INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a disease of weak bone. Our goal was to determine the measurement reproducibility of magnetic resonance assessment of proximal femur strength. METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. We obtained images of proximal femur microarchitecture by scanning 12 subjects three times within 1 week at 3T using a high-resolution 3-D FLASH sequence. We applied finite element analysis to compute proximal femur stiffness and femoral neck elastic modulus. RESULTS: Within-day and between-day root-mean-square coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 3.5 to 6.6 % and 0.96 to 0.98, respectively. CONCLUSION: The measurement reproducibility of magnetic resonance assessment of proximal femur strength is suitable for clinical studies of disease progression or treatment response related to osteoporosis bone-strengthening interventions.
INTRODUCTION:Osteoporosis is a disease of weak bone. Our goal was to determine the measurement reproducibility of magnetic resonance assessment of proximal femur strength. METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. We obtained images of proximal femur microarchitecture by scanning 12 subjects three times within 1 week at 3T using a high-resolution 3-D FLASH sequence. We applied finite element analysis to compute proximal femur stiffness and femoral neck elastic modulus. RESULTS: Within-day and between-day root-mean-square coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 3.5 to 6.6 % and 0.96 to 0.98, respectively. CONCLUSION: The measurement reproducibility of magnetic resonance assessment of proximal femur strength is suitable for clinical studies of disease progression or treatment response related to osteoporosis bone-strengthening interventions.
Authors: Yusuf A Bhagat; Chamith S Rajapakse; Jeremy F Magland; James H Love; Alexander C Wright; Michael J Wald; Hee Kwon Song; Felix W Wehrli Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Shing Chun Benny Lam; Michael J Wald; Chamith S Rajapakse; Yinxiao Liu; Punam K Saha; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Bone Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: S C E Schuit; M van der Klift; A E A M Weel; C E D H de Laet; H Burger; E Seeman; A Hofman; A G Uitterlinden; J P T M van Leeuwen; H A P Pols Journal: Bone Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Chamith S Rajapakse; Alexander R Farid; Daniel C Kargilis; Brandon C Jones; Jae S Lee; Alyssa J Johncola; Alexandra S Batzdorf; Snehal S Shetye; Michael W Hast; Gregory Chang Journal: Bone Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Gregory Chang; Sean Boone; Dimitri Martel; Chamith S Rajapakse; Robert S Hallyburton; Mitch Valko; Stephen Honig; Ravinder R Regatte Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Salem Alenezi; Amir Masoud Afsahi; Yajun Ma; Jiang Du; Christine B Chung; Eric Y Chang Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Cem M Deniz; Siyuan Xiang; R Spencer Hallyburton; Arakua Welbeck; James S Babb; Stephen Honig; Kyunghyun Cho; Gregory Chang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 4.379