingping Zhang; Hejun Sun; Weiwei Zheng; Songlin Chen
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  High density SNP and DArT-based genetic linkage maps of two closely related oil palm populations.

Authors:  Siou Ting Gan; Wei Chee Wong; Choo Kien Wong; Aik Chin Soh; Andrzej Kilian; Eng-Ti Leslie Low; Festo Massawe; Sean Mayes
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genome properties of key oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) breeding populations.

Authors:  Essubalew Getachew Seyum; Ngalle Hermine Bille; Wosene Gebreselassie Abtew; Pasi Rastas; Deni Arifianto; Hubert Domonhédo; Benoît Cochard; Florence Jacob; Virginie Riou; Virginie Pomiès; David Lopez; Joseph Martin Bell; David Cros
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 6.  Phenomics, genomics of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.): way forward for making sustainable and high yielding quality oil palm.

Authors:  B Kalyana Babu; R K Mathur; P Anitha; G Ravichandran; H P Bhagya
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2021-03-14

7.  Long-term genomic selection for heterosis without dominance in multiplicative traits: case study of bunch production in oil palm.

Authors:  David Cros; Marie Denis; Jean-Marc Bouvet; Leopoldo Sánchez
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Mixed model approach for IBD-based QTL mapping in a complex oil palm pedigree.

Authors:  Sébastien Tisné; Marie Denis; David Cros; Virginie Pomiès; Virginie Riou; Indra Syahputra; Alphonse Omoré; Tristan Durand-Gasselin; Jean-Marc Bouvet; Benoît Cochard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Genomics-assisted breeding in fruit trees.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Iwata; Mai F Minamikawa; Hiromi Kajiya-Kanegae; Motoyuki Ishimori; Takeshi Hayashi
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Accuracy and responses of genomic selection on key traits in apple breeding.

Authors:  Hélène Muranty; Michela Troggio; Inès Ben Sadok; Mehdi Al Rifaï; Annemarie Auwerkerken; Elisa Banchi; Riccardo Velasco; Piergiorgio Stevanato; W Eric van de Weg; Mario Di Guardo; Satish Kumar; François Laurens; Marco C A M Bink
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 6.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.