| Literature DB >> 25484995 |
Jessica K Barrett1, Robin Henderson2, Susanne Rosthøj3.
Abstract
We compare methods for estimating optimal dynamic decision rules from observational data, with particular focus on estimating the regret functions defined by Murphy (in J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, Stat. Methodol. 65:331-355, 2003). We formulate a doubly robust version of the regret-regression approach of Almirall et al. (in Biometrics 66:131-139, 2010) and Henderson et al. (in Biometrics 66:1192-1201, 2010) and demonstrate that it is equivalent to a reduced form of Robins' efficient g-estimation procedure (Robins, in Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Biostatistics. Springer, New York, pp. 189-326, 2004). Simulation studies suggest that while the regret-regression approach is most efficient when there is no model misspecification, in the presence of misspecification the efficient g-estimation procedure is more robust. The g-estimation method can be difficult to apply in complex circumstances, however. We illustrate the ideas and methods through an application on control of blood clotting time for patients on long term anticoagulation.Entities:
Keywords: Causal inference; Dynamic treatment regimes; G-estimation; Regret-regression
Year: 2013 PMID: 25484995 PMCID: PMC4245503 DOI: 10.1007/s12561-013-9097-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stat Biosci ISSN: 1867-1764