Literature DB >> 20976794

Effect of reimbursement changes on erythropoiesis-stimulating agent utilization and transfusions.

Gregory Hess1, Robert J Nordyke, Jerrold Hill, Scott Hulnick.   

Abstract

Cancer patients frequently develop chemotherapy-induced anemia, which can be treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. These agents have shifted the standard of chemotherapy-induced anemia treatment away from the previous mainstay of red blood cell transfusions. In July 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued a National Coverage Decision restricting reimbursement for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents to those chemotherapy patients who have hemoglobin levels <10 g/dL at initiation of therapy. This decision was hypothesized to place a greater reliance on transfusions for chemotherapy-induced anemia treatment. This observational study examined transfusions and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent utilization rates within defined episodes of chemotherapy care using electronic medical records from seven practices consisting of 39 sites of care across seven states. We compared the frequency of myelosuppressive chemotherapy treatment, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administrations, and red blood cell transfusions before and after the National Coverage Decision in oncology patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. Although exposure to myelosuppressive chemotherapy was not different, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administrations significantly decreased and blood transfusions significantly increased after implementation of the National Coverage Decision. The 31% increase in transfusions for patients aged 65 years and older was significant (P = 0.007) and higher than the 8% increase for patients younger than 65 years (P = 0.358). Changes in practice patterns for chemotherapy-induced anemia treatment that followed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement decision for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents seem to be impacting practice patterns. Further research is necessary to determine whether these changes represent a widespread and durable shift in patient treatment.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20976794     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.21837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  10 in total

1.  Trends in anemia management in lung and colon cancer patients in the US Department of Veterans Affairs, 2002-2008.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tarlov; Kevin T Stroupe; Todd A Lee; Thomas W Weichle; Qiuying L Zhang; Laura C Michaelis; Howard Ozer; Margaret M Browning; Denise M Hynes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Physician characteristics and variability of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use among Medicare patients with cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Alfred I Neugut; Elizabeth T Wilde; Donna L Buono; Jennifer Malin; Wei Y Tsai; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Trends in Anemia Management in Hemodialysis Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Anne M Butler; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Andrew F Olshan; Matthew E Nielsen; Stephanie B Wheeler; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.754

4.  Trends in anemia treatment among patients with five non-myeloid malignancies treated with chemotherapy in a large integrated health care delivery system in California, 2000-2013.

Authors:  Lanfang Xu; Hairong Xu; Kimberly Cannavale; Olivia Sattayapiwat; Roberto Rodriguez; John H Page; Chun Chao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Impact of a Patient Blood Management Program and an Outpatient Anemia Management Protocol on Red Cell Transfusions in Oncology Inpatients and Outpatients.

Authors:  Irwin Gross; Kevin M Trentino; Astrid Andreescu; Rhonda Pierson; Richard A Maietta; Shannon Farmer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-02-10

6.  Epidemiology of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Kim Cannavale; Hairong Xu; Lanfang Xu; Olivia Sattayapiwat; Roberto Rodriguez; Chet Bohac; John Page; Chun Chao
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-06-27

7.  Effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent policy decisions on off-label use in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Franklin Hendrick; Amy J Davidoff; Amer M Zeidan; Steven D Gore; Maria R Baer
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-11-26

8.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients treated with epoetins or blood transfusions.

Authors:  Antonios Douros; Kathrin Jobski; Bianca Kollhorst; Tania Schink; Edeltraut Garbe
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use after changes in medicare reimbursement policies.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Alfred I Neugut; Jin Joo Shim; Sherry Glied; Wei-Yann Tsai; Jason D Wright
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Synchronization of administrations of chemotherapy and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and frequency of associated healthcare visits.

Authors:  Jerrold W Hill; Sanatan Shreay; November McGarvey; Ajita P De; Gregory P Hess; Patricia K Corey-Lisle
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.603

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.