Franklin Hendrick1, Amy J Davidoff2, Amer M Zeidan3, Steven D Gore3, Maria R Baer4. 1. University of Maryland School of Pharmacy-Pharmaceutical Health Services Research. 2. Yale School of Public Health, Yale University. 3. Yale School of Medicine-Yale Cancer Center. 4. University of Maryland, School of Medicine-Greenebaum Cancer Center.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are widely used to treat anemia associated with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) as an off-label indication. In early 2007, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released safety alerts and mandated label changes, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented a National Coverage Determination (NCD) in August 2007, dramatically restricting ESA coverage based on specific clinical parameters in non-MDS patients. We sought to determine the effect on ESA use in MDS, examining both treatment initiation and concordance with guidelines designed to target patients most likely to benefit from therapy. METHODS: We determined receipt of ESA within 6 months of diagnosis. For ESA recipients, we operationalized three National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines: serum erythropoietin determination before ESA initiation, transfusion-independent at ESA initiation, and initial ESA treatment episode of >= 8 weeks. Logistic regression models tested the effect of time (half-year increments pre-post the August '07 CMS NCD implementation), controlling for demographics and health status. RESULTS: 17,491 (61.1%) of 28,627 beneficiaries with MDS received ESAs. ESA use increased prior to the reference period (Jan.-July 2007), but declined beginning in August 2007, the date of NCD implementation (marginal probability =-0.05, p-value<0.01). Concordance with treatment guidelines changed during the observation period, with increased rates of serum erythropoietin levels, but declined in the other two guidelines. CONCLUSION: These results suggest a mixed pattern of change in the face of the FDA safety warnings and CMS NCD in MDS and highlight the importance of monitoring for unintended consequences of policy changes.
BACKGROUND: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are widely used to treat anemia associated with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) as an off-label indication. In early 2007, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released safety alerts and mandated label changes, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented a National Coverage Determination (NCD) in August 2007, dramatically restricting ESA coverage based on specific clinical parameters in non-MDSpatients. We sought to determine the effect on ESA use in MDS, examining both treatment initiation and concordance with guidelines designed to target patients most likely to benefit from therapy. METHODS: We determined receipt of ESA within 6 months of diagnosis. For ESA recipients, we operationalized three National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines: serum erythropoietin determination before ESA initiation, transfusion-independent at ESA initiation, and initial ESA treatment episode of >= 8 weeks. Logistic regression models tested the effect of time (half-year increments pre-post the August '07 CMS NCD implementation), controlling for demographics and health status. RESULTS: 17,491 (61.1%) of 28,627 beneficiaries with MDS received ESAs. ESA use increased prior to the reference period (Jan.-July 2007), but declined beginning in August 2007, the date of NCD implementation (marginal probability =-0.05, p-value<0.01). Concordance with treatment guidelines changed during the observation period, with increased rates of serum erythropoietin levels, but declined in the other two guidelines. CONCLUSION: These results suggest a mixed pattern of change in the face of the FDA safety warnings and CMS NCD in MDS and highlight the importance of monitoring for unintended consequences of policy changes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Medicare; costs; health policy; law; pharmaceuticals; politics; prescribing; regulation; use
Authors: Stacie B Dusetzina; Ashley S Higashi; E Ray Dorsey; Rena Conti; Haiden A Huskamp; Shu Zhu; Craig F Garfield; G Caleb Alexander Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Brian Leyland-Jones; Vladimir Semiglazov; Marek Pawlicki; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Sergei Tjulandin; George Manikhas; Antoly Makhson; Anton Roth; David Dodwell; Jose Baselga; Mikhail Biakhov; Konstantinas Valuckas; Edouard Voznyi; Xiangyang Liu; Els Vercammen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Amy J Davidoff; Ilene H Zuckerman; Naimish Pandya; Franklin Hendrick; Xuehua Ke; Arti Hurria; Stuart M Lichtman; Arif Hussain; Jonathan P Weiner; Martin J Edelman Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Susan D Ross; I Elaine Allen; David H Henry; Christopher Seaman; Brian Sercus; Lawrence T Goodnough Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Mikkael A Sekeres; W Marieke Schoonen; Hagop Kantarjian; Alan List; Jon Fryzek; Ronald Paquette; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ali-Reza Golshayan; Tao Jin; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Alex Z Fu; Boris Bershadsky; Michael W Kattan; Matt E Kalaycio; Mikkael A Sekeres Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Charles L Bennett; Samuel M Silver; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Athena T Samaras; C Anthony Blau; Kara J Gleason; Sara E Barnato; Kathleen M Elverman; D Mark Courtney; June M McKoy; Beatrice J Edwards; Cara C Tigue; Dennis W Raisch; Paul R Yarnold; David A Dorr; Timothy M Kuzel; Martin S Tallman; Steven M Trifilio; Dennis P West; Stephen Y Lai; Michael Henke Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-02-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: E Hellström-Lindberg; T Ahlgren; Y Beguin; M Carlsson; J Carneskog; I M Dahl; I Dybedal; G Grimfors; L Kanter-Lewensohn; O Linder; M Luthman; E Löfvenberg; H Nilsson-Ehle; J Samuelsson; J M Tangen; I Winqvist; G Oberg; A Osterborg; A Ost Journal: Blood Date: 1998-07-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Vu H Duong; Maria R Baer; Franklin Hendrick; Sheila R Weiss; Masayo Sato; Amer M Zeidan; Steven D Gore; Amy J Davidoff Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Rong Wang; Amer M Zeidan; James B Yu; Pamela R Soulos; Amy J Davidoff; Steven D Gore; Scott F Huntington; Cary P Gross; Xiaomei Ma Journal: Prostate Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Xiaomei Ma; David P Steensma; Bart L Scott; Pavel Kiselev; Mary M Sugrue; Arlene S Swern Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 2.692