BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a national coverage determination (NCD) in July 2007, which imposed restrictions on the reimbursement of ESAs for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. Since a majority of our patients are Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries, we changed our clinical practice regarding the use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) to coincide with the NCD's reimbursement restriction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the number of transfusions in patients diagnosed with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) receiving ESAs before and after the clinical practice was changed at the University of Illinois Medical Center (UIMC). METHODS: The medical records of all adult patients diagnosed with a nonmyeloid malignancy and CIA who received an ESA between July 2006 and June 2008 at the UIMC were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: patients in receipt of ESAs BEFORE (group 1) and AFTER (group 2). The number of transfusions, the response rates to chemotherapy and ESAs therapy, and overall survival were compared. RESULTS: Medical records for 110 patients were reviewed. More transfusions were given to patients AFTER we implemented the change in clinical practice (BEFORE 18 transfusions vs. AFTER 52 transfusions, p = 0.004). More patients responded to ESA therapy AFTER we implemented the change (67% vs. 83%, p = NS). The treatment response to chemotherapy and overall survival were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The primary goal of reducing the number of transfusions in patients with CIA by administering ESAs cannot be met when clinical practice coincides with the NCD.
BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a national coverage determination (NCD) in July 2007, which imposed restrictions on the reimbursement of ESAs for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. Since a majority of our patients are Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries, we changed our clinical practice regarding the use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) to coincide with the NCD's reimbursement restriction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the number of transfusions in patients diagnosed with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) receiving ESAs before and after the clinical practice was changed at the University of Illinois Medical Center (UIMC). METHODS: The medical records of all adult patients diagnosed with a nonmyeloid malignancy and CIA who received an ESA between July 2006 and June 2008 at the UIMC were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: patients in receipt of ESAs BEFORE (group 1) and AFTER (group 2). The number of transfusions, the response rates to chemotherapy and ESAs therapy, and overall survival were compared. RESULTS: Medical records for 110 patients were reviewed. More transfusions were given to patients AFTER we implemented the change in clinical practice (BEFORE 18 transfusions vs. AFTER 52 transfusions, p = 0.004). More patients responded to ESA therapy AFTER we implemented the change (67% vs. 83%, p = NS). The treatment response to chemotherapy and overall survival were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The primary goal of reducing the number of transfusions in patients with CIA by administering ESAs cannot be met when clinical practice coincides with the NCD.
Authors: Lanfang Xu; Hairong Xu; Kimberly Cannavale; Olivia Sattayapiwat; Roberto Rodriguez; John H Page; Chun Chao Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 3.603