| Literature DB >> 25485156 |
Aditi Dua1, Kishor Chauhan2, Hilor Pathak1.
Abstract
Chemical synthesis of indigo poses harsh environmental hazards and adverse human health effects. This necessitates an environment-friendly and producer-friendly approach for indigo production. The present study was thus significant as it reports an indigenously isolated potential indigo pigment producing culture identified as Pseudomonas sp. HAV-1 with noteworthy antioxidant property. The bioindigo pigment was characterized using various analytical techniques. The pigment production was enhanced from 412 μg mL(-1) to 700 μg mL(-1) by optimizing the growth parameters. Furthermore, the antioxidant property of indigo pigment is hitherto unexplored. This property can significantly append to its therapeutic potential. The bioindigo pigment produced by Pseudomonas sp. HAV-1 depicted 2.2 μM ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant property. More to the point, the present work addresses a footstep towards green production of indigo.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25485156 PMCID: PMC4251628 DOI: 10.1155/2014/109249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Res Int ISSN: 2090-3146
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree derived from 16S rRNA gene sequence of isolate HAV-1. Sequences of closest phylogenetic neighbors obtained by NCBI BLAST (n) analysis; numbers in the parenthesis indicate accession numbers of corresponding sequences. The NJ-tree was constructed using neighbor joining algorithm with Kimura 2 parameter distances in MEGA 5.0 software.
Figure 2(a) TLC analysis of indigo pigment produced by Pseudomonas sp. HAV-1. (b) UV-Visible scan of indigo pigment produced by Pseudomonas sp. HAV-1. (c) FT-IR spectrum of indigo pigment produced by Pseudomonas sp. HAV-1.
Figure 3Induction profile of Pseudomonas sp. HAV-1 for indigo biotransformation using 3 mM indole concentration at 30°C with initial pH of 7.0.
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model.
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Prob > | ||||||
| Model | 0.178603 | 3 | 0.059534 | 10.7657 | 0.0219 | Significant |
|
| 0.000182 | 1 | 0.000182 | 0.00634 | 0.9388 | |
|
| 0.033406 | 1 | 0.033406 | 1.164996 | 0.3162 | |
|
| 0.000156 | 1 | 0.000156 | 0.005449 | 0.9432 | |
|
| 0.000636 | 1 | 0.000636 | 0.022184 | 0.8858 | |
|
| 0.157436 | 1 | 0.157436 | 5.490418 | 0.0516 | |
| Residual | 0.200723 | 7 | 0.028675 | |||
| Lack of fit | 0.197208 | 5 | 0.039442 | 1.375483 | 0.3378 | Not significant |
R 2: 0.93, Adj. R 2: 0.85, Pred. R 2: 0.97, Adqt. Prec.: 15.
Figure 4(a) 3D plot showing the interaction effect of indole concentration and inoculum size on indigo formation by Pseudomonas sp. HAV-1 and (b) Contour plot showing the interaction effect of indole concentration and inoculum size on indigo formation by Pseudomonas sp. HAV-1.
Indigo production by different bacterial cultures.
| Indigo produced | Time (h) | Culture | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 700* | 24 |
| Present study |
| 292 | 24 |
| [ |
| 662 | 24 |
| [ |
| 246 | 8 |
| [ |
| 30 | 24 |
| [ |
*After optimization.
Antioxidant property of extracted indigo as well as commercial indigo.
| Assay | Antioxidant property of commercial indigo | Antioxidant property of indigo produced by |
|---|---|---|
| FRAP | 0.13 mM FeSO4 equivalent | 0.50 mM FeSO4 equivalent |
| ABTS | 1 | 2.2 |