Literature DB >> 25486232

Bias in clinical chemistry.

Elvar Theodorsson1, Bertil Magnusson, Ivo Leito.   

Abstract

Clinical chemistry uses automated measurement techniques and medical knowledge in the interest of patients and healthy subjects. Automation has reduced repeatability and day-to-day variation considerably. Bias has been reduced to a lesser extent by reference measurement systems. It is vital to minimize clinically important bias, in particular bias within conglomerates of laboratories that measure samples from the same patients. Small and variable bias components will over time show random error properties and conventional random-error based methods for calculating measurement uncertainty can then be applied. The present overview of bias presents the general principles of error and uncertainty concepts, terminology and analysis, and suggests methods to minimize bias and measurement uncertainty in the interest of healthcare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25486232     DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioanalysis        ISSN: 1757-6180            Impact factor:   2.681


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the i-STAT Alinity v in a veterinary clinical setting.

Authors:  Jasper E Burke; Thuy Hien T Nguyen; Tanya Davis; Amie Koenig; Selena L Lane; Jennifer Good; Benjamin M Brainard
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 1.569

2.  Validation study of canine serum cortisol measurement with the Immulite 2000 Xpi cortisol immunoassay.

Authors:  Jérémie Korchia; Kathleen P Freeman
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 1.569

3.  Diagnostic utility of droplet digital PCR for HIV reservoir quantification.

Authors:  Wim Trypsteen; Maja Kiselinova; Linos Vandekerckhove; Ward De Spiegelaere
Journal:  J Virus Erad       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 4.  Quality Assurance in Clinical Chemistry: A Touch of Statistics and A Lot of Common Sense.

Authors:  Elvar Theodorsson
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Uncertainty in measurement: A review of the procedures for determining uncertainty in measurement and its use in deriving the biological variation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Ian Farrance; Tony Badrick; Robert Frenkel
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2018-04-05

6.  Uncertainty of Measurement in Laboratory Medicine.

Authors:  Neda Milinković; Svetlana Ignjatović; Zorica Šumarac; Nada Majkić-Singh
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The Influence of Serum Sample Storage Conditions on Selected Laboratory Parameters Related to Oxidative Stress: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Lilla Pawlik-Sobecka; Katarzyna Sołkiewicz; Izabela Kokot; Aleksandra Kiraga; Sylwia Płaczkowska; Agnieszka Matylda Schlichtinger; Ewa Maria Kratz
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-19

8.  Evaluation of the clinical chemistry tests analytical performance with Sigma Metric by using different quality specifications - Comparison of analyser actual performance with manufacturer data.

Authors:  Murat Keleş
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  Clinical usefulness of fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for quantitative antibody measurements in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Reza Soleimani; Mehdi Khourssaji; Damien Gruson; Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos; Mathilde Berghmans; Leila Belkhir; Jean-Cyr Yombi; Benoît Kabamba-Mukadi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 20.693

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.